Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33


95 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Refreshed by Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011

Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Sigma SD9 versus Sony TX100V, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and TX100V (16MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and TX100V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

The SD9 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the TX100V which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SD9 grades against the TX100V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma SD9 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The entire galleries are available at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony TX100V
SD9 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Sigma SD9
TX100V | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2002 | Newer by 98 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.7") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 130k | Sharper screen (+1099k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony TX100V
SD9 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Sigma SD9 has got external measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Sony TX100V has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Sigma SD9 versus Sony TX100V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SD9 and the TX100V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SD9 and TX100V is 54 and 95 respectively.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SD9 and TX100V.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SD9 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony TX100V will provide greater detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SD9 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2002-11-26 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 3 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 130 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 950 grams (2.09 lb) | 147 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $3,001 | $380 |