Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Samsung WB700 versus Sigma Quattro H, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the WB700 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the WB700 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB700 was revealed 6 years before the Quattro H and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WB700 scores versus the Quattro H in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB700 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB700 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Sigma Quattro H
WB700 | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Samsung WB700
Quattro H | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | December 2010 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 614k | Sharper screen (+1006k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB700 and Sigma Quattro H
WB700 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB700 enjoys outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB700 versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WB700 compared to the Quattro H.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB700 and Quattro H is 98 and 78 respectively.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB700 and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WB700 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you extra detail because of its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older WB700 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB700 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Samsung WB700 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB700 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-12-28 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,134 |