Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB750 (13MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WB750 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe WB750 was brought out 8 years after the SD9 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the WB750 scores against the SD9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB750 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB750 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Sigma SD9
| WB750 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 107 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 130k | Crisper screen (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung WB750
| SD9 | WB750 |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB750 and Sigma SD9
| WB750 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB750 provides external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WB750 versus the SD9.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB750 and SD9 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB750 and SD9.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB750 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung WB750 will show more detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent WB750 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB750 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Samsung WB750 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung WB750 | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2011-09-01 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4096 x 3072 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $339 | $3,001 |