Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Superseded the Sigma DP2
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2x
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WB800F was launched 2 years later than the DP2s and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WB800F grades versus the DP2s with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB800F & Sigma DP2s. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma DP2s
| WB800F | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Samsung WB800F
| DP2s | WB800F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma DP2s
| WB800F | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F features exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2s has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WB800F compared to the DP2s.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and DP2s is 92 and 86 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and DP2s.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB800F due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung WB800F will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger WB800F will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB800F vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
| Samsung WB800F | Sigma DP2s | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sigma DP2s |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | True II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 280 gr (0.62 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $940 |