Samsung WB1100F vs Sony A6100
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37


81 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony A6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 396g - 120 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced August 2019

Samsung WB1100F vs Sony A6100: An Expert’s Real-World Camera Comparison
When weighing your next camera purchase, the choice can often feel like charting two very different paths: affordable ease versus advanced potential; simple superzoom versus sophisticated interchangeable lens system. Today, I’ll take you through a detailed head-to-head between the Samsung WB1100F, a 2014 superzoom bridge camera, and the markedly more advanced Sony Alpha a6100, a 2019 mirrorless hybrid. Each comes with a distinct philosophy and target user in mind. From sensor tech and autofocus systems, to handling and image quality across photography genres - we’ll cover everything you need to know to decide which suits your style, skill level, and budget.
Both cameras reflect their respective eras and design priorities - so buckle up for a deep dive that goes well beyond spec sheets into hands-on usability and image-making nuances. By the end, you’ll have a grounded understanding of their abilities and limits, allowing you to make a truly informed decision.
Getting a Grip: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout
First impressions count - and much of a camera’s comfort and workflow comes down to how it feels in hand and how its controls are arranged.
The Samsung WB1100F features an SLR-like bridge camera body, chunkier and heavier at 512 grams with dimensions of 125x87x96mm. This robust stance is typical of superzooms designed around accommodating long fixed lenses - in this case, a substantial 25-875mm equivalent zoom. The grip is reasonable but not sculpted for prolonged handling, which can lead to fatigue over extended shooting. Its top surface is clutter-free but limited in physical control options. It lacks a viewfinder completely, relying solely on a 3.0-inch fixed LCD with moderate 460k-dot resolution.
On the flip side, the Sony A6100 is a highly compact and lighter mirrorless camera at 396 grams and 120x67x59mm size. It sports a rangefinder-ish silhouette that fits neatly into one hand, with a sharper, more ergonomic grip that lends itself well to handheld shooting for long periods. Importantly, it includes a high-resolution 1440k-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage - a necessity for serious photographic composition. The 3.0-inch tilting touchscreen LCD at 922k dots supports intuitive live view and menu navigation. Meanwhile, its top plate includes dedicated dials and buttons for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive modes, streamlining manual control.
You can clearly see the bulk and heft advantage of the WB1100F against the smaller, lightweight A6100.
If handling finesse and responsive control are critical to you, the Sony’s compact form and tactile dials offer a substantial usability edge. The Samsung’s bulk is understandable given the superzoom design but feels less refined.
Sensor Sizes and Image Quality: CCD vs CMOS
Under the hood lies arguably the most significant difference - sensor technology and size.
The Samsung WB1100F is built around a modest 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55mm (28.07 mm² area) with a 16MP resolution. CCDs have historically favored sharp, colorful output but suffer in dynamic range and noise control compared to modern CMOS sensors. The tiny sensor area limits light-gathering capability, translating to struggles in low-light and higher ISO noise.
The Sony A6100, on the other hand, sports a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.6mm (366.6 mm²), housing 24MP pixels. This sensor size represents a 13x increase in area over the Samsung’s - dramatically improving dynamic range, signal-to-noise ratio, and color depth. CMOS sensors also allow faster readout speeds essential for high frame rate shooting and video.
The vast gulf in sensor sizes underlines the potential for the Sony to deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging scenarios.
In practical use, the Samsung produces acceptable images in good daylight but quickly reveals noise and softness creeping in as light levels fall or zoom reaches maximum reach. The Sony’s images are noticeably sharper with better tonal gradation and much cleaner high ISO performance up to ISO 32000 native, expandable to 51200. The latter also supports RAW capture, preserving flexible post-processing options absent in the Samsung.
For photographers prioritizing image quality, especially those shooting portraits, landscapes, or low light scenes, the Sony’s sensor advantage is decisive.
Live View Interface and User Experience
Moving to the cameras’ main visual interfaces - the LCD screens and viewfinders.
The Samsung’s 3-inch fixed LCD has a 460k-dot resolution with no touch functionality and no articulating capabilities. This limits framing flexibility and ease of navigating menus or touch-based focusing. The lack of any EVF means shooting in bright sunlight can be challenging, with glare obscuring the LCD.
In contrast, the Sony A6100’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 922k dots offers great clarity and responsiveness, perfect for framing at high or low angles. Combined with the 0.71x magnification, 1440k-dot EVF - which delivers a crisp, lag-free preview identical to final exposure - the A6100 shines for precise composition and exposure checking in all environments.
Sony’s tilting touchscreen and EVF make a world of difference for versatile shooting angles and intuitive controls.
The presence of touchscreen focusing and customizable buttons on the Sony improves speed and accuracy during shooting - features missing on the Samsung.
Autofocus Systems and Speed: Hunting or Pinpoint?
Autofocus can make or break the shooting experience, especially in fast-paced genres like wildlife or sports.
The Samsung WB1100F uses a fairly basic contrast-detection AF system with no face or eye detection, no continuous AF, and no selectable focus points. With just a single continuous shooting mode pegged at 1 FPS, the camera is designed largely for static subjects. AF speed is slower, with a tendency to hunt under lower light or zoomed-in conditions due to the smaller sensor and older tech.
Meanwhile, the Sony A6100 introduces sophisticated hybrid AF combining 425 phase-detection points covering almost the entire frame, supplemented by contrast detection. This system excels at tracking moving subjects, locking focus almost instantly, and even supports eye detection for both humans and animals - a boon for portrait and wildlife photographers alike. Continuous shooting up to 11 FPS with AF/AE tracking places it squarely in the realm of high-performance shooters.
For grabbing decisive moments in sports, street, or wildlife photography, the Sony’s autofocus system is a significant professional-grade feature absent in the Samsung.
Lens Ecosystem and Telephoto Reach
The Samsung WB1100F packs a fixed 25-875 mm (35mm equivalent) lens with an aperture range of f/3.0-5.9. This 35x optical zoom enables immense reach for distant subjects and casual travel without swapping optics. Optical image stabilization helps temper camera shake, but optical quality beyond mid-zooms is naturally constrained by the compact lens design.
Conversely, the Sony A6100’s Sony E-mount gives you access to over 120 native lenses including impressive primes, professional telephotos, macro lenses, and fast zooms from Sony and third-party manufacturers like Sigma and Tamron. The focal length multiplier of 1.5x applies to APS-C sensors, so a 200 mm lens behaves like a 300 mm equivalent telephoto. This system flexibility is unparalleled in a bridge camera and lets photographers craft tailor-made kits for specific genres.
While the Samsung covers a huge focal range in one package, it sacrifices optical sharpness, low-light performance, and depth-of-field control versus the Sony’s access to pro-grade glass.
Burst Rates, Buffering, and Performance
For action photography, frame rate and buffer depth matter.
The WB1100F’s 1 FPS burst is a non-starter for dynamic scenes, more suited for deliberate, composed shots. Coupled with slow AF, its capacity to track action is limited.
The A6100 delivers 11 FPS burst shooting with continuous AF and exposure tracking, combined with fast buffer clearing thanks to SD UHS-I cards. That’s a serious option for sports and wildlife photographers hunting fleeting expressions or movement.
Build Quality, Weatherproofing, and Durability
Neither camera offers professional-grade weather sealing, dust resistance, or shockproofing. Both are best treated carefully in harsh environments. The Samsung’s larger build feels more rugged, but the Sony’s polycarbonate body is sturdy and well-constructed - enough for daily use but less so in the wild’s worst weather.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life is an area where mirrorless cameras have often lagged but the Sony A6100 impresses with approximately 420 shots per charge, exceeding many competitors in the category. The Samsung WB1100F’s listed battery ratings are not clearly specified, but bridge cameras of its vintage typically managed fewer shots - likely in the 200–300 range.
Both cameras rely on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, although the Sony additionally supports Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.
Still Photography Performance Across Genres
Now, let’s bring it all together with real-world genre evaluations.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand skin tone fidelity, shallow depth of field (bokeh), and sharp eyes.
- The Samsung’s small sensor limits bokeh potential and often results in more uniform focus zones. Lack of autofocus eye detection means manual composition is needed for sharp eyes. Skin tones are decent in bright light but poorly rendered under mixed or low lighting.
- The Sony’s APS-C sensor and wide lens selection enable creamy background separation for professional-looking portraits. Eye AF locks on subjects effortlessly, making portraits sharper. The larger sensor captures more nuanced skin tones and fine detail.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prize resolution, dynamic range, weather durability.
- The Samsung’s 16MP sensor and limited dynamic range struggle with scenes that have extremes of light and shadow. The fixed lens is wide at 25mm but not ultra-wide, restricting framing options.
- The Sony’s 24MP sensor offers richer file detail and excellent wide ISO dynamic range. Coupled with access to wide-angle lenses and tilting screen for hand-held low-angle shots, it is the better landscape tool. Lack of weather sealing limits its outdoor ruggedness but manageable with care.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife demands reach, fast AF, and burst speed.
- The Samsung’s 35x zoom is physically impressive but compromised by sluggish contrast AF and low frame rates. Image quality drops off at extreme telephoto with softness and noise.
- The Sony supports fast hybrid AF, 11 FPS burst, and superior telephoto lenses (e.g., 100-400mm equivalents). Eye AF for animals aids focus, making it a solid choice for serious wildlife photographers.
Sports Photography
Speed and tracking vs burst and AF accuracy.
- The Samsung is not built for sports, with 1 FPS serial shooting and slow focus.
- The Sony excels due to 11 FPS, AF tracking, and manual exposure controls for fast action capture.
Street Photography
Discreet size, fast AF, and low light handling matter.
- The Samsung is bulky and lacks an EVF, complicating discreet use.
- The Sony’s compact frame, silent electronic shutter, eye AF, and excellent low light ISO perform well in street scenes.
Macro Photography
Magnification and focusing precision.
- The Samsung lacks dedicated macro specs.
- The Sony, combined with native macro lenses and precise AF, is a strong macro contender.
Night/Astro Photography
High ISO performance and exposure flexibility.
- The Samsung’s small sensor and limited ISO hurt night shooting.
- The Sony’s native ISO of 32000, exposure modes, and noise control excel under the stars.
Notice the Sony’s superior sharpness and color fidelity compared to the Samsung’s more muted and noisier output.
Video Capabilities
The Samsung records HD video at 720p, adequate for casual use but not suitable for modern video creators. No microphone input, no 4K, and limited frame rates constrain video creativity.
The Sony A6100 supports 4K UHD at 30p with high-quality XAVC S codec, clean HDMI output, and a microphone port for audio. Although it lacks headphone output, it’s nonetheless a solid camera for hybrid shooters who need competent video alongside stills.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Both offer built-in WiFi and NFC for image transfer and remote control, but the Sony adds Bluetooth, improving pairing with mobile devices for geotagging and app control.
Price-to-Performance Ratio
At the time of comparison:
- Samsung WB1100F retails around $250, an attractive price for budget casual shooters needing a simple superzoom with basic controls.
- Sony A6100 sits near $750, placing it in the entry-level enthusiast mirrorless category, but vastly more capable given its advanced features.
The Sony naturally outperforms the Samsung across core score categories.
Here you see how the Sony dominates in almost every photography discipline.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
If you want a lightweight all-in-one pocketable zoom capable of shooting vacation snaps with ease and minimal fuss - and your budget is tight - the Samsung WB1100F remains a simple superzoom option. It’s straightforward for beginners or those who dislike fussing with lenses or settings, and the extensive zoom can reach subjects the Sony needs additional glass to match.
However, for photography enthusiasts and professionals looking for image quality, versatility, and future upgradability, the Sony A6100 is the clear winner. Its advanced autofocus, large APS-C sensor, interchangeable lens system, and 4K video put it leagues ahead. It comfortably serves beginners keen to grow as well as pros needing a compact secondary camera for genres like portraits, wildlife, street, and sports.
Summary Table
Feature | Samsung WB1100F | Sony Alpha a6100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CCD (16MP) | APS-C CMOS (24MP) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 32000 (51200 expanded) |
Lens | Fixed 25–875mm (35x zoom) | Interchangeable Sony E mount |
Video | 720p HD | 4K UHD 30p |
Autofocus Points | None / basic contrast AF | 425 hybrid AF with eye AF |
Continuous Shooting | 1 FPS | 11 FPS |
Viewfinder | None | 1440k EVF |
Screen | Fixed 3" 460k LCD | Tilting 3" 922k touchscreen |
Weight | 512g | 396g |
Price | $250 | $750 |
My personal take: The Samsung WB1100F represents a bygone era of superzooms, offering simplicity and extensive zoom reach in a single package, ideal for budget-conscious travelers or casual shooters. But in the modern photographic landscape, where image quality, autofocus performance, and creative flexibility reign, the Sony A6100 pulls decisively ahead, making it my recommended choice for anyone serious about photography or hybrid content creation.
If you’re after a wise investment with room to grow, add glass, or shoot video seriously, the Sony Alpha a6100 delivers pro-level features without breaking the bank. Still, for those starting out and needing an affordable, no muss superzoom, the Samsung WB1100F has its place.
I hope this thorough comparison illuminates the strengths and shortcomings of these cameras, clarifying which tool aligns best with your photographic ambitions. Happy shooting!
Samsung WB1100F vs Sony A6100 Specifications
Samsung WB1100F | Sony Alpha a6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB1100F | Sony Alpha a6100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2019-08-28 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-875mm (35.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Flash off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless, hi-speed |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 512 grams (1.13 lb) | 396 grams (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") | 120 x 67 x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $250 | $748 |