Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Released January 2009
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Sigma Quattro and Sony H50, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and H50 (9MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and H50 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was brought out 7 years after the H50 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Quattro scores versus the H50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony H50
Quattro | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2009 | More modern by 87 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Sigma Quattro
H50 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony H50
Quattro | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony H50 has measurements of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") having a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro and Sony H50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the Quattro vs the H50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and H50 is 63 and 69 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and H50.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Quattro due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve extra detail having its extra 20 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent Quattro should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H50 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Highest video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 lb) | 547g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $738 | $80 |