Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Older Model is Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Sigma SD10 and Sony H200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SD10 (3MP) and H200 (20MP) and the SD10 (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SD10 was launched 9 years earlier than the H200 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SD10 grades vs the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma SD10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma SD10 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Sony H200
| SD10 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sigma SD10
| H200 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | March 2004 | More modern by 107 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 130k | Clearer screen (+330k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD10 and Sony H200
| SD10 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD10 has got outer measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Sigma SD10 and Sony H200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SD10 against the H200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SD10 and H200 is 54 and 67 respectively.
Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SD10 and H200.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SD10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Sony H200 will show more detail utilizing its extra 17MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged SD10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Sigma SD10 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Sigma SD10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma SD10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2004-03-19 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 20cm |
| Number of lenses | 76 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 130k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 950g (2.09 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $198 | $250 |