Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Older Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill: An Expert Comparison to Find Your Ideal Camera

Choosing the right camera is a pivotal step in your photography journey. Today we’re taking a deep dive into two very different compact cameras - the budget-friendly Samsung WB35F superzoom and the high-end large sensor Sigma DP3 Merrill. Both cater to compact form factors but serve vastly different goals and creative ambitions.

Having personally tested hundreds of cameras across genres - from wildlife to portraiture - I’ll guide you through how these two models perform in real-world scenarios, what technical trade-offs they demand, and who should consider either. Whether you’re dipping toes into photography or need a highly specialized tool, this comparison brings clarity for informed decisions.

A Snapshot of the Contenders: Specs at a Glance

Feature Samsung WB35F Sigma DP3 Merrill
Camera Type Small Sensor Superzoom (Compact) Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Size 1/2.3” CCD (6.17x4.55mm) APS-C CMOS Foveon X3 (24x16mm)
Resolution 16MP (4608x3456) 15MP (4704x3136)
Lens Fixed 24-288mm eq. (12× zoom), f/3.1-6.3 Fixed 75mm eq., f/2.8
ISO Range 80 – 3200 100 – 6400
Screen 2.7" fixed LCD, 230k dots 3" fixed LCD, 920k dots
Video 1280x720 HD 640x480 VGA
Stabilization Optical Image Stabilization None
Weight 194g 330g
Price at Launch ~$130 ~$1350

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison
Physical size and ergonomics: Samsung WB35F is smaller and more pocketable, while Sigma DP3 Merrill is bulkier due to its larger sensor and prime lens.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Tiny vs Big

Samsung WB35F: Small Sensor, Classic CCD

The WB35F uses a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor - typical for compact superzooms. This sensor size is physically small (roughly 28 mm²), meaning each photosite captures limited light, impacting dynamic range and low-light noise performance. The CCD architecture tends to reproduce colors well but lags behind modern CMOS sensors in noise handling and speed.

At 16 megapixels, the sensor’s pixel density is relatively high, which contributes to noise at higher ISO values beyond 800–1600. Moreover, lack of RAW support limits post-processing flexibility.

Sigma DP3 Merrill: The Foveon X3 APS-C Game-Changer

Sigma’s DP3 Merrill sports a unique APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor with approximately 384 mm² of active area - a huge leap from the WB35F. The Foveon sensor uses layered photodiodes to capture full color information at every pixel location, resulting in exceptional color fidelity and sharpness without a color filter array.

With 15 megapixels based on Foveon’s approach, image detail stands out in textures, especially critical for portraits and product photography. The higher native ISO 100-6400 range handles low light better - though noise performance beyond ISO 800 still requires cautious evaluation.

The big sensor and distinct architecture allow much richer dynamic range and superior tonal gradations than compact CCD-based cameras.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison
Sensor size comparison: Sigma's APS-C sensor dwarfs Samsung’s 1/2.3” CCD, underpinning its superior image quality potential.

Lenses and Focal Range: Versatile Zoom vs Prime Focus

Samsung WB35F: 24-288mm Superzoom Convenience

The WB35F offers a 12× zoom lens starting at 24mm wide-angle equivalent and extending to a 288mm telephoto reach. Practical for travel, casual snapshots, and subject variety, this range covers landscapes, portraits, and distant subjects reasonably well.

However, the max aperture narrows significantly at the telephoto end to f/6.3, limiting low-light/fast-action performance and background blur capability. The fixed lens means no upgrades, but you get a decent all-in-one without changing glass.

Sigma DP3 Merrill: A Sharp, Fast 75mm Prime

The DP3 Merrill pairs its large sensor with a 75mm f/2.8 prime lens (about 1× crop factor), ideal for portraiture and still life. The moderately telephoto focal length provides flattering compression for skin tones and excellent subject isolation with shallow depth of field.

Without zoom, you must zoom with your feet - a constraint to consider for general walk-around shooting. However, the fast aperture allows better low-light capture and sharper optics with less distortion.

Handling and Ergonomics: Comfort vs Control

The Samsung WB35F is a very compact camera with a simplified, pocketable design. Weighing just 194 grams and measuring 101×61×28 mm, it’s made for easy travel and casual shooting. The back features a small 2.7” fixed LCD with modest 230k-dot resolution, enough for framing but limited for detailed reviewing or touch controls.

In contrast, the Sigma DP3 Merrill is larger and heavier at 330 grams and sizeable body depth (59mm). Its 3” LCD boasts a bright, high-res 920k-dot panel with excellent viewing angles for critical focus assessment. Being a more professional tool, it lacks touchscreen but offers manual focus controls and classic exposure modes.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison
Top view control layout: Samsung favors minimalism, while Sigma exposes dedicated dials and buttons for manual exposure and precision.

Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: Quick and Easy vs Meticulous and Manual

When it comes to autofocus, both cameras take different approaches:

  • Samsung WB35F: Primarily a point-and-shoot without continuous or face-detection AF. It lacks multiple AF points and advanced tracking, relying on basic contrast-detect autofocus. This suffices for daylight and casual photography but less so for fast-moving subjects.

  • Sigma DP3 Merrill: Focus is totally manual with no autofocus system at all. This places emphasis on photographer skill and preference for methodical shooting. The DP3 Merrill includes manual aperture, shutter priority, and full manual exposure modes, catering to deliberate workflows.

Continuous shooting speeds are modest: Samsung doesn’t officially specify burst capacity; Sigma offers 4 fps max - enough for still-life or controlled action but not sports.

Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance

The Samsung WB35F includes optical image stabilization, crucial for handholding at long zoom ranges or in dim lighting. This feature helps mitigate blur and extends handheld usability.

The Sigma DP3 Merrill has no stabilization - relying on tripod use or steady hands especially in lower light. However, its larger sensor and f/2.8 aperture permit cleaner images at higher ISO, somewhat compensating.

Low-light performance by convenience heavily favors the Sigma. The Samsung’s small sensor and max ISO 3200 limit usable noise-free results. The Sigma can theoretically push ISO 6400, but image noise and Foveon sensor characteristics may demand careful exposure.

Video Capabilities: Modest vs Minimal

Video is a minor strength for both cameras:

  • Samsung WB35F: Records up to 1280x720 HD video - a basic but serviceable resolution for casual clips. No live autofocus during video, no external mic input, and limited codec options restrict professional videography use.

  • Sigma DP3 Merrill: Offers only VGA (640x480) video in Motion JPEG format, which is outdated. No microphone jack or advanced video features exist, reflecting the camera’s focus on still imaging.

Storage, Battery Life, and Connectivity

  • Samsung supports microSD cards (SDHC and SDXC), while Sigma does not specify card type but typically uses standard SD cards. Both feature a single slot.

  • Battery life details are sparse, but Sigma cameras usually have moderate endurance due to large sensors and no video focus.

  • Samsung includes NFC wireless for instant sharing and remote control - handy for casual shooters. Sigma DP3 Merrill lacks any wireless connectivity.

Real-World Uses and Photography Style Suitability

Let’s break down how these cameras perform across popular photographic niches:

Portrait Photography

  • Sigma DP3 Merrill shines with its fast f/2.8 lens, large sensor, and superb color rendition. The 75mm focal length is perfect for flattering portraits with creamy bokeh. Manual focus demands careful control but yields studio-like results on skin tones and details.

  • Samsung WB35F is less adept here. Small sensor noise impacts low-light portraits; max aperture and zoom lens limits subject isolation. Good for snapshot family or travel portraits in bright light.

Landscape Photography

  • Sigma’s high dynamic range and resolution excel at capturing intricate textures and tones. The fixed prime is limiting for framing flexibility, but the sharpness is outstanding.

  • Samsung offers zoom versatility for wide sweeping scenes or distant elements. However, small sensor and limited dynamic range mean compromise in shadow recovery and noise.

Wildlife and Sports

  • Samsung is preferred here given long zoom range and optical stabilization.

  • Sigma with manual focus and limited burst capacity is unsuitable for fast action or distant wildlife.

Street Photography

  • The small and lightweight Samsung is discreet and easy to grab quickly.

  • The larger size and manual focus of Sigma are more obtrusive, suited for deliberate compositions.

Macro Photography

  • Neither camera advertises close-up capability, but Sigma’s sharp lens and large sensor yield better texture capture when close focusing.

Night/Astro Photography

  • Sigma wins again with better high ISO, aperture, and dynamic range.

  • Samsung’s small sensor and limited ISO make night photography challenging.

Travel Photography

  • Samsung’s compact form, zoom lens, and wireless sharing make it an all-round travel companion.

  • Sigma serves more specialized travel needs - portraiture, cultural shots with fine detail - but demands tripod and thoughtful planning.

Professional Workflows

  • Sigma DP3 Merrill supports RAW files and varied exposure modes, integrating well into professional editing workflows.

  • Samsung shoots only JPEG with basic controls, limiting professional utility.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Rear LCD comparison: Sigma's high-resolution panel enables detailed review and focus confirmation compared to Samsung’s basic screen.

Detailed Technical Breakdown

Aspect Samsung WB35F Sigma DP3 Merrill
Sensor Type CCD 1/2.3" (Small sensor) Foveon X3 APS-C CMOS
Image Processing Unknown proprietary Dual TRUE II engine
Autofocus Type Contrast detect, basic Manual focus only
Exposure Control Fully automatic, no manual modes Full manual, shutter/aperture priority
Image Stabilization Optical (lens-based) None
Viewfinder None None
White Balance Customizable Customizable
Connectivity Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC USB 2.0 only
Weight 194g 330g
Body Material Plastic compact - limited durability Robust plastic with grip ergonomics
Lens Construction Unknown composite lens elements High quality, fixed prime optics
File Formats JPEG only JPEG, RAW (X3F)
Battery Rechargeable BP70A (exact life not stated) Rechargeable (details unspecified)


Sample image gallery side-by-side: Notice Sigma’s richer colors and finer detail, versus Samsung’s more limited tonal range.

Who Should Choose the Samsung WB35F?

  • Budget-conscious photographers seeking an all-in-one travel camera.
  • Beginners or casual users wanting a compact, easy-to-use camera with a versatile zoom lens.
  • Photographers prioritizing portability and wireless sharing features.
  • Those content with JPEG output and automatic modes.
  • Anyone wanting a lightweight point-and-shoot for everyday snapshots, landscapes, or distant subjects in good lighting.

Who Should Opt for the Sigma DP3 Merrill?

  • Enthusiasts or pros who demand maximum image quality and color fidelity in a compact form.
  • Photographers specializing in portrait, product, or fine art photography needing precise manual control.
  • Users comfortable with manual focus and deliberate shooting workflows.
  • Those wanting RAW workflow support and fine tonal rendition.
  • Creative individuals who prioritize detail and sharpness over zoom versatility.
  • Studio and outdoor shooters prepared to carry heavier gear and use tripods.


Overall performance ratings reflect Sigma’s superior image quality and manual control against Samsung’s value and portability.

Conclusion: Two Cameras for Two Different Paths

While the Samsung WB35F offers accessible superzoom convenience and wireless sharing at an affordable price, its small sensor and limited controls confine it largely to casual photography contexts.

On the other hand, the Sigma DP3 Merrill targets a niche of photographers who place uncompromising image quality and color performance first, accepting manual operation and higher cost as a trade-off.

What you pick depends on your priorities:

  • Want a simple pocket camera to capture family trips and landscapes? Samsung WB35F is a friendly, lightweight choice.

  • Crave crisp detail, rich color, and creative depth control for portraits and artistic work? Invest in the Sigma DP3 Merrill and master its manual ethos.


Genre-specific performance analysis highlights Sigma’s dominance in portrait and studio applications, versus Samsung’s flexibility for travel and casual shooting.

Getting the Most From Your Choice

Whichever camera you select:

  • Try hands-on first. Handling ergonomics and shooting feel matter greatly. Visit stores or rental services to compare grip and responsiveness.

  • Invest in accessories. For Samsung: extra memory cards and battery packs. For Sigma: perhaps a sturdy tripod, wireless remote, and external flash for creative control.

  • Explore tutorials and communities. Engage with forums, videos, and hands-on workshops tailored to your camera model and photography style.

Final Recommendation: Match Gear to Creative Goals

In summary, the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP3 Merrill occupy different realms of compact photography. Your choice should align with:

  • Your budget
  • Your desire for control vs convenience
  • Primary photography genres
  • Weight and portability needs

Our expert testing confirms: there’s no one-size-fits-all. Equip yourself thoughtfully, and each of these cameras can inspire your photographic journey in distinctive ways. Now it’s your turn to get out there and create!

For more reviews and camera insights, check out our full guides and hands-on tutorials to accelerate your growth as a photographer. Your next great shot is just a camera away.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Samsung WB35FSigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB35F Sigma DP3 Merrill
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-01-07 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) 75mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s -
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 lb) 330 gr (0.73 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $130 $1,353