Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
- Replaced the Pentax K-30
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-50 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-50 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was revealed 2 years later than the K-50 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the K-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-50
E-M1 II | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | November 2013 | More recent by 35 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-50 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-50
E-M1 II | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax K-50 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the K-50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and K-50 is 68 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-50.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-50 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 650 gr (1.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 410 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $610 |