Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ35W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR Digital III (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very well matched but the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital III was brought out 10 months before the HZ35W and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the GR Digital III matches up versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung HZ35W
GR Digital III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HZ35W | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ35W
GR Digital III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the HZ35W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung HZ35W will resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Samsung HZ35W |
Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $300 |