Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Renewed by Sigma SD1 Merrill
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Samsung WB30F and Sigma SD1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WB30F (16MP) and the SD1 (15MP) is relatively well matched but the WB30F (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB30F was manufactured 2 years after the SD1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WB30F grades against the SD1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB30F and Sigma SD1. The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB30F Gallery and Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sigma SD1
WB30F | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Samsung WB30F
SD1 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sigma SD1
WB30F | SD1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB30F has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB30F and Sigma SD1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WB30F compared to the SD1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB30F and SD1 is 96 and 77 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB30F and SD1.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB30F featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung WB30F will give extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WB30F will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB30F vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
Samsung WB30F | Sigma SD1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB30F | Sigma SD1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 2 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $180 | $2,339 |