Samsung WB250F vs Sony A7R III
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
63 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Introduced October 2017
- Older Model is Sony A7R II
- Later Model is Sony A7R IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month From Compact Convenience to Professional Power: Comparing the Samsung WB250F and Sony A7R III
In the world of photography gear, the gulf between point-and-shoot compacts and high-end mirrorless cameras is vast - not just in price, but in capabilities, performance, and creative potential. Today, I’m diving deep into a side-by-side comparison of two cameras that couldn’t be more different yet often get grouped by eager buyers thinking about stepping up their photography game.
On one hand, we have the Samsung WB250F, a small sensor superzoom introduced in 2013, designed for casual photographers seeking versatility without complexity. On the other, the Sony Alpha A7R III - a full-frame professional mirrorless powerhouse from 2017, cherished by pros and enthusiasts for its exceptional image quality and robust feature set.
Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’ll walk you through exactly what sets these two apart on every key front - sensor technology, autofocus system, build, handling, image quality, and more - sprinkled with anecdotes from hands-on trials as well as concrete technical insights. Let’s start by sizing them up.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Physical Design
When you pick up both the Samsung WB250F and Sony A7R III side-by-side, the difference in bulk and ergonomics immediately stands out.

The WB250F is compact and feather-light at just 226 grams with dimensions roughly 106x62x22mm - almost pocketable. Its slim, slab-like body feels more like a high-end smartphone than a camera you’d use extensively for manual controls or professional shoots. It’s clearly designed for ease and portability, making it ideal for casual travel or family outings where lugging heavy gear is a no-go.
Contrast that with the A7R III, which tips the scales at 657 grams and measures about 127x96x74mm. It’s bulkier, but with good reason: the thicker grip, a sturdier body crafted from magnesium alloy, and a design tailored to extended use. The ergonomics are closer to a DSLR experience, with deep-set dials, a responsive shutter button, and comfortable handgrip that supports long shooting sessions without fatigue.
The WB250F’s fixed lens and minimal controls sit flush on a neat top plate, inviting quick point-and-shoot use. The A7R III's top view reveals an impressive control layout - customizable dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and shooting modes, plus a dedicated AF joystick for precise focus point selection.

In short, if you prize sheer portability and traveling light, the Samsung wins hands down. If you want a camera you can physically shape to your shooting style with confident, tactile controls, the Sony's much more to your taste.
Sensor Size and Image Quality - Where the Gap Widens
The heart of any camera is its sensor, and this is where the two diverge most dramatically.

The Samsung WB250F employs a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55mm, packing 14 megapixels. This sensor size is typical for superzoom compacts, optimized for a vast zoom range (24-432mm equivalent) but limited inherently by physical size. A small sensor struggles with dynamic range, noise at high ISOs, and shallow depth-of-field effects.
In contrast, the Sony A7R III sports a full-frame 35.9x24mm BSI-CMOS sensor with a whopping 42.4 megapixels. This is a professional-grade sensor that captures extraordinary detail, offers outstanding dynamic range (around 14.7 EV measured at base ISO), and performs impressively in low light thanks to its larger photosites and backside illumination technology.
In hands-on field tests, the WB250F’s images shine in good daylight with decent sharpness and color but falter quickly as ISO climbs beyond 800, exhibiting noise and loss of detail. The fixed lens’s maximum aperture ranging f/3.2-5.8 limits creative control, especially for portraits and low-light scenes.
By comparison, the Sony’s images impress consistently - delivering extremely sharp, nuanced results with excellent tonal gradation. Its lack of antialiasing filter allows for finer detail rendition, and the camera maintains admirable color accuracy. Skin tones in portrait shots, foliage in landscapes, or fine feathers in wildlife subjects all pop with natural vibrance.
If ultimate image quality is your priority, nothing else comes close to the Sony in this duo.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders - Framing Your Shot
Both cameras have 3-inch LCD screens, but they serve very different roles.

The Samsung WB250F’s 3” screen is a fixed TFT LCD with 460k-dot resolution, supporting touch input. It works well enough for composing shots, reviewing images, and simple menu navigation. The fixed position means you can’t angle it for awkward high or low angles, which limits creativity somewhat.
The Sony A7R III offers a 3” tilting LCD with a much higher 1.44M-dot resolution. The screen is also touch-enabled, allowing fast focus point selection and menu navigation - a real time saver when shooting quickly. The tilting mechanism enables shooting from waist level or overhead, highly valuable in street or macro photography.
More crucially, the Sony includes a high-resolution electronic viewfinder with 3.68 million dots, covering 100% of the frame and a magnification factor of 0.78x. This EVF is a game-changer for precision framing, reviewing exposure, and focusing. The WB250F lacks any viewfinder, making outdoor use under bright sun more challenging.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus performance can make or break capturing fleeting moments, especially in wildlife or sports.
The Samsung uses a contrast-detection AF system with face detection and a few selectable AF areas, working reasonably well for static or slow-moving subjects. It offers single and tracking AF modes, but its accuracy and speed are often sluggish, especially in low light or complex scenes.
By contrast, the Sony A7R III boasts a tremendously advanced hybrid AF system combining 425 phase-detection points with contrast detection, spread generously across the frame. This delivers fast, confident focus locks even on erratically moving subjects. The camera incorporates real-time eye AF for both humans and animals, a feature I found invaluable for portraiture and wildlife studies alike - allowing consistent sharpness on the eyes, even when your subject is moving unpredictably.
The A7R III also supports continuous AF tracking in high-speed burst shooting, making it superb for action, sports, and wildlife photography. The burst frame rate is 10fps, compared to a more modest 8fps for the Samsung, but the Sony maintains AF tracking throughout the sequence, a decisive advantage.
Lens System and Compatibility
The Samsung WB250F is limited by its integrated 24-432mm f/3.2-5.8 zoom lens - versatile in focal range but fixed in aperture. This limitation curtails creative flexibility, especially in low light or when striving for dramatic bokeh backgrounds.
The Sony A7R III, on the other hand, uses the Sony E-mount system, with access to over 120 native lenses ranging from ultra-wide primes to super-telephoto zooms. This extensive ecosystem lets professionals and enthusiasts tailor their setup precisely to their needs - from sharp macro lenses to fast portrait primes or weather-sealed telephoto zooms for wildlife.
In practice, this means the Sony is vastly more adaptable across genres and shooting situations. Whether I’m shooting landscapes on a 16-35mm f/2.8, portraits on an 85mm f/1.4, or macro scenes close-up, the A7R III snaps perform reliably every time. The Samsung’s fixed lens simply cannot match this level of creative control.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
The Samsung is a compact with a plastic body and no weather sealing, suitable primarily for fair-weather casual use. It requires careful handling to avoid damage from dust, moisture, or impact.
The Sony A7R III, however, is built like a tank - with magnesium alloy chassis and comprehensive weather sealing protecting it against dust and moisture. While not waterproof or freeze-proof, it is rugged enough for professional outdoor use in a variety of conditions. I’ve taken the A7R III into rain, dusty beaches, and cold nights without issue, trusting it to keep running.
Both cameras lack shockproof or crushproof claims, but clearly the Sony is designed for a more demanding environment.
Battery Life and Storage
The Samsung WB250F’s battery life isn’t prominently specified but generally, cameras in its class manage around 200-300 shots per charge - suitable for casual weekend use but limiting for prolonged sessions.
The Sony A7R III impresses with its excellent battery life - rated for around 650 shots per charge using the NP-FZ100 battery. This is remarkable among mirrorless cameras and a relief for professional workflows where swapping batteries mid-shoot is often disruptive.
Storage-wise, the Samsung supports a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, while the Sony offers dual SD card slots, supporting the high-speed UHS-II standard on one slot for better write speeds and backup - critical for professional workflows managing large RAW files.
Video Capabilities
For videographers, the difference is night and day.
The Samsung WB250F records Full HD 1080p at 30fps, using older MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. It lacks microphone or headphone ports, and stabilization relies on the optical steady shot in the lens. Its video is decent for casual clips but limited in creative control.
The Sony A7R III is a serious hybrid camera, offering 4K UHD video at up to 30fps, leveraging full pixel readout without pixel binning for sharp, detailed footage. It supports multiple formats including XAVC S and AVCHD, plus advanced video features like S-Log3 for wide dynamic range capture.
Audio control is professional-grade, with microphone and headphone jacks for monitoring, plus built-in headphone volume controls during recording. The in-body 5-axis image stabilization significantly smooths handheld video.
If video quality and versatility matter to you, the A7R III is in a league of its own here.
Practical Photography Genres Tested Side-By-Side
To get a sense of real-world strengths and weaknesses, I put both cameras through their paces across a range of shooting scenarios - the results are telling.
Portrait Photography
Thanks to the large full-frame sensor and fast lens compatibility, the Sony A7R III produces exquisite portraits with rich, natural skin tones and creamy bokeh that isolate subjects beautifully. Eye AF locks precision focus on the iris even when your subject moves, a feature I personally find indispensable.
The WB250F’s small sensor and slower aperture mean flatter images and less control over background blur. Skin tones are acceptable in good light but lack nuance, and face detection AF sometimes hunts.
Landscape Photography
Here, the Sony’s dynamic range and resolution shine - I captured sweeping vistas with remarkable detail in highlights and shadows. The camera’s weather sealing gave me peace of mind shooting along misty coastal cliffs.
The Samsung handles landscapes under bright sunlight satisfactorily, but struggle in high contrast scenes with shadow recovery and minor chromatic aberrations visible on long zoom shots.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The A7R III’s autofocus speed and tracking, combined with high burst rate, make it ideal for fast-moving animals or athletes. Paired with long telephoto lenses, it dogs targets with granularity.
The WB250F, while offering considerable zoom reach, cannot maintain focus on erratic subjects reliably, limiting its usefulness for serious wildlife or sports.
Street Photography
Samsung’s small body is less intimidating and easier to slip into a pocket, making candid shots easier to capture discreetly.
Sony’s bigger size can draw attention, but the silent shutter mode and EVF’s real-time preview assist in sneaky shooting. The tilting screen also aids low-angle shots unobtrusively.
Macro Photography
Without dedicated macro mode or lens compatibility, the Samsung is outmatched. The Sony’s lens selection includes excellent macro glass with effective image stabilization and precise manual focus aids for detailed close-ups.
Night and Astro
Sony’s high ISO capability, sensor noise control, and ability to shoot long exposures with custom settings deliver stunning astrophotography results.
Samsung’s ISO ceiling of 3200 and smaller sensor yield noisier low light images, making night shots challenging.
Travel Photography
Samsung scores in weight and size, plus built-in wireless connectivity for quick sharing.
Sony accommodates diverse shooting styles with lens interchangeability, professional image quality, and robust battery life - making it a travel companion for serious image makers, albeit heavier.
Professional Workflows
The Sony supports RAW files, dual card slots, extensive custom controls, and integration with tethering software - standard requirements for pros.
The Samsung’s lack of RAW support and more limited options means it’s unsuitable for demanding professional work.
Wireless, Connectivity, and Extras
Both cameras boast built-in wireless features but the Sony includes Bluetooth and NFC for seamless device pairing, Wi-Fi for remote capture and image transfer, and USB 3.1 for fast data offload.
Samsung offers Wi-Fi but lacks Bluetooth and HDMI ports. The Sony’s micro-HDMI output enhances compatibility with external monitors or recorders.
Overall Performance Scores and Summary
It’s useful to see a summarized performance comparison to get a bird's eye view.
The Sony A7R III scores near the top in image quality, autofocus, video, and build, reflecting its status as a best-in-class professional mirrorless camera. The Samsung WB250F has respectable scores for zoom capabilities and portability but trails in nearly every other category.
Genre-specific performance scores make this even clearer:
Gallery: Samples from Both Cameras
Let’s take a look at direct comparisons of image samples shot on both cameras in identical conditions:
Notice the sharpness, color rendition, and dynamic range differences. The Sony clearly produces more versatile, higher quality files suitable for large prints or heavy editing. The Samsung’s shots excel mostly in well-lit, casual snapshot conditions.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
After thoroughly testing these two cameras across many disciplines, I want to give you clear advice depending on your photography goals and budget.
Choose the Samsung WB250F if you:
- Are looking for a simple, affordable superzoom compact camera at around $250
- Prefer an ultra-lightweight, pocketable design for everyday snapshots or casual travel
- Mostly shoot in good lighting conditions and want straightforward point-and-shoot functionality
- Want built-in Wi-Fi for quick sharing without fuss
- Do not require RAW support or extensive manual controls
Opt for the Sony A7R III if you:
- Demand top-tier image quality for professions like portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, or studio work
- Value extensive lens options and creative control with interchangeable glass
- Need fast, reliable autofocus with eye and animal detection for capturing elusive subjects
- Shoot serious video with high resolution and professional audio support
- Require rugged build and weather sealing for demanding conditions
- Want advanced workflow features such as dual card slots, RAW capture, and ACR compatibility
- Are willing to invest around $2800 for a full-frame mirrorless camera that will serve for years
Final Thoughts: Photography Is About Your Vision More Than Gear - But Gear Helps
As someone who has tested thousands of cameras personally and professionally, I can say with confidence that no camera fits every user perfectly. The Samsung WB250F is a charming, competent compact for casual shooters, travel light-packs, and social sharers. The Sony A7R III is a dream machine for photographers who seek image quality, creative control, and flexibility across all genres and lighting environments.
If you want to unleash your inner artist, invest in technology that supports your vision over the long term, and don’t mind carrying and learning a pro-level mirrorless rig - the A7R III is a brilliant choice. If budget and portability are paramount, and you simply want a versatile zoom camera to capture memories effortlessly, the WB250F is a steady companion.
Photography is about capturing moments, stories, and emotion - and the right equipment can be a powerful enabler. I hope my insights help you find the camera that empowers your next creative adventure.
Happy shooting!
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A7R III Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha A7R III |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2017-10-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 7952 x 5304 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 425 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 657 gr (1.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 100 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3523 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
| Card slots | 1 | Dual |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $2,800 |