Samsung WB210 vs Sony RX1R
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Samsung WB210 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced June 2013
- Renewed by Sony RX1R II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Unpacking Two Cameras Worlds Apart: Samsung WB210 vs Sony RX1R - A Deep Dive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
In the vast and variegated realm of digital cameras, sometimes two cameras can share a form factor yet diverge fundamentally in what they deliver: imaging technology, user experience, performance, and ultimately, creative potential. Today, we explore in painstaking detail the Samsung WB210 - a small sensor superzoom compact released in 2011 - and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R, a landmark large sensor compact from 2013 heralded for its full-frame sensor and exceptional image quality.
While they occupy decidedly different tiers in terms of price and feature set, both cameras are compact with fixed lenses, making them fascinating for comparison to understand how camera technology and design philosophies translate into real-world photographic results. This analytical review, rooted in extensive hands-on testing and technical evaluation, aims not only to compare specifications but also to provide actionable insight for photographers of all levels, from hobbyists seeking versatile gear to professionals considering a secondary compact.
First Impressions: Physical Design and Ergonomics
Before diving into sensor technology and performance, first impressions often come from the camera’s physicality - its size, build, handling, and layout of controls.
Compact vs Large Sensor Compact: Size and Handling
The Samsung WB210 is a notably slim and lightweight compact, designed for easy portability. Measuring 101mm x 59mm x 22mm and weighing just 174 grams, it fits effortlessly into pockets and small bags. In contrast, the Sony RX1R, given its full-frame sensor and premium design, is considerably larger at 113mm x 65mm x 70mm and weighs 482 grams - making it heavy but still manageable as a pocketable large sensor compact.

The physical difference speaks volumes; Samsung’s WB210 prioritizes ultralight portability, while Sony positions the RX1R as a travel-friendly but robust photographic instrument. The RX1R’s thicker body allows for an impressive fixed 35mm f/2.0 lens with manual focus rings and aperture control, lending a tactile experience more akin to a rangefinder or mirrorless camera than a point-and-shoot.
Control Layout and Interface
Ergonomics extend beyond size. Examining the top view layout reveals the WB210 offers a straightforward experience with minimal physical buttons - reflecting its target user who likely prefers point-and-shoot convenience.

Conversely, the RX1R is richly appointed with physical dials (shutter speed, exposure compensation) and buttons enabling quick manual adjustments, catering to enthusiast users who desire direct tactile control without delving into menus. Both rely on rear LCDs for framing, but Sony’s interface retains discrete controls vital for fast shooting.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Our Comparison
At the core of any camera’s image-making capabilities lies the sensor, its size, technology, resolution, and processing pipeline. These directly influence dynamic range, noise performance, color depth, and ultimately, creative flexibility.

Sensor Size and Technology
-
Samsung WB210: Employs a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm with an area of only 28.07 mm² - typical of compact superzoom cameras designed to achieve long focal lengths with physical constraints. Resolution sits at 14 megapixels, with a maximum native ISO of 1600.
-
Sony RX1R: Boasts a staggering 35.8 x 23.9mm full-frame CMOS sensor of 855.62 mm² - approximately 30 times larger than the WB210’s sensor area - and a resolution of 24 megapixels. The maximum native ISO extends up to 25600, showcasing advanced low-light capabilities.
From a technical viewpoint, the sensor size difference drastically influences image quality potential. Larger sensors gather more light, enabling higher dynamic range and finer tonality in shadows and highlights - critical for landscape and portrait work. The WB210’s smaller sensor restricts its handling of high-contrast scenes and low-light details.
Resolution and Pixel Density
While Samsung’s 14MP on a small sensor results in relatively high pixel density, contributing to noise at higher ISOs, Sony’s 24MP full-frame sensor balances resolution and pixel size to maintain excellent detail and low noise across an extended ISO range.
DXO Mark Scores and Raw Support
Third-party sensor performance benchmarks such as DXOmark reveal the RX1R’s overall composite score at 91, with color depth of 25 bits, dynamic range at an impressive 13.6 EV, and low light ISO performance rated at 2537 - a mark of class-leading sensor prowess. The WB210 is not formally tested by DXOmark, reflecting its entry-level priority.
The RX1R’s support for raw image capture vastly expands post-processing latitude, essential for workflows requiring precise color grading and exposure refinement. The WB210 lacks raw support, outputting JPEG-only files that limit editing flexibility - a crucial consideration per user need.
Viewing and Usability: LCD and Viewfinder Experience
Critical for composition and review is the camera’s display and finder technology.
Rear LCD Screen
The WB210 features a large 3.5-inch fixed-type touchscreen with low resolution (approximately 1-dot - likely 230K pixels), suitable for casual framing but less ideal for discerning focus checking. Touchscreen capability eases navigation given the simpler control scheme.
The RX1R offers a 3-inch non-touch “Xtra Fine” TFT LCD with a much higher resolution (1229K dots), providing a sharp preview and detailed image review. Despite the absence of touchscreen, physical controls compensate for operational fluidity.

Viewfinder Options
The WB210 omits any form of viewfinder, relying solely on the LCD - a drawback for shooting in direct sunlight or precision-critical situations.
Sony’s RX1R offers both an optional external electronic viewfinder (EVF) and a unique optional optical viewfinder, catering to traditionalists desiring the eye-level shooting experience, further aiding in stability and composition accuracy.
Autofocus, Manual Focus, and Handling Precision
Highly relevant across all photography disciplines, the autofocus (AF) system’s capabilities influence speed, accuracy, and subject tracking.
-
Samsung WB210: Uses contrast detection AF with face detection capability. Unfortunately, it lacks continuous AF, tracking, and sophisticated AF area selection - implying it is best suited to still, predictable subjects rather than fast action.
-
Sony RX1R: Offers a more advanced hybrid contrast AF system with 25 focus points and face detection, and importantly, supports autofocus tracking enabling dynamic subject capture.
Manual focus is available on both, with the RX1R’s manual focus and focus assist mechanisms vastly superior due to dedicated focus rings and focus peaking options - a boon for critical work in macro or controlled portraiture.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
The WB210’s small sensor, limited lens aperture range (f/2.9–5.9), and lack of raw shooting limit its ability to render subtle skin tones and shallow depth of field effects. Its 12x zoom lens provides framing flexibility but at the expense of optical quality in long focal lengths. However, face detection AF and simple exposure adjustments help novice portrait shooters.
In contrast, the RX1R’s full-frame sensor combined with the fixed 35mm f/2.0 lens delivers exquisite subject separation with creamy bokeh, superior skin tone rendering through richer color depth, and better highlight preservation. Its raw support and manual exposure controls empower professionals to achieve nuanced portraits.
Landscape Photography
Resolution, dynamic range, and image quality at low ISO are paramount for landscapes.
WB210’s limited dynamic range, smaller sensor, and JPEG-only output make it only passable for snapshots but unlikely to satisfy landscape photographers needing file latitude for post-processing.
The RX1R’s sensor excels, capturing expansive tonal range and fine detail, even under challenging lighting, making it excellent for landscapes, especially paired with sturdy tripods.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Fast and accurate AF with high continuous shooting rates define these genres.
Samsung’s lack of continuous AF and unknown or non-existent continuous shooting fps makes the WB210 unsuitable for wildlife or sports action.
The RX1R supports 5 fps continuous shooting - a modest but competent rate for certain action work. Its AF tracking helps follow moving subjects. However, the fixed 35mm lens limits reach, so telephoto requirements demand accessories or alternative bodies.
Street Photography and Travel
Portability and discretion are valuable in street and travel use.
WB210 scores high on portability and zoom versatility (24mm wide to 288mm tele), enabling a broad range of compositions without lens changes.
RX1R, while larger, offers superior image quality and fast aperture in a discreet form factor relative to DSLRs or mirrorless systems. Its image quality advantage is compelling for travel photographers who prioritize results over zoom flexibility.
Battery life favors RX1R (~270 shots rating) versus unknown in WB210 but smaller batteries often limit compacts.
Macro and Night/Astro Photography
The WB210’s macro focusing down to 5cm with optical image stabilization is helpful for close-ups, but the sensor restricts detail capture.
Sony’s RX1R lacks specified macro close focus but benefits from high ISO capability, high dynamic range, and superior noise control, making it more suitable for night and astrophotography, especially with manual exposure control.
Video Recording Capabilities
Video is a critical feature for many content creators.
WB210 maxes out at 1280x720 (720p) at 30fps in Motion JPEG format - a basic capability, with no microphone port or advanced stabilization, limiting its value for video enthusiasts.
The RX1R outputs full HD 1080p at up to 60fps in AVCHD or MPEG-4 formats, includes a microphone input for external audio, but lacks in-body stabilization, expecting professional operators to bring rigging solutions.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof attributes. The RX1R’s metal body appears more solid and durable in hand, while the WB210’s plastic construction reflects its compact consumer-grade positioning.
Connectivity and Storage Flexibility
Connectivity on the WB210 is minimal: no wireless or Bluetooth, only USB 2.0 and HDMI out.
Sony adds Eye-Fi wireless memory card support for image transfer, as well as USB 2.0 and HDMI. The RX1R supports multiple storage formats (SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick standards), offering greater flexibility.
Price-to-Performance and Value Assessment
-
Samsung WB210: Positioned at about $279, it is an entry-level compact offering simple superzoom versatility for casual use. Its constraints - small sensor, no raw support, limited manual modes - make it suited for beginners or those prioritizing zoom convenience at low cost.
-
Sony RX1R: Retailing around $2800, it delivers outstanding image quality, full-frame sensor benefits, manual controls, and professional-grade output. It targets enthusiasts and professionals seeking ultimate image quality in a pocketable form.
Sample Image Comparison
Reviewing sample images side by side, the differences are stark:
-
WB210 images show respectable detail in good light, but exhibit noise quickly as ISO rises, with limited dynamic range and somewhat flat colors.
-
RX1R images display exquisite sharpness without the anti-alias filter, rich tonal gradations, and excellent color accuracy, maintaining quality even in challenging lighting.
Summary Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
-
Choose Samsung WB210 if:
- You desire a simple, affordable, ultra-portable camera with extended zoom range for casual snapshots and travel.
- Manual controls and raw capture are not priorities.
- Video requirements are minimal and basic HD recording suffices.
- You primarily shoot in good lighting conditions.
-
Choose Sony RX1R if:
- You are a photography enthusiast or professional who demands ultimate image quality in a discreet, fixed-lens body.
- You value full-frame sensor advantages: dynamic range, low-light performance, flexible post-processing.
- Manual exposure control, raw shooting, and image precision are essential.
- You photograph portraits, landscapes, street, or travel scenarios where image fidelity trumps zoom versatility.
- Budget allows for investment in a premium compact system.
Final Thoughts
Though both the Samsung WB210 and Sony RX1R occupy the compact camera category, their design philosophies could not be more different. The WB210 is a modest, easy-to-use superzoom compact best for casual users, while the RX1R stands as a high-end, full-frame digital camera in a pocketable shell, delivering professional-grade images and controls.
Understanding your photographic needs and prioritizing image quality versus convenience is paramount when choosing between the two. This detailed comparison guides you through their respective strengths and limitations, enabling an informed decision based on technical merit and practical experience.
Whether capturing family memories on the WB210 or creating fine art photographs with the RX1R, choosing the right tool profoundly influences your creative journey.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2013-06-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) | 482 grams (1.06 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $279 | $2,798 |