Clicky

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320

Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66
Sigma sd Quattro H front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W320 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Quattro H was launched 6 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Quattro H grades versus the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W320

 Quattro H W320 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2010More recent by 75 months
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kClearer display (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sigma Quattro H

 W320 Quattro H 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W320

 Quattro H W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro H has got exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Quattro H vs the W320.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and W320 is 78 and 97 respectively.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro H and W320.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Quattro H featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sigma Quattro H will render more detail utilizing its extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography advice
Sony W320 Portrait photography advice
83
focusing manually
high megapixels (45 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-H)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
70
sensor size is nice (APS-H)
saves RAW files
environment proof
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Sports photography details
Sony W320 Sports photography details
71
high megapixels (45 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-H)
has tracking focus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
no image stabilization
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
max fps low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Travel photography features
Sony W320 Travel photography features
65
environment proof
high megapixels (45 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
66
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
Landscape photography with Sony W320
75
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
high megapixels (45 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-H)
saves RAW files
environment proof
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
33
rather wide (26mm)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma Quattro H
Vlogging with Sony W320
26
has face detect focus
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low ( resolution)
lack of mic support
26
rather wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro H and Sony W320
 Sigma sd Quattro HSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro H Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2016-02-23 2010-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-H 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 26.6 x 17.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 476.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 45 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 6200 x 4152 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Amount of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.4 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,620 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.8 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution - 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 117 grams (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-61 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $1,134 $269