Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB35F versus Sony W290, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and W290 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WB35F was brought out 4 years after the W290 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WB35F scores versus the W290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB35F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony W290
| WB35F | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Samsung WB35F
| W290 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony W290
| WB35F | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F offers outside measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony W290 has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB35F versus Sony W290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the WB35F vs the W290.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and W290 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and W290.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to deliver more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger WB35F should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB35F vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $230 |