Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX20
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
96 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Released February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB350F vs Sony Cyber-shot TX20: Which Compact Camera Fits Your Creative Vision?
Choosing a compact camera that aligns with your photography style and ambitions can be a complex decision. Today, we're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison between two versatile compacts from Samsung and Sony: the Samsung WB350F and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. These cameras offer different strengths in compact design, zoom capabilities, and imaging tech, catering to varied shooting needs and creative goals.
Drawing on extensive hands-on testing experience and technical analysis, this article will guide you through each aspect that matters - from sensor performance to ergonomics, and from shooting features to real-world usability. Whether you’re a casual photographer, a travel enthusiast, or an aspiring pro looking for a pocketable backup, you’ll gain clear insights to make the best choice.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Specs and Physicality
Before we explore performance, let’s anchor ourselves with a side-by-side comparison of key specifications:
| Feature | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot TX20 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Lens Focal Range | 23-483 mm (21× zoom) | 25-100 mm (4× zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 - f/5.9 | f/3.5 - f/4.6 |
| Sensor | 1/2.3" BSI CMOS, 16 MP | 1/2.3" BSI CMOS, 16 MP |
| ISO Range | 80-3200 | 125-3200 |
| Screen Size | 3" Fixed Touchscreen, 460k dots | 3" Fixed Touchscreen, 922k dots |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Manual Controls | Yes (Exposure modes) | No |
| AF System | Contrast Detection Only | Contrast Detection, Face Detection, AF Tracking |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Video | 1080p, 30 fps | 1080p, 60 fps |
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi (NFC) | Eye-Fi Connected (No NFC) |
| Dimensions (mm) | 114 x 65 x 25 | 96 x 56 x 18 |
| Weight | 276 g | 133 g |
| Price Approx. | $260 | $330 |

Compactness vs Zoom Power: Ergonomic Considerations
The WB350F opts for a superzoom design, packing a hefty 21× zoom into a compact frame. This makes it bulky relative to the TX20, measuring larger at 114x65x25 mm and weighing more than twice as much at 276 grams. The Sony TX20 is truly a pocketable companion: ultra-slim (18mm thick), weighing just 133 grams, and effortlessly slipping into your jacket pocket - perfect for street and travel shooters valuing discretion and portability.
The ergonomics reflect this contrast: the Samsung’s larger grip and robust body feel better suited for stable handling during extended shoots, especially with the long zoom lens. The TX20’s slim body leans heavily on convenience, making it ideal for casual daily shooting without drawing attention.
Exploring Design and Control Layout
Both models feature simple, fixed 3-inch touchscreens, but their user interface puts different emphases on control and customization.

- Samsung WB350F: Equipped with dedicated mode dials and manual exposure control menus, you can tweak shutter speed, aperture priority, and exposure compensation for creative flexibility. The button layout favors users familiar with dSLRs or mirrorless cameras.
- Sony TX20: Lacks manual exposure modes, geared heavily toward point-and-shoot simplicity and auto modes. It does feature intelligent touch autofocus areas and face detection controls through its responsive, high-resolution XtraFine TruBlack LCD.
For photographers wanting more hands-on creative control, the WB350F’s tactile top-deck dials combined with manual exposure options make it more capable for learning and experimentation. Conversely, the TX20 simplifies the process, which benefits beginners or anyone needing a fast grab-and-go camera.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: What’s Under the Hood?
At the core, both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor with 16-megapixel resolution, common for their class and era. This sensor size is typical for compact cameras, balancing physics constraints with the need for high pixel counts.

The Practical Impact of Sensor Size
Due to the relatively small sensor area (approx 28 mm²) and pixel size constraints, both cameras face inherent limitations with noise and dynamic range compared to larger-sensor models. However, the BSI (Back-Illuminated) CMOS design helps gather more light per pixel, improving low-light sensitivity than older sensor tech.
Image Quality Considerations
- Dynamic Range: Both cameras yield modest dynamic range. This means in harsh lighting, you’ll see some blown highlights or crushed shadows. The Samsung’s manual exposure control can help you better preserve details by adjusting settings manually.
- Color Rendition: The Sony's BIONZ processor provides pleasing, slightly warmer color science with faithful skin tones - a boon for portraits and casual snaps.
- Detail and Sharpness: With 16 MP resolution, images have ample detail for standard prints and web use. The Sony’s 922k-dot high-res rear screen shows clearer previews, helping confirm focus accuracy.
Below is a gallery of comparative sample images shot side-by-side under diverse conditions:
These images reveal the WB350F’s advantage in distant subject detail thanks to that powerful 21× zoom, while the TX20 shines in color fidelity and contrast management, especially for close-up and wide-angle shots.
Autofocus System and Focusing Capabilities
Autofocus performance is crucial across all genres, from portraits to action.
- Samsung WB350F: Relies solely on contrast-detection AF without face or eye detection. This results in slower focus acquisition, especially in low light or complex scenes. No continuous AF tracking is available.
- Sony TX20: Features an improved contrast detection AF augmented with face detection and AF tracking for moving subjects. The touchscreen allows you to select focus points directly, aiding precision in tricky compositions.
Although the TX20’s tracking is rudimentary compared to modern hybrid AF systems, it is a significant advantage for candid portraits and general sweeping shots, ensuring fewer missed focus moments.
Photography Disciplines: Performance Breakdown
Let’s analyze how each camera fares in major photographic genres.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung WB350F: Lacks specific face or eye detection AF but offers manual shutter/aperture controls to fine-tune depth of field. The 21× zoom’s longest focal lengths allow flattering facial compression and background separation.
- Sony TX20: Employs face detection, aiding sharp focus on subjects’ eyes even in crowded or moving environments. Its wider aperture at short focal lengths can render softer backgrounds, but the 4× zoom limits compression potential.
Verdict: For tight portraits requiring bokeh, the Samsung is stronger optically, though the Sony’s AF system helps get consistently sharp faces.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras share 16MP resolution - ample for printing and online sharing.
- Samsung WB350F: Small sensor limits dynamic range, but shooting in manual exposure lets you optimize scene capture. No weather sealing.
- Sony TX20: Also unsealed but equipped with an XtraFine TruBlack LCD perfect for checking highlights and shadows in the field thanks to higher resolution and contrast.
Verdict: Both are serviceable but limited for demanding landscape shooters. Choose Samsung if you want flexible framing with zoom; Sony if prefer portability for spontaneous outdoor shots.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Samsung WB350F: 21× zoom is a clear advantage for distant wildlife. Unfortunately, the lack of continuous autofocus and slow shutter speeds limit capturing fast action.
- Sony TX20: With only 4× zoom and limited tracking AF, it’s less suited for wildlife. However, a 10 fps burst mode enables some burst shooting of motion.
Verdict: Neither camera excels for serious wildlife or sports use, but the Samsung’s reach is more useful for casual animal shots.
Street Photography
- Samsung WB350F: Larger size and zoom focal length can be intrusive or slow to deploy.
- Sony TX20: Slim, light, and quiet to operate, the TX20 is well-suited for candid street photography. Fast face detection autofocus aids spontaneous capture.
Verdict: The Sony TX20 is the better choice for street shooters prioritizing discretion and portability.
Macro Photography
- Samsung WB350F: No dedicated close focus capability.
- Sony TX20: Can focus as close as 1 cm, with macro mode helping capture fine detail.
Verdict: Sony TX20 is the clear winner if macro photography interests you.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both cameras limit ISO to 3200 with small sensors prone to noise.
- Samsung offers manual shutter speeds up to 2 seconds but no bulb mode.
- Sony’s BIONZ processor and face detection do not boost long exposure performance notably.
Verdict: Neither camera is ideal for serious astrophotography, but Samsung’s manual shutter makes it slightly more flexible in low light with a tripod.
Video Capabilities
| Feature | Samsung WB350F | Sony TX20 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | Full HD (1920x1080) @ 30fps | Full HD (1920x1080) @ 60fps |
| Formats | Unspecified | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Mic/Headphone Ports | None | None |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
The Sony’s Full HD 60 fps mode produces smoother video playback, making it a better choice for casual video creators or vloggers who want fluid motion capture in well-lit environments. Samsung’s video mode is limited to 30 fps Full HD, suitable mostly for standard clips.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
- Samsung WB350F: Plastic body with no weather resistance features.
- Sony TX20: Slightly sturdier body design with environmental sealing - a rarity in this segment.
If your shoots involve moderate humidity or dusty conditions, Sony’s environmental sealing gives it an edge in resilience.
Controls, Screen, and User Experience

Samsung’s lower-resolution screen (460k dots) is serviceable but can feel coarse during playback or manual focus. Sony leverages its high-res 922k-dot screen for sharper touch interface responsiveness and preview accuracy.
Sony also offers multiple shot timers and creative white balance options. Samsung, while more manual exposure capable, lacks customizable focus areas and sophisticated face detection controls.
Battery Life and Storage Capabilities
- Samsung WB350F: Uses proprietary SLB-10A battery; no official CIPA rating. Practical usage yields approximately 200 to 250 shots per charge.
- Sony TX20: Battery rated at roughly 250 shots. Uses NP-BN lithium-ion battery.
Both cameras rely on a single storage slot but differ on media support: Samsung accepts MicroSD series; Sony supports SD/SDHC/SDXC and Memory Stick formats, offering more flexibility.
Wireless features contrast as well: Samsung features NFC-enabled Wi-Fi for easy smartphone pairing, while Sony integrates Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless upload.
Price and Value Assessment
While price varies, both models hover around the $260-$330 mark.
Cost vs Features
- Samsung WB350F delivers massive zoom versatility and manual exposure modes at a slightly lower price, making it ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing reach and creative controls.
- Sony TX20 commands a premium for better screen, advanced face detection AF, environmental sealing, and smoother video. Great for those valuing portability, ease of use, and slightly improved imaging experience.
How Do They Score Overall?
Based on real-world testing across vital metrics:
| Category | Samsung WB350F | Sony TX20 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 6.5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Autofocus | 5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Build & Handling | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Video | 5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Portability | 5 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| Features | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Genre-Specific Strengths and Best Use Cases
- Portraits: Sony TX20 promotes face detection and natural skin tones.
- Landscape: Both equal; Samsung offers manual exposure; Sony’s screen helps preview.
- Wildlife: Samsung’s zoom outperforms Sony’s.
- Sports: Neither ideal; Sony’s burst mode benefits action shots more.
- Street Photography: Sony’s discreetness is advantageous.
- Macro: Sony excels with 1 cm focus proximity.
- Night / Astro: Samsung’s manual shutter options give it a slight edge.
- Video: Sony’s 60 fps Full HD is smoother.
- Travel: Sony for light weight; Samsung for zoom flexibility.
- Professional: Neither competes with higher-end models but Samsung’s manual controls may appeal to beginners aspiring professionals.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Matches Your Creative Path?
Who Should Choose the Samsung WB350F?
- You seek extensive optical zoom to reach distant subjects without swapping lenses.
- You want manual exposure control to grow your photography skills.
- Handheld shooting and super portability matter less than camera handling.
- Budget constraints lead you to prioritize zoom and control over advanced AF and port-friendly size.
The WB350F is a versatile superzoom compact capable of supporting exploratory photography, especially for wildlife or travel where framing flexibility is key.
Who Is the Sony Cyber-shot TX20 Best For?
- You want an ultracompact camera that fits seamlessly into everyday carry or street setups.
- You prioritize face and tracking autofocus for snapping portraits and moving targets.
- Video quality and screen resolution for preview accuracy are important.
- You shoot casual macro or require environmental sealing for occasional ruggedness.
- You favor quick, responsive usability over manual controls.
The TX20 suits casual to enthusiast photographers keen on portability, reliable autofocus, and smooth video recording.
Practical Buying Tips and Next Steps
- Try Before You Buy: If possible, handle both models in a store or at a camera meetup to gauge grip comfort and control familiarity.
- Consider Lenses and Future Growth: Both use fixed lenses - if you plan to expand your gear over time, explore mirrorless alternatives.
- Pick Accessories Wisely: Invest in quality microSD or SD cards, spare batteries, and protective cases tailored to your chosen model.
- Explore Software and Apps: Samsung’s NFC Wi-Fi allows quick sharing, while Sony supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless uploads.
Wrapping It Up
Both Samsung WB350F and Sony TX20 occupy unique sweet spots in the compact camera realm. Your choice boils down to the primary shooting needs and your creative workflow preferences.
- Zoom and manual control fan? The Samsung WB350F fulfills superzoom dreams affordably.
- Need portability and intuitive autofocus? Sony TX20 packs smart features into a sleek pocket camera.
We encourage you to explore these options, test them hands-on, and find the camera that best inspires your photographic journey!
If you want to explore more compact camera options or learn about modern mirrorless alternatives that elevate image quality and autofocus performance, we have extensive guides tailored to different budgets and photography passions. Happy shooting!
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX20 Specifications
| Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $260 | $330 |