Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e32d/7e32ded8c29091f177b6d094955d90e439bda6e0" alt="Sony SLT-A65 front Sony SLT-A65 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Announced November 2011
- Successor is Sony A68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A65 (24MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WB800F was manufactured 14 months after the A65 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WB800F grades vs the A65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB800F and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB800F Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A65
WB800F | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2011 | More modern by 14 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Samsung WB800F
A65 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A65
WB800F | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the WB800F and the A65.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68ec/e68ec6bd2ae2c6600bb7ff151e10ffb3b035f7d1" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB800F and A65 is 92 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbd0e/cbd0e3b855616362f6dcf22ce322026a602aafba" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB800F and A65.
Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB800F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sony A65 will render more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern WB800F provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb43/1cb4354ce6270b2e4b35a21f0580d1018775547a" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83889/838895c02205201144118162d9ee3f077972db82" alt="Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A65 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB800F | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2011-11-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 622g (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $700 |