Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB350F versus Sony S2100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and S2100 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB350F was released 4 years later than the S2100 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the WB350F grades vs the S2100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB350F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB350F Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sony S2100
| WB350F | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Samsung WB350F
| S2100 | WB350F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sony S2100
| WB350F | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung WB350F enjoys external dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony S2100 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB350F versus Sony S2100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the WB350F and the S2100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB350F and S2100 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The visual below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WB350F and S2100.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung WB350F to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger WB350F will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB350F vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 276g (0.61 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $260 | $0 |