Clicky

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Samsung WB850F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 front
Portability
64
Imaging
48
Features
38
Overall
44

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 Key Specs

Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2012
Sony A100
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
  • Introduced July 2006
  • Previous Model is Konica Minolta 5D
  • Replacement is Sony A550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB850F vs Sony Alpha A100: An In-Depth Comparative Analysis for Photography Enthusiasts

Selecting a camera that best suits your photography requirements demands more than a checklist glance at specs. It requires contextualizing feature sets and performance nuances within real-world applications. This detailed comparative review examines two distinctly different systems released in overlapping eras - the Samsung WB850F, a small sensor compact superzoom, and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A100, an entry-level APS-C DSLR. Both cameras occupy unique niche positions, and through rigorous hands-on testing and technical scrutiny, I provide balanced insights aimed to inform enthusiasts and semi-professionals considering legacy or budget systems.

Understanding the Camera Types and Design Philosophies

Before delving into technicalities and performance, it is essential to frame these cameras within their design intentions and target users. The Samsung WB850F, launched in 2012, emphasizes high-zoom versatility in a compact form factor, appealing to casual users seeking extensive focal reach without interchangeable lenses. Conversely, the Sony A100, introduced in 2006, is a traditional DSLR aimed at entry-level photographers desiring manual control, optical viewfinding, and the flexibility of the Sony/Minolta Alpha lens ecosystem.

Ergonomics and Physical Handling: Compact vs DSLR

Ergonomics profoundly influence usability - an often-underappreciated factor outside physical handling. The Samsung WB850F boasts a petite footprint at 109x62x25 mm and weighs a mere 250 g. Its compactness favors pocketability but compromises extensive control surfaces typical of DSLRs. The Sony A100, by contrast, is noticeably larger and heavier (133x95x71 mm; 638 g), typical for DSLRs, designed for stable handholding with larger grip contours and more ergonomic button placement.

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 size comparison

From a practical viewpoint, the Samsung’s slim design excels in casual shooting scenarios, travel, and street photography requiring discretion and portability. Meanwhile, the A100’s heft and grip make it conducive for prolonged use, with added physical stability that benefits telephoto and macro applications.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Considerations

Image quality primary hinges on sensor attributes. The Samsung WB850F employs a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor with 16 MP resolution, whereas the Sony A100 integrates a physically larger APS-C CCD sensor (23.6x15.8 mm) with 10 MP.

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 sensor size comparison

Impact of Sensor Size and Type

  • Sensor Size: The A100's APS-C sensor area (approximately 373 mm²) is over 13 times larger than the WB850F's 28 mm² sensor. This size discrepancy directly influences dynamic range, noise performance, and depth of field control.
  • Sensor Type: The WB850F's backside-illuminated CMOS design increases light gathering efficiency for a small sensor. The A100’s CCD technology was industry standard in its time but generally exhibits higher noise and lower dynamic range compared to contemporary CMOS sensors.
  • Resolution: Though the WB850F offers higher pixel count, the smaller sensor size leads to smaller photosites, which typically results in increased noise and less latitude in post-processing compared to the A100’s larger pixels, albeit at lower megapixels.

Real-World Image Quality

Hands-on testing confirms the A100’s APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality in low-light and high dynamic range scenes compared to the WB850F. For outdoor landscapes and portraits, the Sony’s sensor allows for richer tonality and better highlight preservation. However, the Samsung’s sensor benefits from modern processing, improving JPEG output sharpness and color saturation in well-lit scenarios but struggles above ISO 400, showing noise artifacts.

Lens Versatility and Optical Performance

Samsung WB850F: Fixed Superzoom Lens

The WB850F offers a fixed 23-483 mm (35mm equivalent) lens with 21x optical zoom, and an aperture range of f/2.8-5.9. Its lens versatility excels in situations requiring focal length flexibility without equipment changes.

  • Macro Focus Distance: 5 cm, enabling decent close-up capabilities in a compact body.
  • Image Stabilization: Optical IS supports handheld shooting at long telephoto ranges.
  • Limitations: The small sensor combined with a modest aperture at telephoto limits depth of field control and low-light performance.

Sony A100: Interchangeable Lens Ecosystem

The A100 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with a large selection of 143 lenses, from primes to professional-grade telephotos.

  • System Flexibility: Enables use of fast prime lenses for shallow depth of field and specialized optics for macro, landscape, and portraiture.
  • Focus Multiplier: 1.5x crop factor affects the effective focal length, beneficial for telephoto reach.
  • Image Stabilization: Sensor-based IS in the A100 relies on lens support; some lenses have built-in stabilization.

The diversity and quality of available glass give the A100 a significant advantage in controlled image creation for enthusiasts and professionals willing to invest in glass.

Autofocus Systems and Performance

The autofocus system is critical, especially for fast action or low-light scenarios.

Feature Samsung WB850F Sony A100
AF System Type Contrast Detection AF with Face Detection Phase Detection AF with 9 focus points
Continuous AF No Yes
Face Detection Yes No
Tracking AF Basic Not available

Practical Implications

  • Samsung WB850F: Benefit from face detection for casual portraits and general scenes but limited continuous AF restricts action photography. The contrast-detection AF may exhibit slower acquisition in dim environments.
  • Sony A100: Phase detection offers faster locking speed and better performance for moving subjects but lacks face or eye detection technologies available in modern models.

In wildlife or sports, the A100’s 3 fps burst rate and phase detection provide more reliable tracking than the WB850F’s 10 fps continuous shooting but limited AF adaptability.

Shutter Speed Range and Frame Rate

Shutter speed capability and frame rate influence the camera’s suitability for different genres.

Specification Samsung WB850F Sony A100
Min Shutter Speed 8 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/4000 s
Burst Mode Speed 10 fps 3 fps

Analysis

  • The WB850F impressively offers a 10 fps burst mode, useful for capturing fast slices of action - though it is more suited for small sensor JPEG captures that may compromise resolution under burst.
  • The A100’s longer max shutter speed and higher top shutter speed allow more flexibility in long exposures and freezing fast action.
  • A limitation in both models is the lack of modern high-frame-rate video or high-speed continuous shooting features found in newer cameras.

Viewfinder and Live View Experience

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 top view buttons comparison

  • Samsung WB850F: No viewfinder; relies solely on a fixed 3-inch AMOLED rear screen with 614k resolution for composing images.
  • Sony A100: Optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.55x magnification provides traditional DSLR composition experience.

Screen and Interface

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • WB850F’s AMOLED screen offers better brightness, contrast, and color reproduction than the A100’s lower resolution 2.5-inch LCD.
  • The A100 provides a more tactile, button-heavy interface with dedicated dials for exposure control, favored by manual shooters.
  • WB850F lacks touchscreen or tilting mechanisms but includes GPS for geo-tagging.

Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance

Both cameras include image stabilization.

  • WB850F: Optical Image Stabilization integrated with the lens to compensate handheld shake, benefits zoom ranges.
  • A100: Sensor-based stabilization relies on compatible lenses, which were in limited supply; not natively effective with all lenses.

Low-light performance is constrained by sensor size/type:

  • The Sony A100’s larger sensor produces cleaner images up to ISO 400–800, usable for nighttime, indoor, and low-light portraiture, though noise becomes visible beyond ISO 800.
  • The WB850F, although employing BSI-CMOS tech, shows more noise above ISO 400, limiting usability in dim conditions.

Video Capability: A Clear Divide

The Samsung WB850F provides Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps in MPEG-4/H.264 formats, with additional HD and slow-motion modes.

  • No external microphone input; inbuilt microphone quality is typical for a compact camera.
  • Basic video controls and lack of advanced stabilization features.

The Sony A100 offers no video recording capabilities, reflecting DSLR standards of its era before video integration became mainstream.

For videographers and hybrid shooters, the WB850F is a specialized choice.

Storage and Connectivity Options

  • Samsung WB850F: Uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with one slot. Includes built-in GPS for geotagging, and HDMI output (mini connector). USB 2.0 ensures standard tethering.
  • Sony A100: Stores images on CompactFlash cards (Type I or II). No wireless connectivity or GPS. HDMI and video out ports absent.

The WB850F’s more comprehensive connectivity suits travel and casual users who want easy sharing and organization.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Battery Life

Neither camera claims weatherproofing or rugged environmental sealing. The WB850F’s plastic build is lightweight but less robust. The A100’s DSLR body offers more durability but remains unsealed.

  • Battery: WB850F uses proprietary SLB-10A battery; Sony A100 uses NP-FM55H.
  • Both provide reasonable longevity but no detailed standardized CIPA ratings available.

Practical Applications: Photography Genres Assessed

Photography Genre Samsung WB850F Sony A100
Portrait Good face detection; limited depth control Excellent with lens choice; better skin tone rendering with APS-C sensor
Landscape Adequate; limited dynamic range Superior due to sensor size and RAW support
Wildlife Long zoom; slower AF; less reliable Better tracking AF; extensive telephoto lenses available
Sports High burst rate, basic AF Slower fps but faster AF system; limited tracking
Street Discreet, lightweight Bulkier, less discreet
Macro Close focusing at 5 cm Excellent with dedicated macro lenses
Night/Astro Limited by sensor noise Better ISO performance; longer exposure capability
Video Full HD video None
Travel Compact, GPS, zoom versatility Bulky; better image quality but less portable
Professional Work Limited RAW support, fewer controls RAW support, stable workflow integration

Image Processing and File Formats

The Samsung WB850F outputs only JPEG format images, lacking RAW capture support, which restricts post-processing flexibility, especially for enthusiasts and professionals who require dynamic parameter manipulation.

The Sony A100 supports RAW (ARW format), enhancing professional workflow compatibility with Adobe Lightroom, Capture One, and other image processing pipelines.

Price-To-Performance Ratio and Market Positioning

At original retail, the Samsung WB850F sat at approximately $600, whereas the Sony A100 priced near $1000 body-only, reflecting DSLR advantages.

  • Entry level compact superzoom vs entry level DSLR distinction clarifies target demographics.
  • For enthusiasts prioritizing image quality and system expandability rather than zoom range or video, used A100 units often represent more value despite age.
  • For casual shooters desiring all-in-one convenience, superzoom portability, and video, the WB850F fulfills a niche.

The above shows the balanced overall capabilities; the Sony A100’s imaging strengths counterweight the Samsung’s feature-rich compact design.

Specialized Photo Genre Scores and Suitability Matrix

  • The Sony A100 excels in landscape, portrait, and macro disciplines where sensor quality, lens variety, and RAW are paramount.
  • The Samsung WB850F is favored for travel, street, video, and wildlife (due to zoom) under constrained lighting and action conditions.

Recommendations and Final Verdicts

Who Should Consider the Samsung WB850F?

  • Enthusiasts requiring extensive zoom range in a pocketable form.
  • Budget travelers prioritizing GPS, video capture, and image stabilization within a compact.
  • Users with minimal post-processing intentions valuing JPEG output fidelity.
  • Those needing a simple interface and automatic assist features like face detection.

Who Should Choose the Sony A100?

  • Photography hobbyists desiring system expandability via lenses.
  • Users focused on image quality, including shooting RAW and demanding dynamic ranges.
  • Portrait, landscape, macro photographers wanting better control and image fidelity.
  • Individuals comfortable managing a larger DSLR body and more involved workflows.

Conclusion: Aligning Capabilities with User Priorities

Both the Samsung WB850F and Sony A100 are thoughtfully engineered within their categories but serve markedly different photographers.

  • The WB850F emphasizes versatility, compact form, and multimedia versatility suitable for point-and-shoot needs with some advanced features.
  • The A100 delivers superior image quality, manual control, and system extensibility grounded in fundamental DSLR principles.

Extensive field testing reveals that none of these cameras competes directly in all domains; selecting one demands candid evaluation of personal priorities - be it portability, image quality, lens ecosystem, or video functionality. Consult this analysis alongside test shots to ensure your next acquisition aligns precisely with your photographic ambitions and practical usage scenarios.

Samsung WB850F vs Sony A100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB850F and Sony A100
 Samsung WB850FSony Alpha DSLR-A100
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB850F Sony Alpha DSLR-A100
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2012-01-09 2006-07-31
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 614 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech AMOLED display -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 250 grams (0.55 lbs) 638 grams (1.41 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 61
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 476
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A NP-FM55H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $599 $1,000