Sigma Quattro H vs Sony NEX-6: An Expert’s In-Depth Camera Showdown

In the ever-evolving landscape of mirrorless cameras, two models that have drawn considerable interest among photography enthusiasts and emerging professionals are the Sigma Quattro H and the Sony NEX-6. Though launched within a few years of each other, both bring very different philosophies, technologies, and capabilities to the table. Having spent countless hours testing and field shooting with both cameras, I’ll guide you through a comprehensive comparison across technical specs, real-world performance, and suitability for various photography disciplines.

Whether you’re hunting for your next landscape workhorse, portrait specialist, or all-around travel companion, this 2500-word analysis will unpack what each model does best - and where compromises come in. Along the way, you’ll find sample images, physical comparisons, and performance scores to anchor the discussion firmly in my practical experience.

Getting to Know the Contenders: Design and Build

Right out of the gate, it’s clear these cameras target distinct niches. The Sigma Quattro H, announced in early 2016, adopts a rangefinder-style mirrorless form factor with a boxier, almost industrial design, echoing Sigma’s penchant for bold, unapologetic aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Sony NEX-6 (2013) sports a sleeker, more traditional mirrorless body, optimized for compactness and ease of use.

Let's look at their physical attributes side by side:

The Sigma measures a substantial 147 x 95 x 91 mm, feeling solid and somewhat hefty - though precise weight data is elusive, the build quality is unquestionably robust, with environmental sealing in place to guard against dust and moisture. This feature alone sets it apart for professionals who need rugged reliability outdoors.

Sony’s NEX-6 is more compact and pocket-friendly at 120 x 67 x 43 mm and just 345 grams. It’s crafted from magnesium alloy with a less aggressive profile, favoring portability and street shooting. However, it lacks weather sealing, which limits endurance under harsh conditions.

Both adopt rangefinder styling, but ergonomic considerations diverge: The Quattro H offers pronounced grips and a button layout designed for deliberate operation, while the NEX-6 emphasizes quick access and agility.

The top view comparison illustrates this contrast well:

Sigma's controls are utilitarian and minimal but thoughtfully arranged, reflecting its advanced user base, which often prefers manual control. The Sony adds function dials and a built-in flash - features the Quattro H forgoes - that appeal to versatile shooting scenarios.

As someone who toggles between architectural shoots and candid street moments, the Sony’s lighter footprint is appreciated, but I admire the engineering rigor behind the Sigma’s rugged shell, which begs to be tested in tough shoots.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Inside the Beast

One of the most defining differences - and a critical one for image quality purists - is each camera’s sensor.

The Sigma Quattro H features Sigma’s proprietary Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, sized APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm). It’s a multilayer sensor technology capturing full color information at every pixel location using three stacked photodiodes, unlike traditional Bayer sensors. This results in exceptionally high resolution and color fidelity.

By contrast, the Sony NEX-6 uses a conventional 19.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.6 mm with a Bayer color filter array. Though it offers less total sensor area and lower native resolution, it benefits from Sony’s well-honed sensor and processing pipeline.

For reference, here’s a sensor size and resolution comparison:

Sigma achieves a remarkable effective resolution quoted around 45MP (6200 x 4152 pixels), challenging the physical limits of APS-H with its Foveon layers. The Sony, with 16MP (4912 x 3264), doesn’t compete in sheer pixel count but delivers class-leading noise performance and dynamic range for its generation.

This difference manifests clearly in real-world images:

Sigma Quattro H front Sigma Quattro H screen back Sony NEX 6 front Sony NEX 6 screen back

From my testing, the Sigma delivers images with an almost painterly sharpness and impressively rich color depth - particularly beneficial for landscape and portrait photographers who demand subtle gradations and true-to-life skin tones. That said, the Foveon sensor struggles with noise at higher ISOs beyond 6400 native max, limiting low-light performance.

Sony's sensor offers excellent high ISO usability up to 25600, albeit with the expected trade-off in color depth and micro-contrast. This makes NEX-6 a better choice if you're shooting sports, wildlife, or night/astro photography where light is dim and fast responsiveness is crucial.

Autofocus and Burst Performance: Speed vs. Precision

AF capabilities and continuous shooting rates distinguish cameras like these in dynamic shooting environments.

The Sigma Quattro H utilizes a hybrid AF system with 9 focus points, featuring contrast and phase detection modes. However, its autofocus speed is notably slower and less reliable in challenging light and motion scenarios - something I confirmed with subjects in motion and dim interiors.

Conversely, the Sony NEX-6 boasts 99 AF points, significantly enhancing autofocus versatility and speed. It supports both contrast and phase detection, providing fast, accurate AF tracking in burst mode.

Frame rates also reveal a stark contrast:

• Sigma Quattro H: ~3.8 frames per second (fps)
• Sony NEX-6: Up to 10 fps continuous shooting

For wildlife and sports photographers, Sony wins decisively in capturing fast action. Meanwhile, Sigma’s more measured pace suits studio work, landscapes, and meticulously composed subjects where decisive focus precision trumps rapid bursts.

Handling and User Interface: Control at Your Fingertips

User experience affects workflow dramatically, especially during long sessions or professional assignments.

Both cameras offer electronic viewfinders (EVF) with 0.73x magnification and ~2360 resolution - very sharp and usable in daylight. The quirk lies in screen design and operation.

Sony NEX-6’s 3” tilting Xtra Fine LCD with 921k dots provides tilt flexibility for high or low-angle shots - a versatile feature missing on the Sigma, which comes with a fixed 3” LCD at 1620k dots but no touch or tilt capabilities.

Here’s the back screen comparison:

Personally, I value tilt LCDs highly for macro and street photographers needing discreet waist-level shooting or awkward perspectives.

Sony’s interface is polished, with logical menus and customizable buttons suited for quick changes. Sigma’s menu demands an adjustment period, requiring patience due to its niche appeal and dense options.

Both cameras lack touchscreen capability, which feels dated by modern standards but may preserve battery life and simplify operation.

Reliability, Build Quality, and Environmental Resistance

As touched on earlier, the Sigma Quattro H features weather sealing, enhancing durability against dust and splashes. This isn’t a common trait in enthusiast-level mirrorless cameras and sets Sigma apart for landscape and travel professionals shooting outdoors in challenging climates.

Sony NEX-6 lacks environmental sealing, making it less suitable for rugged use without added protection.

Neither camera is rated as shockproof or freezeproof, but solid construction is evident, with Sigma's build particularly reassuring given its heft.

Lens Ecosystem and Mount Compatibility

Optical versatility is essential for most photographers, impacting system longevity and creative possibilities.

Sigma’s camera uses the Sigma SA mount, with about 76 native lenses available. While this is a broad, high-quality lineup - especially known for robust primes and Art series lenses - compatibility beyond Sigma lenses is limited and often requires adapters.

Sony NEX-6 employs the Sony E-mount, widely supported with around 121 native lenses from Sony and third-party manufacturers such as Sigma, Tamron, and Zeiss. This mount is among the most versatile mirrorless ecosystems available.

For photographers who want expansive lens choice - from ultra-wide to super-telephoto options - the Sony system clearly has the edge.

Battery Life and Storage Options: Practical Considerations

Battery capacity affects shooting duration on location.

Sony NEX-6 comes with an NP-FW50 battery rated for about 360 shots per charge, which aligns with most mirrorless cameras of its class and age. The Sigma battery specs are less transparent, but informed communities suggest shorter endurance due to its complex sensor processing.

Both cameras rely on a single SD card slot, with Sigma supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC, Sony adding Memory Stick Pro Duo compatibility. Neither camera incorporates dual slots, which may concern professionals seeking in-camera backup.

Connectivity and Additional Features

Sony edges ahead with built-in wireless connectivity for easy image transfer, a helpful feature for remote shooting workflows or rapid sharing.

Sigma Quattro H omits wireless functions entirely, focusing on image quality and manual control for its user base.

Both cameras include HDMI outputs; however, Sigma features USB 3.0, promising faster tethered data transfers compared to Sony’s USB 2.0.

Evaluating Genre-Specific Suitability

How do these cameras cope with various photography types? Here is a synthesized expert rating overview:

Portrait Photography

• Sigma wins on color fidelity, skin tone rendition facilitated by Foveon sensor, and depth.
• Sony offers faster AF and greater lens flexibility for creative focal lengths. Verdict: Sigma for studio, Sony for versatile portrait use.

Landscape Photography

• Sigma’s dynamic range and resolution excel in controlled lighting.
• Sigma's environment sealing is a bonus for outdoor shoots.
• Sony delivers competent results with more shooting speed. Verdict: Sigma edges ahead for uncompromising detail.

Wildlife & Sports Photography

• Sony’s 10 fps burst and 99 focus points outperform Sigma’s 3.8 fps and slower AF.
• Sigma’s limited buffer and AF speed discourages action work. Verdict: Sony is far superior.

Street Photography

• Sony’s compact build and tilt screen make it pleasant for candid shooting.
• Sigma feels bulkier and less discreet. Verdict: Sony preferred.

Macro Photography

• Tilt screen helps framing on Sony; Sigma’s resolution aids detail capture.
• Both lack in-body stabilization. Verdict: Slight edge to Sony’s usability, Sigma’s image quality shines on tripod work.

Night and Astro Photography

• Sony’s high ISO tolerance and faster AF supports dim light.
• Sigma’s ISO 6400 max limits usability. Verdict: Sony preferred.

Video Capabilities

• Sony offers Full HD 60fps recording with multiple codecs.
• Sigma offers no video recording. Verdict: Sony excels.

Travel Photography

• Sony is lighter, more versatile, with built-in wireless.
• Sigma offers weather sealing and superior stills. Verdict: Sony for versatility; Sigma if image quality absolutely dominates your needs.

Real-World Performance Scores: Breaking Down the Numbers

Our expert testing methodology involves lab measurements combined with field trials - prioritizing consistency, reproducibility, and practical factors beyond specs sheets.

Here’s a comparative scoring chart aggregating key performance indicators:

Sony NEX-6: 78

• Color depth: 23.7 bits
• Dynamic range: 13.1 EV
• Low-light ISO: 1018 (better noise handling)
• Superior autofocus and burst shooting

Sigma Quattro H: Not tested by DxO Mark but recognized for higher resolution and color accuracy from in-house testing

While Sigma’s raw scores are incomplete, the Quattro H’s distinct sensor technology defines a niche category altogether.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Sigma Quattro H if:

• Your primary focus is ultra-high-resolution landscape or studio portrait photography.
• You shoot in harsh weather and need weather sealing.
• You value ultimate color fidelity coupled with the nuances of the Foveon sensor.
• You’re comfortable operating a camera optimized for deliberate, technical shooting rather than speed.
• You have existing Sigma SA lenses or are willing to invest primarily in one ecosystem.

Choose Sony NEX-6 if:

• You want a versatile, lightweight all-round mirrorless camera with excellent autofocus.
• You shoot sports, wildlife, or street photography requiring fast bursts and accurate tracking.
• You value video capabilities, wireless connectivity, and a larger, mature lens ecosystem.
• You want broad lens options and easier system expandability.
• Budget is a consideration - Sony is priced much more accessibly.

Both cameras offer compelling reasons to exist within their categories, but their user bases are distinct. Sony aims for flexibility and speed in a compact package, while Sigma builds on impeccable image quality and ruggedness targeted at dedicated fine art and landscape shooters.

Summary Table: At a Glance

Photography gear choices come down to priorities and style. The Sigma Quattro H is a specialist’s tool for uncompromised image quality, exhorting patience and technical mastery. The Sony NEX-6 offers a compelling balance of speed, flexibility, and usability for a broad spectrum of photography genres.

If you want a durable powerhouse that excels in static, technically demanding shooting, the Sigma’s Foveon sensor and build reward close attention. For casual or semi-pro photographers needing fast autofocus, video, and portability, Sony’s system remains highly attractive.

I hope this detailed analysis helps you clarify which camera aligns best with your artistic vision, shooting habits, and budget. After all, owning the right tool can transform your photography from a good experience into a profoundly satisfying creative journey.

Thank you for joining me on this in-depth journey through two fascinating cameras. For more hands-on reviews and image galleries, stay tuned to our site.

End of Article