Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
- Later Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL8 was manufactured 7 years after the SP-590 UZ which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-PL8 matches up against the SP-590 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus SP-590 UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PL8 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 94 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-PL8
SP-590 UZ | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PL8 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 enjoys outer dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-590 UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d37/c5d37a884fa24a59ba5030a753ed03ed54059660" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and SP-590 UZ is 86 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cabe/8cabed587634cd3f5233957cc3909a1c7510fe35" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and SP-590 UZ.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-PL8 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cce54/cce54617f20513050b4d74bdd921e5a20b30b1d3" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b4df/9b4dff714db409faef9f8324e30084a55503064a" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $500 | $249 |