Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 7 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus PEN E-P2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-P2
E-M10 III | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | ![]() | April 2010 | More recent by 90 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-P2 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2
E-M10 III | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III against the E-P2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bad5/0bad54f4e5a13b652258be5ce36293d591aab8bc" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and E-P2 is 80 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de3c1/de3c19cbdcc05d7661be6fbbdf4e43da3b028229" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and E-P2.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus E-M10 III to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7956e/7956e3d8706f388652c84fbfc751ab13ef05c1ab" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f2bc/2f2bc3353d4c46615d03137b9b1211dbf1eedf25" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2010-04-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 300 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $650 | $799 |