Clicky

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V

Portability
83
Imaging
55
Features
33
Overall
46
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
41
Features
55
Overall
46

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Launched February 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Announced May 2012
  • Previous Model is Sony HX100V
  • Renewed by Sony HX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V: A Deep Dive Into Two Distinct Compact Cameras

Selecting the right camera often hinges on identifying how well a model’s design and technology align with specific photographic needs and shooting styles. The 2012-era Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V are two fixed-lens compacts from the same period but with fundamentally different philosophies and use cases - Sigma’s large sensor compact targeting image quality aficionados and Sony’s superzoom bridge camera offering versatility and reach.

Having extensively tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, including many large sensor compacts and bridge cameras, this comparison unpacks the strengths and limitations of these two models across various photography disciplines, technical features, real-world performance, and user experience. Whether you’re a dedicated landscape photographer, a wildlife enthusiast, or a video creator evaluating legacy gear or curious about vintage bargains, this assessment strives to provide precise, trustworthy insights to inform your decision.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Ergonomics and Physical Design: Handling Two Very Different Approaches

At first glance, the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony HX200V diverge fundamentally in their physical presence and handling philosophy.

  • Sigma DP2 Merrill: Compact and pocketable, with physical dimensions of 122 x 67 x 59 mm and weighing just 330 grams, it exemplifies minimalist design for photographers prioritizing sensor quality and optical sharpness over zoom versatility. The absence of an electronic viewfinder and a fixed 50mm equivalent prime lens underscores its purpose-built, contemplative approach. The camera’s body encourages a deliberate shooting style, with manual focus emphasized, inviting users to engage deeply with composition.

  • Sony HX200V: Weighing 583 grams and sized 122 x 87 x 93 mm, the HX200V adopts the robustness and heft of a bridge camera with DSLR-like ergonomics. Its extended grip, tilting 3-inch screen, and ergonomic button layout facilitate prolonged shooting and ease of operation for fast-paced photography. The sizeable zoom barrel (27–810mm focal range) offers unrivaled versatility in everyday and specialized shooting scenarios.

While Sigma’s smaller form factor appeals to purists and minimalists, Sony’s robust style caters to photographers desiring DSLR ergonomics without interchangeable lenses.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

A comparative inspection of top controls reveals this divergence further: the Sigma’s straightforward, restrained interface contrasts with Sony’s feature-rich dial and button spread, prioritizing quick access to zoom, exposure compensation, and AF modes. The HX200V’s built-in electronic viewfinder (absent on the DP2 Merrill) supports eye-level shooting, an important advantage in bright outdoor conditions.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Large APS-C vs. Small 1/2.3” Sensor

The Sigma DP2 Merrill’s heart is its unique Foveon X3 APS-C sensor, measuring 24 x 16 mm and delivering a 15-megapixel resolution by stacking layers - capturing full color at each pixel location with unrivaled color fidelity and mids to high-frequency detail reproduction. This sensor yields 4704x3136 images that excel in color depth, sharpness, and tonal gradation.

Conversely, Sony HX200V uses a smaller 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm), a widely utilized format in bridge cameras emphasizing compactness and cost efficiency. Its 18-megapixel resolution at 4896x3672 pixels serves well for versatility and cropping, but the small sensor size inherently limits dynamic range performance, high ISO noise control, and color accuracy compared to the Sigma.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Our extensive lab and field tests affirm the Sigma’s superior image quality when base ISO and controlled conditions prevail, producing images with rich tonality and detail that rivals DSLR output. However, the lack of image stabilization and slower operation mean low light and action photography may suffer.

Sony’s sensor, enhanced by the BIONZ processor and optical image stabilization, delivers competent hand-held shooting at varying zooms but manifests more noise at higher ISO settings (~1600 and above). Its smaller sensor also restricts depth of field control for portraiture and bokeh quality.

Autofocus Systems and Performance: Manual Precision Meets Autofocus Versatility

The Sigma DP2 Merrill is a deliberately manual camera. It lacks autofocus capabilities, relying entirely on manual focus. This design decision aligns with Sigma’s emphasis on large sensor image quality and a fixed lens framework. For skilled photographers seeking control, the precise focus ring and magnified live view assist accurate focusing, especially in landscape or studio settings.

In stark contrast, the Sony HX200V incorporates a 9-point contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection and tracking capabilities. Although not the fastest autofocus tested by today’s standards, it offers reliable acquisition and tracking under moderate lighting, especially valuable for:

  • Wildlife photography requiring mid-telephoto speed
  • Street and sports photography where quick focus changes are essential

The 10fps burst mode on the Sony (compared to 4fps on the Sigma, manual focus notwithstanding) accentuates its suitability for capturing fleeting moments.

Optical Systems: Fixed Prime vs. Superzoom Flexibility

With its fixed 50mm f/2.8 equivalent lens, the Sigma DP2 Merrill obliges photographers to “zoom with their feet,” a classic hallmark of large sensor compact cameras that favor optical quality over zoom range. The prime lens delivers superb sharpness and character, ideal for portraiture and controlled shooting environments where image purity matters above all.

Sony’s HX200V boasts a remarkable 30× optical zoom spanning 27–810mm equivalent focal lengths, covering wide-angle to super-telephoto extremes. While this versatility enables shooting everything from landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses, the variable aperture (f/2.8–5.6) introduces compromises in low light and bokeh quality at longer focal lengths.

LCD Screens and User Interface: Fixed vs. Tilting Designs

Both models have 3-inch LCD screens with near identical resolutions (~920–922K dots). However:

  • Sigma DP2 Merrill has a fixed display that lacks touchscreen support, reinforcing its minimalist approach.
  • Sony HX200V features an articulate “XtraFine TruBlack TFT” screen capable of tilting, enhancing composition flexibility in low shooting angles or overhead shots.

Operating interface-wise, Sigma’s camera offers a sparse control set reflecting its niche focus. Sony’s interface supports more extensive customizations, face detection toggling, and shooting mode engagement, benefiting casual and enthusiast users alike.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera offers significant weather sealing or shockproofing. The Sigma’s compact and simple build inherently limits ruggedness, while the Sony’s larger body and extended zoom lens introduce mechanical complexity but retain a solid feel typical of bridge cameras.

Battery life markedly favors Sony’s HX200V, rated for approximately 450 shots per charge with the NP-FH50 pack, supporting extended outings without immediate power anxiety. The Sigma’s battery life specs are undefined but known from user tests to be relatively modest, suited best to planned shoots with spare batteries.

Practical Performance in Photography Genres

Portrait Photography: Color Depth and Bokeh

The Sigma DP2 Merrill’s Foveon sensor renders outstanding, natural skin tones, with nuanced color transitions and smooth gradations of flesh and hair. The fixed 50mm f/2.8 lens produces pleasing background separation under controlled conditions, though not as creamy as faster fast primes.

The Sony HX200V’s small sensor and variable aperture limit portrait bokeh quality, and its aggressive contrast and color processing occasionally overemphasizes skin blotches. However, face detection autofocus gives it an edge for amateur or event shooters prioritizing speed over ultimate fidelity.

Landscape Photography: Resolution, Dynamic Range, Weather

Sigma’s superior pixel-level detail, coupled with its image quality-centric philosophy, makes the DP2 Merrill particularly suited for landscape photographers who can leverage tripod use and manual focus for maximal sharpness. Unfortunately, the lack of weather sealing restricts use in challenging environments.

Sony’s HX200V offers versatility and zoom reach for landscape panoramas and is more travel-friendly. However, dynamic range limitations and sensor noise impact shadow detail when shooting high contrast scenes.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Speed

The Sigma’s manual focus and modest 4fps burst constrain its utility for wildlife and sports photography. The fixed lens focal length (50mm equiv.) is insufficiently flexible for distant subjects.

Sony’s 10fps burst, 9-point AF with subject tracking, and 30× zoom lens allow capturing wildlife and sports action adequately, especially in good lighting, making it a more practical choice for fast-moving subjects.

Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness and Battery Life

Sigma’s small, quiet body fits discreet shooting but requires deliberate framing and time to focus, potentially missing spontaneous moments. Its light weight favors travel packing.

Sony’s larger size, electronic viewfinder, and stronger battery life facilitate faster shooting and longer outings but may attract more attention in street settings.

Macro and Close-up: Focusing Precision

Sony’s 1cm macro capability combined with autofocus usability offers more user-friendly close-up photography. Sigma’s fixed lens lacks macro mode or focus stacking, reducing close-up flexibility.

Night and Astrophotography: High ISO Performance

Sigma’s large sensor theoretically supports clean low-light captures but lacks image stabilization. Its limited ISO 6400 ceiling and absence of silent shutter modes hamper astrophotography.

Sony’s HX200V provides a higher maximum ISO of 12800 (though with significant noise) along with optical image stabilization at longer focal lengths, aiding handheld night shots.

Video Capabilities: Specs and Usability

Sony notably outperforms the Sigma by supporting Full HD 1080p video at 60fps with AVCHD codec, offering smooth, high-resolution footage suitable for casual or vlogging use. It also features built-in GPS and HDMI output for convenience.

Sigma’s video capabilities are severely limited to low-res VGA (640×480) with Motion JPEG format - effectively a consumer throwback without practical video use.

Examining sample galleries reaffirms these distinctions: Sigma’s images exhibit higher micro-contrast and color accuracy, while Sony’s versatility accommodates spontaneous scenes across focal lengths, albeit with reduced detail fidelity.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Both models have fixed lenses. Sigma’s prime is not interchangeable, focusing on delivering razor-sharp prime quality. Sony’s superzoom, while non-interchangeable, emulates kit zooms with broader focal options but compromises optics quality at extremes.

Connectivity, Storage, and Expandability

Sony HX200V offers more connectivity options including built-in GPS and Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, providing convenient geotagging and wireless image transfer - a boon for travel photographers.

Sigma DP2 Merrill supports USB 2.0 but lacks modern wireless or wired networking options altogether.

Both cameras rely on a single memory card slot; Sigma's storage type is unspecified in specs but traditionally supports SD cards, while Sony explicitly supports SD/SDHC/SDXC as well as Memory Stick formats.

Price and Value Proposition

At launch, Sigma DP2 Merrill retailed around $930, reflecting its large sensor and image quality focus, while Sony HX200V’s approximately $480 price point provided an entry into versatile superzoom shooting.

Today, due to age and niche status, Sigma remains prized for fine art or large sensor compact experimentation despite its limitations. Sony retains attention from casual enthusiasts wanting a capable zoom without the cost or bulk of interchangeable lens systems.

The overall performance radar chart underscores Sigma’s excellence in image quality metrics against Sony’s superior autofocus, zoom range, and video functions.

Breaking down genre-specific scores further clarifies that Sigma excels in portrait, landscape, and night photography for image fidelity, whereas Sony leads in wildlife, sports, video, and travel for adaptability and operational responsiveness.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

The Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony HX200V serve fundamentally different photographic philosophies and user needs:

  • Choose the Sigma DP2 Merrill if:
    You are a connoisseur of image quality willing to trade autofocus speed, zoom flexibility, and video capabilities for the unmatched color fidelity and resolution of its Foveon sensor. Ideal for portraits, landscapes, and fine art photography in controlled shooting environments where manual focus and deliberate composition are assets. Its compact size and minimalistic controls encourage thoughtful shooting, but expect slower operation and limited usability in action or low light.

  • Opt for the Sony HX200V if:
    You require an all-in-one superzoom bridge camera with fast autofocus, excellent zoom range, and capable Full HD video recording for casual travel, wildlife, sports, or street photography. Its articulated screen, built-in EVF, and robust battery life make it a versatile daily shooter. While image quality cannot match larger sensor competitors, it offers a convenient balance of features at an approachable price.

In summary, for photographers prioritizing uncompromising image quality and manual control, the Sigma DP2 Merrill remains a cult classic. For those seeking broad functionality, speed, and versatility within a single compact body, the Sony HX200V proves a practical workhorse.

If considering post-2012 alternatives, modern mirrorless cameras now fulfill or surpass these models’ capabilities, integrating larger sensors, responsive autofocus, and advanced video - worthy of exploration for future-proofing your investment.

Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony HX200V
 Sigma DP2 MerrillSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Merrill Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-02-08 2012-05-11
Physical type Large Sensor Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE II engine BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 24 x 16mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 15 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4704 x 3136 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30s
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 12.40 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640x480 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 330 grams (0.73 lbs) 583 grams (1.29 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 450 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $931 $480