Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 III was unveiled 7 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-P2

 E-M10 III E-P2 
IntroducedAugust 2017April 2010More recent by 90 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 E-P2 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2

 E-M10 III E-P2 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III against the E-P2.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and E-P2 is 80 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and E-P2.

To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus E-M10 III to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography advice
73
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW files
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography factors
Olympus E-P2 Street photography factors
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition (410 grams)
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography info
69
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
bad battery power (300 shots)
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
67
comes with touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition (410 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
43
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery power (300 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Landscape photography camera
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
60
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (300 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging advice
32
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
heavier than competition (410 grams)
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus PEN E-P2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2017-08-31 2010-04-22
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 56
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 505
Other
Battery life 330 shots 300 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Launch price $650 $799