Clicky

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Samsung WB800F front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the WB800F (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WB800F was revealed 10 months later than the SD1 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the WB800F scores vs the SD1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB800F SD1 Merrill 
LaunchedJanuary 2013April 2012More recent by 10 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB800F

 SD1 Merrill WB800F 

Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB800F SD1 Merrill 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F enjoys exterior measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Examine the Samsung WB800F versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WB800F versus the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and SD1 Merrill is 92 and 57 respectively.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and SD1 Merrill.

Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB800F with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WB800F should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB800F Portrait photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography features
44
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
has manual focus
megapixel count good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung WB800F Street photography info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography info
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
57
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB800F Sports photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography highlights
53
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
61
megapixel count good (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
Travel photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
69
lighter than competition (218g)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
environment proof
megapixel count good (15MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
50
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
63
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging features
35
rather wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (218g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic support
9
can't shoot video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB800F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB800F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung WB800FSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB800F Sigma SD1 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-07 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 218 gr (0.48 pounds) 790 gr (1.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $2,339