Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
55
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing a camera can be an exciting yet complex decision, especially when models cater to vastly different markets - like the compact Samsung WB800F and the advanced DSLR Sigma SD1 Merrill. Both models offer unique strengths, technologies, and use cases, but they target different photography styles and skill levels. With over 15 years testing and reviewing digital cameras, I’ll guide you through a detailed comparison addressing design, image quality, autofocus, usability, and more, helping you find the best option for your creative journey.

Size and Handling: Compact Versus DSLR Presence

Ergonomics matter a lot in photography, influencing how comfortable and intuitive a camera is during extended shoots. The Samsung WB800F, part of the small sensor superzoom compact category, is designed explicitly for portability and ease, while the Sigma SD1 Merrill is a mid-size DSLR built for robust use.

  • Samsung WB800F Dimensions: 111 x 65 x 22 mm; Weight: 218 g
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill Dimensions: 146 x 113 x 80 mm; Weight: 790 g

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

The WB800F fits easily in your pocket or a small bag, great for travel and spontaneous shooting. It’s lightweight enough to carry all day without fatigue, ideal if you prioritize ease-of-use and stealth. On the other hand, the SD1 Merrill’s heft and bulk mean it demands a dedicated bag, but with that comes a solid grip and the feel of a serious professional tool. The weight also helps with steadiness in hand-held shots, especially when shooting with longer lenses.

Practical takeaway: If portability and quick deployment are your priorities, the WB800F wins. For serious photo shoots demanding a full DSLR experience, the Sigma’s classic SLR body is the better match.

Design and Controls: Intuitive Layouts for Different Photographers

How cameras handle operationally is pivotal. Do you want fast tactile control with physical buttons, or would you prefer touchscreen simplicity?

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

The Samsung WB800F features a 3-inch fixed TFT touchscreen (460k dots) that’s responsive and user-friendly, especially for casual users and vloggers. However, it lacks a viewfinder and physical dials for instant manual control. The camera leans heavily on touchscreen menus and basic physical buttons, which works well if you’re comfortable with that interface, but can slow down shooting in bright conditions or action moments.

On the other hand, the Sigma SD1 Merrill boasts a traditional DSLR design with an optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 96% of the frame, a magnification of 0.64x, and well-placed manual controls. The absence of touchscreen functionality doesn’t hinder professionals accustomed to dials and buttons. Instead, it provides tactile confidence and speed. Plus, no built-in flash means you might want to invest in an external flash unit for better lighting control.

Bottom line: Samsung is ideal for on-the-go photographers and beginners enjoying touchscreen simplicity, while Sigma caters to professionals who value granular manual control and optical composing.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor Versus Foveon APS-C

Here’s where the two cameras diverge dramatically.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

  • Samsung WB800F sensor: 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS, 16 MP (approx 28.07 mm² area)
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor: APS-C Foveon X3 CMOS, 15 MP (384 mm² area)

The WB800F’s small sensor suits compact cameras but generally limits image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range. Conversely, the Sigma’s Foveon X3 sensor is unique - it captures full color information at every pixel via stacked layers, delivering sharper, highly detailed images with rich natural colors unmatched by conventional Bayer sensors. While 15 MP might seem low on paper, the effective detail rivals or exceeds sensors with higher pixel counts because of its full color capture method.

Real-world shooting confirms this: you’ll notice far cleaner images from the Sigma at base ISO 100–400, with excellent skin tone rendering for portraits and deep contrast in landscapes.

Autofocus Performance and Accuracy

Autofocus (AF) is critical when capturing decisive moments in portraits, wildlife, or sports.

Feature Samsung WB800F Sigma SD1 Merrill
AF type Contrast-detection, face detection Phase-detection DSLR autofocus
AF Points Unknown, includes face detection Multi-area, phase AF
AF Modes Single, tracking, selective Single, continuous autofocus
AF Live View No No
Eye/Animal Eye AF Face detection only No

The Samsung WB800F emphasizes ease-of-use with contrast detection AF combined with face detection for reliable portrait shots. However, contrast AF is typically slower and less accurate in moving subjects compared to phase detection. There is no continuous AF for video, limiting fast-paced tracking performance.

The Sigma SD1 Merrill implements a DSLR-grade phase detection autofocus with multi-area selection and continuous AF, making it more suitable for dynamic subjects like wildlife or sports. However, it lacks face or eye detection, which might slow portrait workflows compared to more modern systems.

Recommendation for AF: Outdoor action and wildlife photographers will appreciate Sigma’s faster accuracy. Casual shooters and portrait photographers might find Samsung’s face detection adequate for controlled environments.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

  • Samsung WB800F: Fixed 23–483 mm (21x) zoom lens, max aperture f/2.8–5.9; no interchangeable lenses
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill: Sigma SA mount, compatible with 76 lenses, including fixed primes, zooms, and specialty optics; aperture varies by lens

One of the biggest limitations for the WB800F is the non-interchangeable lens design. It provides huge versatility with a broad zoom range from wide-angle to super-telephoto on a compact body, but you cannot swap lenses for different effects or higher optical quality.

The Sigma SD1 Merrill shines in this department with a comprehensive native lens ecosystem including acclaimed primes that leverage the high resolution and unique color depth of the Foveon sensor. You can choose macro lenses, wide-angle, telephotos, and specialty lenses based on your genre and style.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

  • Samsung WB800F: No environmental sealing, plastic compact body
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill: Weather sealing present but not waterproof

Sigma’s robust build with some weather resistance gives it the reliability needed for outdoor and professional shoots, whereas the Samsung is ideal for casual indoor or good-weather conditions but is not designed for harsh environments.

Display and Viewfinder Experience

Samsung’s 3" fixed 460k TFT LCD with touchscreen enables quick menu navigation and framing through live view but suffers in bright sun and lacks an electronic or optical viewfinder. The absence of an eyepiece can make compositional accuracy tougher in strong daylight.

Conversely, Sigma’s 3" fixed 460k non-touch LCD complements an optical pentaprism viewfinder lending precise manual focus capability and composition in all lighting conditions.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Battery and Storage Considerations

Both cameras use a single memory card slot:

  • Samsung WB800F: SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, battery life not specified
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill: Compact Flash (CF) Type I with UDMA support; battery life info also unspecified

For heavy shooting sessions, CF cards often offer faster write speeds, ideal for raw files. Sigma’s DSLR also uses larger batteries that typically endure longer shooting times than compacts, supporting professionals on longer assignments.

Video Capabilities

If video is on your radar, the Samsung outshines the Sigma by offering:

  • Samsung WB800F: Full HD 1080p at 30fps, H.264 codec, optical image stabilization, and a built-in mic (no external microphone port)
  • Sigma SD1 Merrill: No video recording capabilities

The Samsung can serve well as a lightweight hybrid camera for casual video blogging or family videos. The Sigma is strictly photography-focused.

Real-World Use Across Photography Genres

Let’s assess how these cameras serve across popular photography disciplines.

Photography Type Samsung WB800F Strengths Sigma SD1 Merrill Strengths
Portrait Face detection AF, good skin tones on JPEG, easy use Superior color depth, superb detail, lens choice
Landscape Wide zoom coverage to capture distant scenes High dynamic range, raw support, weather sealing
Wildlife Long zoom lens built-in, contrast detection AF Fast phase AF with telephoto lenses
Sports Limited fast frame rates and tracking Better continuous AF, but modest frame rates
Street Compact and discreet design Larger body, slower AF
Macro Limited due to fixed lens Excellent with macro lenses, manual focus
Night/Astro Small sensor struggles in low light APS-C sensor with Foveon tech excels in detail
Video HD recording available No video mode
Travel Lightweight, pocketable Heavier, but versatile lens options
Professional Work Entry-level JPEG only workflow Full RAW support and professional-grade files

Image Quality Deep Dive: RAW Versus JPEG

The Sigma SD1 Merrill shoots 15 MP RAW files, leveraging the Foveon sensor's rich color data, supporting extensive post-processing. The WB800F, however, does not support RAW capture, only JPEG, which limits dynamic range and editing flexibility.

If you are serious about post-processing or professional work, RAW support is a must, giving Sigma a big advantage. The WB800F’s JPEG engine is decent but cannot compete with the flexibility and fidelity of RAW files.

Price-to-Performance and Final Verdict

Aspect Samsung WB800F Sigma SD1 Merrill
Launch Price $299.99 $2,338.70
Target User Casual, beginner, travel Professional, enthusiast
Value Proposition Portability, zoom versatility Image quality, lens flexibility
Recommended For Walk-around, family photos Studio, landscape, portraits

And by discipline:

Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Choose the Samsung WB800F if:

  • You want a lightweight, pocketable camera with a massive zoom range.
  • You value touchscreen ease and video capabilities.
  • You mostly shoot JPEGs and casual photos for social media or family.
  • You appreciate quick setup without fussing over interchangeable lenses.

Choose the Sigma SD1 Merrill if:

  • Your priority is professional-level image quality with superior color and detail.
  • You want full manual controls and RAW capture flexibility.
  • You need a rugged build and lens ecosystem for diverse photographic genres.
  • You shoot portraits, landscapes, or studio photography requiring precise control.

Getting Started and Testing Before Buying

I highly recommend getting hands-on experience with these cameras if possible. Visit a retailer or rental service to try them under conditions similar to your photography style. Pay attention to:

  • How the camera feels in your hands over extended shooting
  • Interface responsiveness and menu intuitiveness
  • Autofocus speed and reliability with your preferred subjects
  • Image outputs on your computer to judge sharpness and color reproduction

Exploring compatible lenses (for the Sigma) or accessories like external flashes can also influence your decision and enrich your creative options.

Final Thoughts

The Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD1 Merrill serve distinctly different photographers. One emphasizes compact convenience and zoom versatility, the other prioritizes advanced sensor technology and professional workflows. Your shooting habits, budget, and creative goals should drive your choice.

For newcomers excited to explore photography with minimal barriers, the Samsung WB800F is a compelling “all-in-one” tool at an accessible price. For seasoned photographers looking to maximize image fidelity and control, the Sigma SD1 Merrill remains a fascinating, if niche, contender that can deliver exquisite results.

Whichever path you take, remember that mastering your camera, from technical settings to composition, will be the true key to stunning imagery.

Good luck, and happy shooting!

For more on these cameras and to see full image galleries, check out detailed hands-on reviews and sample galleries available on trusted photo review sites.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung WB800FSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB800F Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-07 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 218 gr (0.48 pounds) 790 gr (1.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $2,339