Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
86 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Sigma DP2s
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and DP2x (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB350F was manufactured 2 years after the DP2x which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WB350F scores vs the DP2x with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP2x. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB350F Gallery and Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma DP2x
WB350F | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | February 2011 | More modern by 36 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Samsung WB350F
DP2x | WB350F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP2x
WB350F | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB350F has got physical measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2x has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WB350F versus the DP2x.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB350F and DP2x is 90 and 86 respectively.
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB350F and DP2x.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB350F because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung WB350F will give you more detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The younger WB350F should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB350F | Sigma DP2x |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.30 m |
Flash options | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 276g (0.61 pounds) | 280g (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $260 | $699 |