Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W230 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W230 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro was announced 7 years after the W230 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W230 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Quattro scores against the W230 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The whole galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W230
| Quattro | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 86 months |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Sigma Quattro
| W230 | Quattro |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W230
| Quattro | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro provides physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W230 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Quattro versus the W230.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W230 is 63 and 95 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and W230.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Quattro with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro will provide you with greater detail with its extra 17MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher Quattro should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
| Available lenses | 76 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $738 | $180 |
