Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Samsung WB30F and Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Samsung. The image resolution of the WB30F (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB30F was manufactured very close to the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the WB30F grades against the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB30F & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB30F Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Samsung WB800F
| WB30F | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung WB30F
| WB800F | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Samsung WB800F
| WB30F | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB30F enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB30F and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the WB30F and the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB30F and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB30F and WB800F.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB30F vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung WB30F | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | QVGA TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $180 | $300 |
