Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
67
Features
62
Overall
65

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Launched October 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A99
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. The resolution of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the A900 (25MP) is pretty well matched but the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and A900 (Full frame) have different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The DP2 Quattro was introduced 5 years later than the A900 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the DP2 Quattro scores against the A900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony A900

 DP2 Quattro A900 
LaunchedFebruary 2014October 2008More recent by 65 months

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 A900 DP2 Quattro 
Screen resolution922k920kCrisper screen (+2k dot)

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A900

 DP2 Quattro A900 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro has physical measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Check out the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the DP2 Quattro compared to the A900.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and A900 is 70 and 54 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the DP2 Quattro and A900.

All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The DP2 Quattro using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A900 will give greater detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher DP2 Quattro should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A900 as a Portrait photography camera
77
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
supports RAW formats
72
you can focus manually
amazing megapixels (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography highlights
Sony A900 Street photography highlights
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
no moving screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
Sony A900 Sports photography highlights
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
71
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
amazing megapixels (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
weather proofing
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
Sony A900 Travel photography highlights
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
weather proofing
amazing megapixels (25MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony A900
59
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
73
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
amazing megapixels (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
has double storage slots
no liveview
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging info
Sony A900 Vlogging info
9
no video
9
no video
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A900
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Type Large Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-02-13 2008-10-22
Body design Large Sensor Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 25 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 6048 x 4032
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 1.5 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT color LCD TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395g (0.87 lbs) 895g (1.97 lbs)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 79
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-51 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media - Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots One 2
Retail pricing $931 $2,736