Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
54
Features
80
Overall
64

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed August 2010
  • Newer Model is Sony A35
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the A33 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the WB35F (1/2.3") and A33 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB35F was introduced 3 years later than the A33 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WB35F grades vs the A33 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A33

 WB35F A33 
RevealedJanuary 2014August 2010Fresher by 42 months

Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Samsung WB35F

 A33 WB35F 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A33

 WB35F A33 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F has got external dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A33 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WB35F compared to the A33.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and A33 is 93 and 67 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and A33.

To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB35F having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung WB35F will give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WB35F provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
Sony A33 Portrait photography highlights
37
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
72
focusing manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F Street photography highlights
Sony A33 Street photography highlights
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
76
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
Sony A33 as a Sports photography camera
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
not so great battery life (340 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography factors
Sony A33 Travel photography factors
70
lighter than competition (194g)
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
61
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery life (340 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A33 as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
67
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
not so great battery life (340 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
Sony A33 as a Vlogging camera
31
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
77
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony A33
 Samsung WB35FSony SLT-A33
General Information
Make Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony SLT-A33
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2014-01-07 2010-08-24
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 lbs) 500 gr (1.10 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 591
Other
Battery life - 340 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $130 $230