Clicky

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Replacement is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Sigma DP2 Merrill versus Sigma Quattro, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are created by Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the DP2 Merrill (15MP) and Quattro (29MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The DP2 Merrill was launched 5 years before the Quattro which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the DP2 Merrill scores against the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Sigma Quattro

 DP2 Merrill Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 Quattro DP2 Merrill 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016February 2012More modern by 49 months
Screen resolution1620k920kClearer screen (+700k dot)

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sigma Quattro

 DP2 Merrill Quattro 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sigma DP2 Merrill offers outside measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Sigma DP2 Merrill versus Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the DP2 Merrill vs the Quattro.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Merrill and Quattro is 83 and 63 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the DP2 Merrill and Quattro.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sigma Quattro to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged DP2 Merrill is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill Portrait photography features
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography features
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
81
you can focus manually
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
65
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
59
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill Sports photography advice
Sigma Quattro Sports photography advice
44
good megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
low fps (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
70
megapixel count fantastic (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
max fps very slow (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
54
good megapixels (15 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
weather sealing
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625g)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography info
55
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good megapixels (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
megapixel count fantastic (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
22
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic jack
22
provides face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video ( resolution)
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sigma Quattro
 Sigma DP2 MerrillSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Sigma Sigma
Model type Sigma DP2 Merrill Sigma sd Quattro
Type Large Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2012-02-08 2016-02-23
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE II engine Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 24 x 16mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 15MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4704 x 3136 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per second 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640x480 -
Max video resolution 640x480 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 330 grams (0.73 pounds) 625 grams (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $931 $738