Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched January 2013
- Older Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the WB35F (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB35F was launched 13 months later than the DP3 Merrill making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the WB35F grades versus the DP3 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
WB35F | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2013 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung WB35F
DP3 Merrill | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP3 Merrill
WB35F | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB35F comes with outer dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP3 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WB35F against the DP3 Merrill.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and DP3 Merrill is 93 and 83 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB35F and DP3 Merrill.
All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB35F featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung WB35F will give greater detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WB35F provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 330 gr (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70A | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $130 | $1,353 |