Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
56
Features
57
Overall
56

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-F3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Samsung WB50F versus Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is pretty close but the WB50F (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WB50F was launched 2 years later than the NEX-C3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the WB50F matches up vs the NEX-C3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony NEX-C3

 WB50F NEX-C3 
IntroducedJanuary 2014August 2011Fresher by 29 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Samsung WB50F

 NEX-C3 WB50F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony NEX-C3

 WB50F NEX-C3 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB50F has physical dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB50F versus Sony NEX-C3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WB50F and the NEX-C3.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB50F and NEX-C3.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The WB50F uses the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF trickier. The newer WB50F will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB50F Portrait photography highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Portrait photography highlights
37
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung WB50F Street photography information
Sony NEX-C3 Street photography information
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
79
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (225g)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB50F
Sports photography with Sony NEX-C3
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
53
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good battery life (400 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition in class (207g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
good battery life (400 shots)
lighter than average in class (225g)
resolution is good (16MP)
missing Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Landscape photography camera
47
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
70
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (400 CIPA)
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Vlogging camera
30
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (207 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic jack
27
lighter than average in class (225g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB50F vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony NEX-C3
 Samsung WB50FSony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB50F Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2014-01-07 2011-08-22
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 207 gr (0.46 lb) 225 gr (0.50 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 1083
Other
Battery life - 400 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP70A NPFW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $180 $343