Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


64 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2006
- Previous Model is Konica Minolta 5D
- Replacement is Sony A550

Samsung WB850F vs Sony Alpha A100: An In-Depth Comparative Analysis for Photography Enthusiasts
Selecting a camera that best suits your photography requirements demands more than a checklist glance at specs. It requires contextualizing feature sets and performance nuances within real-world applications. This detailed comparative review examines two distinctly different systems released in overlapping eras - the Samsung WB850F, a small sensor compact superzoom, and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A100, an entry-level APS-C DSLR. Both cameras occupy unique niche positions, and through rigorous hands-on testing and technical scrutiny, I provide balanced insights aimed to inform enthusiasts and semi-professionals considering legacy or budget systems.
Understanding the Camera Types and Design Philosophies
Before delving into technicalities and performance, it is essential to frame these cameras within their design intentions and target users. The Samsung WB850F, launched in 2012, emphasizes high-zoom versatility in a compact form factor, appealing to casual users seeking extensive focal reach without interchangeable lenses. Conversely, the Sony A100, introduced in 2006, is a traditional DSLR aimed at entry-level photographers desiring manual control, optical viewfinding, and the flexibility of the Sony/Minolta Alpha lens ecosystem.
Ergonomics and Physical Handling: Compact vs DSLR
Ergonomics profoundly influence usability - an often-underappreciated factor outside physical handling. The Samsung WB850F boasts a petite footprint at 109x62x25 mm and weighs a mere 250 g. Its compactness favors pocketability but compromises extensive control surfaces typical of DSLRs. The Sony A100, by contrast, is noticeably larger and heavier (133x95x71 mm; 638 g), typical for DSLRs, designed for stable handholding with larger grip contours and more ergonomic button placement.
From a practical viewpoint, the Samsung’s slim design excels in casual shooting scenarios, travel, and street photography requiring discretion and portability. Meanwhile, the A100’s heft and grip make it conducive for prolonged use, with added physical stability that benefits telephoto and macro applications.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Considerations
Image quality primary hinges on sensor attributes. The Samsung WB850F employs a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor with 16 MP resolution, whereas the Sony A100 integrates a physically larger APS-C CCD sensor (23.6x15.8 mm) with 10 MP.
Impact of Sensor Size and Type
- Sensor Size: The A100's APS-C sensor area (approximately 373 mm²) is over 13 times larger than the WB850F's 28 mm² sensor. This size discrepancy directly influences dynamic range, noise performance, and depth of field control.
- Sensor Type: The WB850F's backside-illuminated CMOS design increases light gathering efficiency for a small sensor. The A100’s CCD technology was industry standard in its time but generally exhibits higher noise and lower dynamic range compared to contemporary CMOS sensors.
- Resolution: Though the WB850F offers higher pixel count, the smaller sensor size leads to smaller photosites, which typically results in increased noise and less latitude in post-processing compared to the A100’s larger pixels, albeit at lower megapixels.
Real-World Image Quality
Hands-on testing confirms the A100’s APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality in low-light and high dynamic range scenes compared to the WB850F. For outdoor landscapes and portraits, the Sony’s sensor allows for richer tonality and better highlight preservation. However, the Samsung’s sensor benefits from modern processing, improving JPEG output sharpness and color saturation in well-lit scenarios but struggles above ISO 400, showing noise artifacts.
Lens Versatility and Optical Performance
Samsung WB850F: Fixed Superzoom Lens
The WB850F offers a fixed 23-483 mm (35mm equivalent) lens with 21x optical zoom, and an aperture range of f/2.8-5.9. Its lens versatility excels in situations requiring focal length flexibility without equipment changes.
- Macro Focus Distance: 5 cm, enabling decent close-up capabilities in a compact body.
- Image Stabilization: Optical IS supports handheld shooting at long telephoto ranges.
- Limitations: The small sensor combined with a modest aperture at telephoto limits depth of field control and low-light performance.
Sony A100: Interchangeable Lens Ecosystem
The A100 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with a large selection of 143 lenses, from primes to professional-grade telephotos.
- System Flexibility: Enables use of fast prime lenses for shallow depth of field and specialized optics for macro, landscape, and portraiture.
- Focus Multiplier: 1.5x crop factor affects the effective focal length, beneficial for telephoto reach.
- Image Stabilization: Sensor-based IS in the A100 relies on lens support; some lenses have built-in stabilization.
The diversity and quality of available glass give the A100 a significant advantage in controlled image creation for enthusiasts and professionals willing to invest in glass.
Autofocus Systems and Performance
The autofocus system is critical, especially for fast action or low-light scenarios.
Feature | Samsung WB850F | Sony A100 |
---|---|---|
AF System Type | Contrast Detection AF with Face Detection | Phase Detection AF with 9 focus points |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
Tracking AF | Basic | Not available |
Practical Implications
- Samsung WB850F: Benefit from face detection for casual portraits and general scenes but limited continuous AF restricts action photography. The contrast-detection AF may exhibit slower acquisition in dim environments.
- Sony A100: Phase detection offers faster locking speed and better performance for moving subjects but lacks face or eye detection technologies available in modern models.
In wildlife or sports, the A100’s 3 fps burst rate and phase detection provide more reliable tracking than the WB850F’s 10 fps continuous shooting but limited AF adaptability.
Shutter Speed Range and Frame Rate
Shutter speed capability and frame rate influence the camera’s suitability for different genres.
Specification | Samsung WB850F | Sony A100 |
---|---|---|
Min Shutter Speed | 8 s | 30 s |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 s | 1/4000 s |
Burst Mode Speed | 10 fps | 3 fps |
Analysis
- The WB850F impressively offers a 10 fps burst mode, useful for capturing fast slices of action - though it is more suited for small sensor JPEG captures that may compromise resolution under burst.
- The A100’s longer max shutter speed and higher top shutter speed allow more flexibility in long exposures and freezing fast action.
- A limitation in both models is the lack of modern high-frame-rate video or high-speed continuous shooting features found in newer cameras.
Viewfinder and Live View Experience
- Samsung WB850F: No viewfinder; relies solely on a fixed 3-inch AMOLED rear screen with 614k resolution for composing images.
- Sony A100: Optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.55x magnification provides traditional DSLR composition experience.
Screen and Interface
- WB850F’s AMOLED screen offers better brightness, contrast, and color reproduction than the A100’s lower resolution 2.5-inch LCD.
- The A100 provides a more tactile, button-heavy interface with dedicated dials for exposure control, favored by manual shooters.
- WB850F lacks touchscreen or tilting mechanisms but includes GPS for geo-tagging.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance
Both cameras include image stabilization.
- WB850F: Optical Image Stabilization integrated with the lens to compensate handheld shake, benefits zoom ranges.
- A100: Sensor-based stabilization relies on compatible lenses, which were in limited supply; not natively effective with all lenses.
Low-light performance is constrained by sensor size/type:
- The Sony A100’s larger sensor produces cleaner images up to ISO 400–800, usable for nighttime, indoor, and low-light portraiture, though noise becomes visible beyond ISO 800.
- The WB850F, although employing BSI-CMOS tech, shows more noise above ISO 400, limiting usability in dim conditions.
Video Capability: A Clear Divide
The Samsung WB850F provides Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps in MPEG-4/H.264 formats, with additional HD and slow-motion modes.
- No external microphone input; inbuilt microphone quality is typical for a compact camera.
- Basic video controls and lack of advanced stabilization features.
The Sony A100 offers no video recording capabilities, reflecting DSLR standards of its era before video integration became mainstream.
For videographers and hybrid shooters, the WB850F is a specialized choice.
Storage and Connectivity Options
- Samsung WB850F: Uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with one slot. Includes built-in GPS for geotagging, and HDMI output (mini connector). USB 2.0 ensures standard tethering.
- Sony A100: Stores images on CompactFlash cards (Type I or II). No wireless connectivity or GPS. HDMI and video out ports absent.
The WB850F’s more comprehensive connectivity suits travel and casual users who want easy sharing and organization.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Battery Life
Neither camera claims weatherproofing or rugged environmental sealing. The WB850F’s plastic build is lightweight but less robust. The A100’s DSLR body offers more durability but remains unsealed.
- Battery: WB850F uses proprietary SLB-10A battery; Sony A100 uses NP-FM55H.
- Both provide reasonable longevity but no detailed standardized CIPA ratings available.
Practical Applications: Photography Genres Assessed
Photography Genre | Samsung WB850F | Sony A100 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good face detection; limited depth control | Excellent with lens choice; better skin tone rendering with APS-C sensor |
Landscape | Adequate; limited dynamic range | Superior due to sensor size and RAW support |
Wildlife | Long zoom; slower AF; less reliable | Better tracking AF; extensive telephoto lenses available |
Sports | High burst rate, basic AF | Slower fps but faster AF system; limited tracking |
Street | Discreet, lightweight | Bulkier, less discreet |
Macro | Close focusing at 5 cm | Excellent with dedicated macro lenses |
Night/Astro | Limited by sensor noise | Better ISO performance; longer exposure capability |
Video | Full HD video | None |
Travel | Compact, GPS, zoom versatility | Bulky; better image quality but less portable |
Professional Work | Limited RAW support, fewer controls | RAW support, stable workflow integration |
Image Processing and File Formats
The Samsung WB850F outputs only JPEG format images, lacking RAW capture support, which restricts post-processing flexibility, especially for enthusiasts and professionals who require dynamic parameter manipulation.
The Sony A100 supports RAW (ARW format), enhancing professional workflow compatibility with Adobe Lightroom, Capture One, and other image processing pipelines.
Price-To-Performance Ratio and Market Positioning
At original retail, the Samsung WB850F sat at approximately $600, whereas the Sony A100 priced near $1000 body-only, reflecting DSLR advantages.
- Entry level compact superzoom vs entry level DSLR distinction clarifies target demographics.
- For enthusiasts prioritizing image quality and system expandability rather than zoom range or video, used A100 units often represent more value despite age.
- For casual shooters desiring all-in-one convenience, superzoom portability, and video, the WB850F fulfills a niche.
The above shows the balanced overall capabilities; the Sony A100’s imaging strengths counterweight the Samsung’s feature-rich compact design.
Specialized Photo Genre Scores and Suitability Matrix
- The Sony A100 excels in landscape, portrait, and macro disciplines where sensor quality, lens variety, and RAW are paramount.
- The Samsung WB850F is favored for travel, street, video, and wildlife (due to zoom) under constrained lighting and action conditions.
Recommendations and Final Verdicts
Who Should Consider the Samsung WB850F?
- Enthusiasts requiring extensive zoom range in a pocketable form.
- Budget travelers prioritizing GPS, video capture, and image stabilization within a compact.
- Users with minimal post-processing intentions valuing JPEG output fidelity.
- Those needing a simple interface and automatic assist features like face detection.
Who Should Choose the Sony A100?
- Photography hobbyists desiring system expandability via lenses.
- Users focused on image quality, including shooting RAW and demanding dynamic ranges.
- Portrait, landscape, macro photographers wanting better control and image fidelity.
- Individuals comfortable managing a larger DSLR body and more involved workflows.
Conclusion: Aligning Capabilities with User Priorities
Both the Samsung WB850F and Sony A100 are thoughtfully engineered within their categories but serve markedly different photographers.
- The WB850F emphasizes versatility, compact form, and multimedia versatility suitable for point-and-shoot needs with some advanced features.
- The A100 delivers superior image quality, manual control, and system extensibility grounded in fundamental DSLR principles.
Extensive field testing reveals that none of these cameras competes directly in all domains; selecting one demands candid evaluation of personal priorities - be it portability, image quality, lens ecosystem, or video functionality. Consult this analysis alongside test shots to ensure your next acquisition aligns precisely with your photographic ambitions and practical usage scenarios.
Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 Specifications
Samsung WB850F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB850F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2006-07-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | AMOLED display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) | 638 grams (1.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 61 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 476 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-FM55H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $1,000 |