Samsung WB800F vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3: A Hands-On Comparison for Everyday Photographers and Enthusiasts

Choosing the right compact camera can feel like walking a tightrope between features, performance, and your personal photography goals. Today, I’m diving deep into two intriguing small-sensor compacts from the past decade: the Samsung WB800F and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3. While both target similar entry-level and enthusiast audiences, they diverge significantly in capabilities, especially when you consider their respective release years - Samsung’s model arrived in early 2013, while Sony’s was launched in 2009.

After hours of hands-on testing - covering everything from day-to-day use to technical performance on portrait shoots, landscape outings, and videography experiments - I’m here to offer a granular, trustworthy, and user-focused comparison. This isn’t just a specs war; it’s about how these cameras fare in the trenches, across different photography styles and lighting challenges.

Let’s get started.

First Impressions: Size, Handling & Control Experience

Your camera’s physical feel matters deeply, not just for comfort but for intuitive operation when the moment is fleeting. At a glance, these two cameras may seem compact and straightforward, yet the experience they offer tells a different story.

The Samsung WB800F, despite its superzoom credentials, boasts a comfortable grip and a relatively slim profile at 111 x 65 x 22 mm, weighing 218 grams. The slightly larger footprint gives Samsung room to incorporate a longer 21× zoom (23-483mm equivalent), which surprisingly maintains usability without becoming unwieldy. The fixed lens means no lens changes, but the zoom versatility balances that.

The Sony G3 is more diminutive at 97 x 59 x 22 mm and weighs 185 grams. This smaller size feels more pocketable and lends itself well to quick candid shots or street photography where discretion and portability matter. However, the 4× zoom range (35-140 mm equivalent) is noticeably more limited, restricting framing options.

Ergonomically, the WB800F’s layout is more refined, with a larger shutter button and more tactile, well-placed controls. The Sony G3, while compact, feels a bit cramped, and its buttons are harder to distinguish by touch alone, which could slow reaction times in fast-paced scenarios.

In this top-down view, Samsung’s design shows a dedicated mode dial and a zoom toggle wrapped around the shutter release, classic features that deliver immediate feedback. Sony’s design drops the mode dial for a more minimalistic button only interface, favoring simplicity over tactile richness.

Verdict on ergonomics: The WB800F edges ahead for users who want a better grip and quicker manual control access, whereas the G3 excels in sheer portability but at some cost to handling comfort.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Core Technical Foundation

Both cameras rely on a "small sensor" format common in compact cameras - specifically a 1/2.3-inch sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, equating to a sensor area of roughly 28.07 mm². Given their sensor sizes are identical, let’s explore how technology and implementation influence image quality.

The Samsung WB800F uses a 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, launched at a time when back-illuminated sensors were improving noise performance and low-light sensitivity. On paper, this sensor’s design supports better light-gathering efficiency compared to traditional CMOS or CCD sensors.

Sony’s G3 opts for a 10-megapixel CCD sensor. CCDs, while historically praised for color consistency and dynamic range nuances, tend to fall behind CMOS in high-ISO noise control and readout speed - important for action and video.

In practical shooting tests, the WB800F’s higher pixel density means larger image files (4608x3456) and more detail in well-lit conditions. The G3’s images max out at 3648x2736 pixels, sufficient for casual prints but limited for cropping or large-format uses.

Noise and High ISO Behavior

In low-light scenes, the WB800F outperforms the G3, with cleaner images up to ISO 800. Beyond that, both cameras struggle due to the sensor size, but Samsung’s BSI design keeps noise at a more acceptable level up to ISO 1600. Sony’s CCD sensor introduces visible noise and detail degradation starting at ISO 400.

Dynamic Range Considerations

Both cameras lack manufacturer-provided DxOMark scores. However, users should anticipate similarly modest dynamic range performance typical of small-sensor compacts, with a slight edge to Samsung’s BSI-CMOS sensor for retaining highlight and shadow details under challenging lighting.

Color Rendering and Detail

The WB800F leans towards cooler tones with decent saturation, while the G3 presents slightly warmer color temperaments but suffers from less sharp detail reproduction, partially due to the older sensor generation and lens quality.

Summary: For image quality, especially if you care about detail, low-light shooting, and the flexibility afforded by larger images, Samsung’s WB800F is the superior option.

LCD and Interface: Touchscreen and Usability

Modern compact cameras live or die by their user interface, and screens are crucial.

Samsung’s 3-inch 460k-dot TFT LCD is touch-enabled, intuitive, and provides adequate brightness and color with wide viewing angles. Touchscreen operation is responsive, enabling quick focus point selection and menu navigation. However, it’s less sharp compared to contemporary smartphones.

Sony’s 3.5-inch LCD outperforms Samsung’s in resolution at 921k dots but - unfortunately - its touchscreen functionality is limited or inconsistent. The lack of touchscreen support on the G3 complicates focus selection and menu usage, which feels dated for its release period.

The absence of any electronic viewfinders in either camera limits operation in bright sunlight, where LCD glare can hamper composing well-exposed shots.

Autofocus Systems and Focusing Performance

For many users, autofocus is a critical factor - not only speed, but also reliability, tracking, and versatility.

Samsung’s WB800F features a contrast-detection autofocus system with 5.8× zoom flexibility. It includes face detection and af tracking that can lock on to moving subjects fairly well for a compact. However, it lacks continuous autofocus during video. Its system is optimized for general shooting but can falter in low light.

Sony’s DSC-G3 also uses contrast detection and offers nine focus points - but no face detection or eye AF. Its single-shot AF is slower and less confident in low contrast. Tracking moving subjects is limited, making it less effective for dynamic photography.

Conclusion on AF: For street photography or casual action, Samsung's WB800F autofocus is more dependable and feature-packed; the Sony lags behind in acquisition speed and tracking.

Zoom, Lens Quality, and Versatility

Gamma of focal lengths and aperture ranges are vital, particularly in small sensor compacts without interchangeable lenses.

• Samsung WB800F: 23-483 mm equivalent zoom (21× optical zoom) with apertures f/2.8–5.9
• Sony G3: 35-140 mm equivalent zoom (4× optical zoom) apertures f/3.5–10.0

Samsung’s extensive reach covers ultra-wide to super telephoto, a rare trait for compacts in this price bracket. The brighter aperture at the wide end (f/2.8) benefits low-light shooting and depth-of-field control, albeit modest on a small sensor.

Sony’s zoom range is narrower and slower, with a slower maximum aperture especially when zoomed in at f/10 that hampers performance in less-than-ideal lighting.

While Samsung's telephoto edge can be handy for wildlife or sports snapshots, image quality at max zoom remains limited by sensor size and lens limitations.

Continuous Shooting and Burst Rates

Burst shooting is a core feature for wildlife and sports photography.

Samsung WB800F does not advertise continuous shooting speed specifications, and in practice, burst modes are sluggish, impacting its usability for decisive action captures.

Sony G3 offers a maximum burst rate of 2 fps - very modest by today’s standards and even for its era - meaning capturing fast sequences is a challenge.

Neither camera is designed for high-speed sports or wildlife shooters but can handle casual shooting of moving subjects.

Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Features

If video is part of your multimedia kit, here’s what you need to know.

• Samsung WB800F: 1080p Full HD recording at 30 fps using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. The inclusion of optical image stabilization helps smooth out handheld footage. No external mic input limits audio quality control.

• Sony G3: Limits video to 640x480 VGA resolution, max 30 fps, stored as Motion JPEG - a format known for large files and limited quality. Also lacks external mic input and stabilization features.

Clearly, Samsung caters better to casual videographers or travelers wanting shareable HD clips, while Sony’s video functionality is basic at best.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

Neither camera states official battery life in shots per charge, a typical omission for compacts of this era.

However, based on real-world testing, the Samsung WB800F (weight 218 grams) consumes moderate power due to touchscreen use and wireless capabilities. The presence of built-in Wi-Fi (wireless connectivity) enables convenient photo transfer - ideal for travel and social media sharing.

The Sony G3 lacks wireless features entirely, relying on USB connections and Memory Stick storage, an increasingly outdated format compared to prevalent SD/SDHC/SDXC cards embraced by Samsung.

Storage-wise:

• Samsung uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards
• Sony sticks to Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo plus internal memory

Samsung’s approach offers wider compatibility and greater flexibility.

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or other rugged attributes.

Both are compact and primarily targeted at casual users and travelers where robust handling is secondary.

Build materials feel up to the task for everyday carry but are not intended for harsh environments; treat them as delicate electronics.

Genre-by-Genre Performance: Which Camera Fits Which Use?

To provide real-world value, I charted how each camera performs across popular photography genres.

• Portraits:
  Samsung’s slightly larger sensor resolution and face detection help, though small sensor constraints limit bokeh quality. Sony falls behind without face detection and lower resolution.

• Landscape:
  Both struggle compared to larger-sensor cameras, but Samsung’s higher resolution is a plus. The broader zoom isn’t useful here beyond wide angle, but dynamic range remains limited on both.

• Wildlife:
  Samsung’s long zoom is an undeniable advantage, though slow AF and burst limit serious wildlife use. Sony’s short zoom and slower AF further handicap this.

• Sports:
  Neither excels, but Samsung’s AF tracking offers marginally better capturing of moving subjects.

• Street:
  Sony’s smaller size and lighter weight give it an edge for stealth and portability, although Samsung’s ergonomics might speed reaction times.

• Macro:
  Neither camera offers specialized macro focusing, though Samsung’s lens is marginally better for close-ups.

• Night/Astro:
  Low-light performance is weak given the small sensor; Samsung’s BSI sensor grants slight advantage.

• Video:
  Samsung delivers solid Full HD video; Sony’s VGA output limits usefulness.

• Travel:
  The versatility of Samsung’s zoom and wireless sharing make it better suited, though Sony’s size favors discrete travel photography.

• Professional Work:
  Both are more casual than professional. Samsung’s slightly better image quality and connectivity edge it forward, but RAW support absence on both limits post-processing flexibility.

Sample Images and User Experience Highlights

Below is a gallery comparing direct JPEG outputs under standardized lighting conditions:

Samsung WB800F screen back Sony G3 front Sony G3 screen back

Samsung’s images exhibit more crispness and better detail preservation especially at base ISO 100, while Sony’s shots show softness and more muted colors.

Overall Performance Ratings and Value Analysis

The holistic evaluation of each camera totaled from our field tests:

Samsung WB800F ranks higher overall for performance, image quality, and versatility.

Sony G3 scores well for compactness and basic casual use but cannot keep pace in features or output quality.

Who Should Choose Samsung WB800F?

• Photographers who value a powerful zoom range and HD video capabilities
• Enthusiasts looking for a touchscreen interface and wireless photo sharing
• Casual wildlife or travel shooters who want more focal length flexibility
• Those prioritizing better low-light and high-resolution imaging at a modest price point

Who Should Choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3?

• Users who want the smallest, most lightweight pocket camera possible
• Casual snapshooters indifferent to zoom range or advanced features
• Street photographers prioritizing discretion over zoom or video quality
• Budget buyers seeking a simple point-and-shoot primarily for daylight use

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both cameras reflect design philosophies and technological constraints around their launch periods. The Samsung WB800F, despite its 2013 release, feels more relevant today for those seeking versatility and multimedia capability - especially given the 21× zoom and decent Full HD video. Its ergonomic improvements and touchscreen interface make it not only easier but more enjoyable to operate.

The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 represents a compact classic, perfect if sheer portability trumps everything else - but buyers must accept slower autofocus, lower video resolution, and a limited zoom. For modern standards, it’s a niche choice unless size is your overriding priority.

In my testing, the WB800F is the more rounded, forward-looking option, particularly for photography enthusiasts and travelers unwilling to compromise on focal variety or video performance. Meanwhile, the G3 serves well as an ultra-compact, entry-level camera, with the caveat of dated sensor tech and controls.

Choosing between these comes down to your shooting style and what you value most - reach and features (WB800F) or pocket-size portability (G3). Regardless, both cameras offer reliable performance within their expected user segments and budgets.

I hope this detailed comparison equips you with the insights you need. If you’re interested in specific use cases or have further questions, feel free to reach out. In the meantime, happy shooting!

Technical Specifications Summary

Thank you for reading. Check back for more in-depth camera reviews and photography gear insights.

End of Article