Samsung WB50F vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400: An Expert Superzoom Showdown for Photography Enthusiasts

When it comes to compact superzoom cameras, two models that often spark curiosity among enthusiasts and prosumer photographers alike are the Samsung WB50F and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. Both launched in early 2014, these cameras offer long zoom ranges packed in manageable bodies but ride vastly different design philosophies and feature sets.

Having put both through comprehensive hands-on testing, I’ll unpack their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world usability across photography genres and use cases. Whether you’re into landscapes, wildlife, or casual travel snaps, this head-to-head aims to guide you to the right tool based on performance, ergonomics, and value.

Let’s get started by sizing them up physically and ergonomically.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

In person, the Samsung WB50F impresses with its compactness and pocket-friendly form. Measuring just 101 x 68 x 27 mm and weighing 207 grams, it’s remarkably lightweight - a great advantage if you’re prioritizing portability for travel or casual day hikes.

Contrast that against the Sony H400, which is a full-on bridge camera in the style of an SLR, clocking in at a hefty 628 grams and measuring 130 x 95 x 122 mm. Its robust grip and physical heft feel much more substantial, which might suit users who prefer a camera with greater presence and stability, especially when wielding its massive zoom.

In terms of build quality, neither offers weather sealing or ruggedness features like dust or freeze proofing, so rough outdoor use demands some care.

Handling wise, the Samsung’s simpler, more compact chassis appeals for grab-and-go simplicity. The Sony’s larger body houses more physical controls, which can benefit users who want direct access to settings without diving into menus.

As you can see in the top view comparison, the Sony provides dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation - a boon for those who enjoy fine manual exposure control. The Samsung’s layout is more minimalist with no physical dials for changing key settings on the fly, reflecting its positioning as a straightforward point-and-shoot.

If you prefer a camera that blends portability with some manual tweakability, the Samsung is easier to tote daily. For those willing to carry more weight for control and zoom reach, the Sony’s ergonomy wins out.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: What Lies Beneath the Lens

Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, which at 6.17 x 4.55 mm is quite small compared to APS-C or full frame cameras. This is typical for superzoom compacts, trading sensor size for optical zoom reach within a pocketable frame.

The Samsung offers 16 megapixels, while the Sony ups this to 20 megapixels. However, this higher resolution is largely a result of pixel density rather than sensor size increase, and does not necessarily equate to better image quality.

In real-world testing, both cameras produce reasonably sharp images in good light. The Sony’s 20 MP resolution gives slightly more detail, but with smaller pixels comes increased noise at high ISOs, where image quality rapidly deteriorates - typical for CCDs of this generation.

Both are capped at ISO 3200, but I found the usable high ISO ceiling to be closer to ISO 400 for clean results, especially for prints or detailed viewing. The Samsung’s simpler image pipeline produces images fairly free of overprocessing, albeit a little muted.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing control - a major consideration for enthusiasts wanting to squeeze maximum image quality. JPEG compression artifacts become apparent when pushing exposures or colors.

Dynamic range is modest on both, with shadows crushing easily and highlights clipping under harsh contrast. If landscapes and nuanced tones matter most, these cameras will feel somewhat limiting, though they can suffice for casual shooting.

Autofocus and Zoom: Reaching Far and Locking Fast

Both cameras boast fixed lenses with colossal zoom ranges:

• Samsung WB50F: 24-288 mm equivalent (12x optical zoom), aperture f/3.1-6.3
• Sony H400: 25-1550 mm equivalent (63.3x optical zoom), aperture f/3.4-6.5

This gives the Sony a jaw-dropping telephoto reach that outclasses the Samsung by more than five times at the long end. Want to get close to distant wildlife or sports action without swapping lenses? The Sony easily out-zooms the Samsung.

However, with extreme zoom comes inherent challenges. The Sony’s lens is large and heavier, affecting balance and requiring very steady hands or a tripod at max reach to avoid shake. The Samsung’s shorter zoom is more flexible for handheld shooting.

Autofocus systems differ markedly:

• The Samsung features contrast-detection AF with no face or eye detection and no AF point selection - quite basic.
• The Sony provides single AF with contrast detection, face detection, center-weighted metering, and even AF tracking modes.

In practice, the Sony’s AF is more reliable for moving subjects, especially in good light. The Samsung’s AF can hunt more and is better suited for static scenes.

Neither camera offers continuous autofocus, and burst shooting modes are absent or limited - especially for action photography.

Screens and Viewfinders: How You Frame Your Shots

Both sport fixed 3-inch LCDs at 460k dots resolution, which is standard for entry-level compacts but low by today’s standards.

The Sony’s screen has “Clear Photo LCD” technology, offering better visibility in bright daylight compared to the Samsung’s standard LCD, making composition easier outdoors.

A big differentiator is the Sony’s inclusion of a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 201k dots resolution and 100% coverage. This might seem low-res compared to modern EVFs, but it’s immensely valuable for framing in bright sun where LCD glare becomes an issue. The Samsung lacks any EVF, relying solely on its rear screen.

For photographers who like shooting from the eye level or while walking, the Sony’s EVF offers clear advantages in stability and visibility.

Neither touchscreen or tilt/swivel features are present on either camera, which limits creative shooting angles and ease of interface navigation somewhat.

Real-World Photography Performance: Genre-by-Genre Insights

Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F screen back Sony H400 front Sony H400 screen back

Here’s how each camera fared when pushed through various photographic disciplines, based on my extensive test sessions:

Portrait Photography

Skin tone rendition is crucial here. The Sony’s 20MP sensor captures nicer color gradation and face detection aids in keeping portraits sharp. Bokeh quality is soft and sometimes a bit busy due to small sensor and limited aperture; however, the Sony’s wider zoom aperture at telephoto helps with subject isolation slightly better.

The Samsung suffers from flatter color and lacks face detection or eye autofocus, making it less ideal for selective focus portraits. Both cameras can produce passable portraits but neither can compete with larger sensor systems for creamy backgrounds or fine focus precision.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters benefit from resolution and dynamic range. Sony’s marginally higher resolution helps, but both struggled with clipping bright skies or losing detail in shadows under contrasty conditions.

Neither offers weather sealing, so care is warranted in outdoor conditions.

The Samsung’s compactness makes it easier to carry alongside other gear, while the Sony’s weight can become cumbersome on long hikes.

Wildlife Photography

For casual wildlife, Sony’s extraordinary 1550 mm zoom wins hands down. You can get shots of distant animals that the Samsung’s 288 mm cannot approach. However, AF speed and tracking remain basic compared to dedicated wildlife cameras.

The Samsung is better suited for backyard shooting or controlled environments.

Sports Photography

Both cameras fall short for fast action. Sony offers a maximum burst rate of 1 fps, which is very slow, and Samsung lacks continuous shooting altogether.

Tracking moving athletes or fast scenes is impractical on these cameras, so neither is recommended for serious sports photography.

Street Photography

Samsung’s compactness and discreet profile make it more street-friendly, allowing candid shots without attracting attention.

Sony’s larger form factor is more conspicuous and less comfortable for quick, unseen shooting.

Low light performance on both is lacking, so street shots at night can be noisy and lack detail.

Macro Photography

Neither camera specifies macro focusing distances, and due to small sensors and moderate max apertures, close-up shots are possible but not exceptional.

No focus stacking or advanced focus features are available.

Samsung’s optical image stabilization aids handheld macro shots better than Sony’s, which can be unstable at long zooms.

Night / Astro Photography

Both cameras perform poorly at ISO levels above 400, making astrophotography or long exposure night scenes challenging.

They lack built-in bulb modes or remote shutter options. You’ll likely get noisy images with limited detail.

Video Capabilities

Neither camera impresses on video.

Both max out at 1280 x 720 resolution (HD), with no 4K or Full HD options.

Sony’s support of MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs is better than Samsung’s basic formats.

Sony includes an external microphone port, which is rare for compacts and adds some versatility for amateur videographers.

Neither offers continuous autofocus during recording or advanced stabilization for smooth clips.

Travel Photography

Samsung’s lightweight and pocketable body make it excellent for travel, especially if you prioritize compactness and general versatility.

Sony offers more zoom reach for sightseeing but at the cost of bulk and weight, which may slow you down.

Battery life favors Sony, rated at approximately 300 shots per charge versus Samsung’s unspecified but likely shorter runtime.

Professional Work

Both cameras lack RAW capture, robust AF systems, weather sealing, and pro-level codecs or connectivity options, limiting usefulness for professional workflows.

Neither supports tethering or advanced wireless features beyond Samsung’s basic NFC.

Digging Deeper: Technical Performance, Ergonomics, and Connectivity

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither affordable superzoom has environmental protections such as weather sealing or toughened chassis. Build quality is adequate but plastic-heavy on both.

In real use, treat them as casual cameras - not for rugged professional environments.

Ergonomics and User Interface

The Sony’s control layout with manual dials and customizable buttons is a plus for enthusiasts who want exposure control without menu diving.

Samsung’s UI is simplified, aimed at casual users and beginners, with no aperture or shutter speed priority modes.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Both feature fixed lenses, so no lens swapping is possible. If changing lenses or sensor upgrades is a future concern, neither is expandable.

Sony’s optical zoom range is truly astounding - capable for distant subjects without any extra glass.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Sony’s explicit 300 shot battery rating with a rechargeable battery pack edges Samsung, whose rating is unspecified but stems from a smaller battery.

Memory cards differ slightly: Samsung uses microSD cards (MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC), which are tiny and versatile. Sony accepts full-size SD and Memory Stick PRO cards, more common in the photography world.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Samsung wins here with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy smartphone pairing and remote shooting apps, ideal for sharing images quickly.

Sony offers no wireless capabilities but adds HDMI and USB 2.0 ports for wired transfers and external viewing.

Value Evaluation: What You Get for Your Dollar

At prices of $179.99 (Samsung) and $268 (Sony) at launch, there’s a gap that hints at feature and performance differences.

Samsung is the budget-friendly compact zoom, best for casual users wanting portability and ease of use.

Sony’s premium bridge camera styling, vastly longer zoom, electronic viewfinder, and manual controls justify the higher price for enthusiasts wanting more creative flexibility.

In my testing, the Sony H400 scores higher in overall usability, zoom range, and feature set, but Samsung WB50F wins for simple portability and ease of use.

Looking across photography genres, the Sony excels notably in wildlife and telephoto needs, while Samsung is sufficient for street and travel hobbyists.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both the Samsung WB50F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 serve distinct segments of the superzoom market. So which to choose?

• Choose Samsung WB50F if:

  • You want a super-compact, lightweight camera easy to carry daily
  • You prefer simplicity over manual controls and extensive zoom
  • Your budget is tight, and you prioritize Wi-Fi connectivity for quick sharing
  • Street and travel photography at moderate zoom is your main interest
  • You don’t require RAW shooting or advanced AF features

• Choose Sony DSC-H400 if:

  • The lens reach to 1550 mm is a game-changer for distant subjects
  • You appreciate an electronic viewfinder and manual exposure control
  • You value better image stabilization on longer lens lengths
  • You shoot outdoor wildlife or landscape photos needing longer focal lengths
  • You want optional external microphone input for video recording
  • Bulk and weight are less of an issue for you

For professionals or serious enthusiasts, neither camera is ideal given sensor limitations and lack of RAW. However, they both offer entry-level superzoom experiences worthy of consideration depending on your priorities.

Summary: The Compact Zoom Rivalry in a Nutshell

• Samsung WB50F: Compact, simple, Wi-Fi enabled, moderate zoom (12x), budget-conscious, limited manual functions.
• Sony H400: Larger bridge style, massive zoom (63x), EVF included, manual modes, better suited for telephoto enthusiasts.

Whichever you pick, understanding these cameras’ trade-offs ensures you get the best fit for your style - whether sneaking urban street shots or bringing distant wildlife close.

Happy shooting!