Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced October 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100 IV
- New Model is Sony RX100 VI
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the RX100 V (20MP) is pretty well matched but the WB800F (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB800F was introduced 4 years before the RX100 V and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the WB800F matches up vs the RX100 V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony RX100 V
WB800F | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Samsung WB800F
RX100 V | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 45 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 V
WB800F | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB800F features external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony RX100 V has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB800F and Sony RX100 V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB800F compared to the RX100 V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and RX100 V is 92 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and RX100 V.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB800F using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX100 V will give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older WB800F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-10-06 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 299g (0.66 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $300 | $998 |