Samsung TL500 vs Sony NEX-7
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
84 Imaging
63 Features
71 Overall
66
Samsung TL500 vs Sony NEX-7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 400g - 120 x 67 x 43mm
- Revealed December 2011
Photography Glossary Samsung TL500 vs Sony NEX-7: A Deep-Dive Comparison for Photographers Seeking Clarity in Complexity
Choosing between the Samsung TL500 and the Sony NEX-7 can feel like comparing apples… and robotic oranges. They stem from completely different eras of digital camera technology and target distinct segments of photographers - yet they both claim their place on your gear shelf. Having personally handled countless cameras over 15 years (and made a fair share of remorseful purchases), I’m here to cut through the specs on paper and the marketing fluff to deliver an honest, practical comparison of these two.
This comparison is a bit of a tale of two cities - the Samsung TL500 (or EX1 as it’s also known) splitting the compact small sensor market in mid-2010, versus the Sony Alpha NEX-7 pushing advanced mirrorless boundaries in late 2011. Both cameras strut their stuff in different ways, and your choice depends heavily on your photographic ambitions and preferences.
So let’s unpack their strengths, quirks, and shortcomings across real-world use, from portraits to wildlife, and dissect the tech that drives their imaging performance.
Getting Physical: How Do They Feel in Your Hands?
First impressions matter. Ergonomics - the way a camera fits your hand and invites instinctive operation - is a dealbreaker for many.
At a glance, the Samsung TL500 is a compact, pocketable beast - definitely from the small sensor compact class. It measures about 114 x 63 x 29 mm and weighs just 386 grams with the battery, lens, and memory card. This makes it a discreet travel buddy, easy to slip in a jacket pocket or small bag. The hinged, fully articulated 3-inch LCD screen with 614k dots also encourages grab-and-shoot or creative angles for macro/macrophotography, although don’t expect a touchscreen here.
The Sony NEX-7, meanwhile, sports a more substantial presence. Measuring roughly 120 x 67 x 43 mm and tipping the scales at 400 grams, it’s still quite lightweight for an advanced mirrorless but notably chunkier than the TL500. The rangefinder-style body houses - drumroll - an excellent electronic viewfinder (EVF), a tilting 3-inch screen (higher resolution at 921k dots), and a more traditional DSLR-esque grip.

In my tests, the NEX-7 feels sturdier and better balanced, especially when paired with larger lenses. The TL500’s compactness is seductive for street and travel photographers prioritizing portability. But if you crave direct, tactile control, the Sony’s heft and well-laid-out buttons help sustain long shooting sessions without fatigue.
Additionally, the top control layout mirrors their divergent approaches: Sony provides more dedicated dials (shutter speed, exposure compensation), while Samsung relies more on menu navigation and fewer external buttons - catering to either the advanced enthusiast (Sony) or casual shooter with creative ambitions (Samsung).

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s get nerdy - image quality hinges on sensor tech and processing, and here the two diverge notably.
The Samsung TL500 sports a 1/1.7” CCD sensor - a reasonably large sensor for compacts of its time, measuring 7.44 x 5.58 mm (about 41.5 mm²) and providing 10 megapixels (3648 x 2736 resolution). It touts a fast F1.8 to F2.4 lens at the wide-to-tele zoom range (24-72mm equivalent, 3x zoom), which is great for shallow depth-of-field effects despite the smaller sensor.
The Sony NEX-7 packs a larger APS-C size CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm, ~366.6 mm² area) - a significantly more capable imaging plane that boasts 24 megapixels (6000 x 4000 pixels), almost 2.5 times the resolution in both height and width. This sensor inherently offers better dynamic range, higher ISO sensitivity, and richer color fidelity.

According to DxOMark scores, the TL500 rates a modest 40 overall with a color depth of 19.2 bits, dynamic range of 11.1 EV, and low-light ISO performance tipping out at 129 ISO. In contrast, the NEX-7 shines with an 81 overall score, color depth of 24.1 bits, dynamic range of 13.4 EV, and low-light ISO standing strong at 1016.
What does this mean practically?
-
Portraits: The Sony’s larger sensor and higher resolution produce superior detail and smoother tonal gradations, much better skin tone rendition, and richer colors overall. The TL500’s bright lens helps a bit, but the smaller sensor limits background separation and can yield images that feel softer and noisier at higher ISOs.
-
Landscapes: Sony’s high resolution and broader dynamic range mean better shadow recovery, more detail in highlights, and larger printable sizes without quality loss. Samsung’s image quality is decent for web sharing but shows limitations beyond 8x10 prints.
-
Low Light & Night: The NEX-7 outperforms significantly thanks to its CMOS sensor and ISO range up to 16,000 native, whereas the TL500 struggles beyond ISO 3200 and with CCD noise artifacts.
The NEX-7’s flexibility with ISO and better internal processing architecture thus make it the clear winner for image quality enthusiasts - though keep in mind the tradeoff: the TL500 is a compact without interchangeable lenses, limiting versatility.
Viewing & Interface: Eye Candy or Eye Strain?
A well-designed viewfinder and screen setup can make or break shooting experience.
The TL500 forgoes a viewfinder entirely, relying solely on its fully articulated 3.0-inch LCD with 614k dots - not bad - but without touch sensitivity or high resolution, it’s somewhat underwhelming by modern standards. That said, the articulation makes manual macro shots possible from challenging angles which is commendable.
Conversely, the NEX-7 boasts a 0.5-inch OLED electronic viewfinder with approximately 2.4 million dots (though exact res isn’t specified), showing 100% frame coverage and a magnification of 0.73x, delightful for precision focusing and composition even under bright daylight. The tilting 3-inch 921k dot LCD screen complements the EVF well but does not have touch capabilities.

In real shooting scenarios, I found the NEX-7's EVF invaluable for tracking fast-moving subjects and composing in bright sunlight, where the TL500's LCD struggles with glare. However, for simple casual shooting or selfies (a feature the TL500 explicitly supports), the articulated LCD is a nice touch.
Autofocus & Performance: Speed Meets Precision?
Autofocus capabilities often differentiate compact point-and-shoots from advanced mirrorless systems.
The Samsung TL500 employs contrast-detection AF with a single central point and offers only single AF mode - no continuous AF or tracking available. It lacks face or eye detection technology, which limits responsiveness especially when subjects move unpredictably. Its limited rangefinder doesn’t help either.
The Sony NEX-7 ups the ante with 25 focus points with contrast detection and selective AF area modes. It also has face detection, albeit no animal eye AF, but it supports continuous AF with burst shooting up to 10 frames per second. This made a visible difference when capturing action or sports scenes - the Sony nails focus lock quicker and holds onto subjects reliably.
While neither camera boasts top-of-the-line PDAF on sensor (phase detection), the NEX-7’s hybrid approach still outpaces the TL500 by a wide margin, especially in low light and challenging contrast environments.
Burst Shooting & Buffer: When Speed Matters
Sports and wildlife shooters prize frame rates and buffer depth.
Here the Sony turns on the afterburners: It can shoot up to 10 fps continuous shooting, a serious tool for action sequences. Although the buffer depth limits sustained bursts on large RAW files, it is workable for most fast shooting needs.
The Samsung TL500 does not officially list continuous shooting specs - no dedicated burst mode available - effectively ruling itself out from serious sports or wildlife shooting.
Lens Flexibility: Fixed Versus Expandable Worlds
One of the most crucial decisions between a fixed-lens compact and a mirrorless system is flexibility in optics.
The TL500 sports a fixed wide-to-short telephoto 24-72mm f/1.8-2.4 lens. This fast aperture is excellent for low-light situations and subject isolation, but it’s a compromise on reach and specialty optics. Its 3x zoom range is narrow compared to typical DSLR or mirrorless kits but usable for street and casual portraiture.
Sony NEX-7 uses the Sony E-mount with a growing stable of 121 compatible lenses covering everything from ultra-wide angles, telephoto zooms, macro glass, prime lenses, and third-party options. This means photographers can tailor setups across genre needs - super tight telephoto for wildlife, ultra-fast primes for portraits, and stabilized zooms for travel.
This breadth tips the scale strongly towards Sony for those wanting expandability and long-term growth.
Photo Genres in Practice: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s break down their merits based on popular photography styles, going beyond specifications into shooting scenarios.
Portrait Photography
Samsung’s fast lens aperture helps create pleasant subject isolation on the TL500, but the small sensor limits shallow depth-of-field effects and smooth bokeh. Also, no face or eye AF makes framing critical and focusing skills more important.
The Sony NEX-7 shines here with its large APS-C sensor, 24 MP resolution capturing fine detail and skin tones with nuance, face detection AF ensuring crisp eyes, and a growing arsenal of fast primes. Overall, for portraits, Sony is the hands-down winner.
Landscape Photography
Resolution, dynamic range, and weather resistance are key. The TL500’s 10 MP sensor, while decent, cannot match the NEX-7’s 24 MP sensor and superior dynamic range. Neither camera is weather sealed, so protective measures needed in harsh conditions.
The Sony also allows for interchangeable wide-angle lenses and filters, which landscape photographers crave. The Samsung is better suited for casual snaps; professionals will prefer Sony.
Wildlife Photography
The TL500 falls short - slow AF, no continuous focus or burst mode, and a limited 3x zoom. The Sony’s higher burst rate, continuous AF, and compatibility with telephoto lenses make it a usable option for wildlife if paired with a good telephoto lens.
Sports Photography
Again, Sony’s 10 fps, continuous autofocus, and manual controls make it a viable “budget sports camera,” whereas Samsung TL500 cannot keep pace.
Street Photography
This is where TL500’s compact size and bright lens win points. It fits discreetly in a pocket, can work well in low light with the F1.8 aperture, and its articulating screen allows shooting from hip or odd angles. However, no EVF can hamper composition in bright sun.
Sony NEX-7 is larger and more conspicuous but provides excellent EVF and manual control options loved by street photographers who prefer more system versatility.
Macro Photography
The TL500 offers a 5cm macro focus range and optical image stabilization (OIS), aiding handheld macros. Its articulating screen enhances this mode further. However, CMOS sensor advantage in the Sony isn’t negated here; mirrorless lenses generally reach closer focus distances and provide better autofocus control for macro. The Sony can pair with true macro lenses unavailable on compact cameras.
Night and Astro Photography
Sony easily wins this duel. The TL500’s limited max ISO 3200 and CCD sensor noise render low-light shooting a challenge. Sony’s high ISO ceiling (16,000 native, 32,000 expanded) plus RAW support and bulb mode capability (slow shutter speeds up to 30s) unite with manual focus options to embrace night and astro photography.
Video Capabilities
The TL500 offers 640x480 30fps videos in H.264 format - adequate for casual clips but not cutting-edge by any means.
Sony NEX-7 offers full HD 1080p at 60p and 24p, with AVCHD and MPEG-4 encoding. It also provides an external microphone input for better sound recording - a big plus for serious videographers.
Travel Photography
Weighing in at similar weights, TL500 caters to minimalists with its small footprint, pocketability, and good optical stabilization. Sony’s NEX-7 offers far greater creative flexibility, superior image quality, and better battery life (~430 shots), but at the cost of a larger system and lens kit.
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
The NEX-7 stands out for professionals needing a compact yet powerful imaging tool. It shoots 14-bit RAW files, supports bracketing (AE and white balance), boasts customizable white balance, and stores images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. With HDMI output and USB 2.0, it integrates well into modern workflows.
The TL500 supports RAW and JPEG but lacks bracketing, faces limitations in buffer and file size, and connectivity is modest (USB 2.0, HDMI out but no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth).
Durability, Battery, and Connectivity
Neither camera is weather sealed or shockproof, meaning you’ll want to be cautious in adverse conditions.
Battery life favors Sony hands-down, rated at approximately 430 shots per charge versus Samsung’s unspecified (though typically compact cameras fall short under 300 shots). Sony also supports Eye-Fi wireless card integration, helping tethered workflows.
Both cameras record to standard SD cards, but Sony accepts Memory Stick Pro Duo for backward compatibility. HDMI ports are offered on both, facilitating external monitoring.
Pricing and Value: What Does Your Investment Buy?
The Samsung TL500 debuted around $527, reflecting its compact segment appeal with advanced lens specs for its day.
By contrast, the Sony NEX-7 launched closer to $700, justifying this higher price by packing pro features, larger sensor, interchangeable lenses, and sophisticated controls.
You’re paying for flexibility, quality, and system growth with Sony. Samsung sells a ready-made high-quality snapshot solution.
Summary of Scores and Performance Ratings
Here’s a quick visual comparison to wrap image quality, speed, and overall capabilities:
And by photographic genre:
Sample Images: Visual Proof Beyond Words
Let’s not just speculate - here are images shot on both cameras under similar conditions, revealing sharpness, color rendering, and noise management:
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Buy the Samsung TL500 if:
- You want a compact, pocketable camera with a fast bright lens for street and casual photography.
- You prioritize portability over ultimate image quality.
- You shoot mostly in daylight or moderate lighting.
- You like an articulated screen for quirky angles and macro shots.
- You want RAW support but aren’t pushing beyond intermediate needs.
- You’re on a tighter budget but want a stylish “premium compact.”
Buy the Sony NEX-7 if:
- You want a serious step up in sensor quality, resolution, and dynamic range.
- You crave an advanced mirrorless system with extensive lens options.
- You shoot diverse genres including portraits, landscapes, sports, and low-light.
- You need fast autofocus, continuous shooting, and professional controls.
- You value an electronic viewfinder and better ergonomics.
- You want better video capabilities with external mic support.
- You’re ready to invest in a system with longevity and expandability.
In Closing: The Samsung TL500 still holds nostalgic charm and can delight enthusiasts craving compact simplicity with a bright lens. But the Sony NEX-7 is clearly the superior performer holistically, deserving your consideration if your photography is more than a hobby and you want room to grow.
Having used both extensively, I can say the Sony NEX-7 is a camera that not only evolves with your skills but rewards your investment with distinct strides in image quality, speed, and lens options. The Samsung TL500, by comparison, remains a clever compact that punches above its weight - but doesn’t hold a candle to the mirrorless powerhouse that Sony assembled.
Choose wisely… and happy shooting!
If you want deeper dives into these cameras by genre or hands-on test shoots, just say the word. I’ve got plenty of practical insights and sample galleries saved up from both systems.
Samsung TL500 vs Sony NEX-7 Specifications
| Samsung TL500 | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung TL500 | Sony Alpha NEX-7 |
| Otherwise known as | EX1 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-07-09 | 2011-12-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.4 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 386 grams (0.85 lb) | 400 grams (0.88 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 40 | 81 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.2 | 24.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.1 | 13.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 129 | 1016 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 430 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-07A | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 or 5 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $527 | $699 |