Two Sony Classics: Comparing the Sony A7 II and Sony RX10 for the Discerning Photographer

In my fifteen-plus years slogging through camera test labs and real-world photo shoots, I've encountered countless models that carve out their own little niches. Today, let's dive deep into a classic Sony showdown: the full-frame Sony A7 II mirrorless versus the all-in-one beast, Sony RX10 (mark I). Both were announced in 2014, representing two very distinct philosophies and user profiles - and, spoiler alert, wildly different price points too. But which one deserves your dollars in 2024?

Having pushed both cameras through intense hands-on testing - from portrait to wildlife and street to astrophotography - I’ll break down their honest-to-goodness strengths and weaknesses, peppered with practical advice and purchase recommendations. Whether you’re upgrading from an entry-level camera or deciding on your first serious shooter, I’ll help you figure out which Sony fits your style and budget.

First Up: How Do They Feel and Fit In Your Hands?

Ergonomics and physical presence often make or break a camera experience before you even press the shutter. The Sony A7 II is a classic full-frame mirrorless camera with an SLR-style body designed for photographers who want beefy control, lens flexibility, and a somewhat traditional grip.

The RX10, on the other hand, is a versatile superzoom “bridge” camera with a fixed 24-200mm f/2.8 zoom - ready to shoot a variety of subjects from landscapes to wildlife, all without fussing about changing lenses. But it’s a hefty chunk compared to typical compact cameras.

Let’s look at how they size up physically:

The A7 II (599g) feels compact and solid, especially for a full-frame shooter, at 127 x 96 x 60mm. For those used to DSLRs or larger mirrorless cameras, the grip is well sculpted but won’t overwhelm smaller hands. The body emphasizes manual dials and customizable buttons, catering to photographers who like quick tactile controls.

By contrast, the RX10 weighs more at 813g and is slightly taller and thicker (129 x 88 x 102mm), thanks mainly to its built-in zoom lens and optical stabilization components. The grip is generous, though some may find it bulky for street or travel use. The flip-out, tilt-enabled LCD is handy, but the overall heft demands a neck strap - you won’t be pocketing this one.

The top view highlights button and dial placement designed for intuitive one-hand operation but with different philosophies:

Sony went traditional with the A7 II, layering physical dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation, plus a customizable function button. The RX10’s controls feel slightly more consumer-focused but provide direct access to zoom and exposure modes with minimal button clutter - perfect for grab-and-go shooting.

The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Tech and Image Quality

If you consider yourself a pixel peeper or someone highly concerned with image fidelity, sensor specifications and image processing capabilities will be front-of-mind.

The Sony A7 II sports a full-frame 35.8x23.9 mm CMOS sensor with 24MP resolution, paired with the Bionz X image processor. This combo was top-notch for its time and holds up surprisingly well even now. Its ISO range (native up to 25,600 and extended to 51,200) allows good low-light capture with restrained noise levels. The in-body 5-axis image stabilization is an enormous bonus for handheld shooters and works wonders with various lenses.

The RX10, meanwhile, packs a much smaller 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8 mm) at 20MP. Sensor size is a major factor here: the RX10’s sensor area is roughly 116 mm², only about 14% of the full-frame area of the A7 II (855 mm²). While respectable for a superzoom camera, it means the RX10 lags behind in dynamic range, color depth, and especially high ISO noise handling. Its ISO tops out at 12,800 native (extendable to 25,600), but noise becomes noticeable past ISO 1600 in my real-world tests.

Sony’s Bionz X processor is present in both, but the difference in sensor tech explains why the A7 II scores a 90 on DxOMark overall image quality, while the RX10 rates 69 - a striking gap.

Mastering Autofocus: Precision vs. Speed

Autofocus performance is where you really feel whether a camera is designed for professional or casual use.

• A7 II: Equipped with 117 phase-detection points combined with contrast-detect autofocus, the A7 II autofocus system was a breakthrough for mirrorless at its launch. It offers face and eye detection autofocus, continuous tracking, and solid low-light focusing down to EV -1. AF performance can feel a tad slower by modern standards but is very accurate, especially with native Sony FE lenses. It doesn’t have animal eye AF, but 117 points spread across the frame give solid coverage for portrait and landscape framing.

• RX10: Has only 25 contrast-detection AF points, no phase-detection autofocus, and no continuous AF tracking. It features face detection autofocus but lacks eye detection and animal eye AF. AF speed is decent for still subjects but can hunt and lag for fast-moving wildlife or sports scenarios, often missing critical shots. For static or slow subjects, the RX10’s AF is fine; just don’t expect DSLR-level performance.

This translates into practical differences: for portraits and professional work demanding precise focus on the eyes, the A7 II shines. For casual snapshots or travel videos, the RX10 is passable.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for the Field?

Both cameras offer weather sealing, a feature I always test rigorously - damp fog, light drizzle, or dusty environments are no strangers to my gear.

• The A7 II has a magnesium alloy body and excellent environmental sealing against dust and moisture, although it’s not waterproof. It survived several damp hikes and intermittent rain without a hiccup.

• The RX10 also features environmental sealing, but despite the bulkiest lens assembly, it handles dust and light moisture with equal confidence. That said, the fixed lens design means fewer potential failure points compared to lens swaps on the A7 II.

Neither camera is shock, crush, or freezeproof, so take care in harsh conditions.

Peeking at the Displays and Viewfinders

A good display and viewfinder can mean the difference between capturing the perfect shot and missing it due to poor visibility or sluggish menus.

Both cameras use 3-inch tilting LCD screens, though the RX10 employs Sony’s WhiteMagic tech enhancing outdoor visibility. The higher 1290k-dot resolution on the RX10 screen marginally beats the 1230k-dot on the A7 II but is not a massive difference in real-world use.

Viewfinders also vary:

• The A7 II’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasts 2.36 million dots with 0.71x magnification, excellent for composing shots with convincing clarity.

• The RX10 EVF is smaller, with 1.44 million dots and similar magnification (0.7x), perfectly adequate but less detailed.

Sony’s intuitive menu system on both cameras emphasizes physical controls over touchscreen functionality - which is completely absent on both models. If you loved the tactile knobs and dials of the A7 II, the RX10’s smaller buttons may feel cramped, especially with gloves or cold fingers.

Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: Fixed Zoom or Full-Frame Versatility?

If you’re the kind of photographer who loves to experiment with glass, the lens story will weigh heavily.

• Sony A7 II employs the Sony E-mount, compatible with over 121 lenses including FE full-frame lenses and APS-C options. This system lets you mix primes, fast aperture zooms, specialty glass, and third-party options - opening creative doors from macro to wildlife supertelephoto. This adaptability is a massive plus for enthusiasts and pros.

• Sony RX10 features a fixed 24-200mm f/2.8 Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens - one of the best built-in zoom lenses you can find on a compact necked around a large sensor camera, with sharp optics and a constant f/2.8 aperture for low light and bokeh control. However, you are locked to that one lens’s reach, limiting ultimate versatility and specialty photography.

Burst Speed and Performance Under Pressure

When action is fast and fleeting, frame rates and buffer depth can make or break your results.

• Sony A7 II: Offers a modest 5 fps continuous shooting speed with autofocus tracking. The buffer clears slowly, so you’ll want to keep shots short for sports or wildlife bursts. Still, its phase-detect AF keeps focus nailed during sequences.

• RX10: Impressively pushes 10 fps continuous without AF tracking (AF locks on the first frame). Without continuous autofocus during bursts, fast subject movement can result in missed focus. Buffer depth is more limited beyond JPEGs.

If you’re shooting sports or wildlife often, the A7 II manages focus better, but the RX10 can capture quick bursts for slower subjects.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Both cameras use the same Sony NP-FW50 battery pack, a legacy choice that modern users may view as underwhelming.

• A7 II: Rated for about 350 shots per battery charge under CIPA standards. In practice, with image stabilization and EVF use, expect around 300 shots.

• RX10: Slightly better rated at 420 shots, helped by a smaller sensor and less demanding processing.

Both have single SD card slots (with Memory Stick Duo compatibility), so cards and storage routines are straightforward. Neither supports dual slots or newer USB standards (both USB 2.0), so file transfer speeds aren’t blazing fast by 2024 norms.

Video Capabilities: The 1080p Era Giants

Neither the A7 II nor RX10 features 4K video, which is worth noting in today’s 4K-flooded market.

• Sony A7 II: Records Full HD (1920x1080) at up to 60p with multiple video formats (XAVC S, AVCHD, MPEG-4). It includes microphone and headphone ports for serious audio monitoring, which I appreciate as a content creator.

• RX10: Also records Full HD at 60p, with microphone and headphone ports. The fixed lens zoom and image stabilization make it an enticing choice for run-and-gun video shooting, though it lacks higher bitrate profiles or log gamma profiles for color grading.

Neither offers in-body raw video modes or high frame-rate slow motion beyond what their codecs support.

Practical Results: Sample Shots from the Trenches

To put theory to practice, I ran both cameras through diverse shooting scenarios:

• Portraits: The A7 II’s full-frame sensor provides excellent skin tone reproduction and smooth bokeh, while the RX10’s smaller sensor and fixed lens yield decent background blur but with less creamy smoothness.

• Landscapes: The wider dynamic range on the A7 II preserves highlights and shadow details much better, critical for sunrise shots.

• Wildlife: The RX10’s zoom makes wildlife shots accessible without carrying a monster lens - but slower AF puts the A7 II ahead for bite-sharp focus on moving critters.

• Street: The RX10’s all-in-one convenience shines here, though its bulk may attract attention. The A7 II is sleeker but requires lens changes.

• Macro: The A7 II with a dedicated macro lens is unbeatable; RX10’s fixed lens is decent for close-ups but limited.

• Night/Astro: The A7 II’s better high-ISO performance and sensor stabilization help here.

Sony A7 II front Sony A7 II screen back Sony RX10 front Sony RX10 screen back

Ratings Rundown: The Numbers Behind the Scenes

It’s helpful to contextualize these findings with aggregate performance ratings:

The Sony A7 II scores in the 90s, indicative of its professional-grade image quality, reliable AF, and sturdy build. The RX10’s 69 score reflects a good bridge camera image quality but rearms with smaller sensor-related compromises.

Breaking down genre-specific capabilities shines more light:

The A7 II excels in portraits, landscapes, low-light sports, and professional work scenarios thanks to its sensor and autofocus. The RX10 finds its sweet spot in travel, street, video vlogging, and casual wildlife shooting where lens changes and system bulk are hurdles.

Who Should Buy the Sony A7 II?

If you want professional image quality and flexibility at an attainable price, the A7 II remains a superb choice.

Ideal for:

• Enthusiasts and pros wanting to step into full-frame mirrorless without breaking the bank
• Portrait and landscape photographers who demand excellent dynamic range and color depth
• Those invested in building a lens collection and need native E-mount compatibility
• Videographers needing full HD with good audio controls
• Photographers shooting in dim conditions leveraging in-body stabilization and high ISO

The downsides to know: modest burst speed, aging autofocus by 2024 standards, and battery life requiring backups for long shoots.

Current street price around $1450 aligns well with these features.

Who Should Consider the Sony RX10?

The RX10 serves a very different niche altogether.

Ideal for:

• Travel photographers and videographers craving one-lens versatility with built-in f/2.8 zoom
• Wildlife amateurs wanting decent zoom reach without lugging multiple lenses
• Street and casual shooters wanting weather-sealed, rugged all-in-one reliability
• Videographers needing stabilized full HD video with microphone input
• Budget-conscious users (retailing for about $700) who want “good enough” image quality and convenience

The RX10 is less suited for professionals needing razor-sharp focus on moving subjects or large prints, but a hell of a workhorse for grab-and-go photography.

Wrapping It Up: Final Recommendations

Here’s a quick pros and cons summary that can help you pick without wading through my ramblings.

Sony A7 II

Pros:

• Full-frame sensor with excellent image quality
• Robust autofocus with phase-detection points
• 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
• Rich lens ecosystem (121+ lenses)
• 1080p video with pro audio inputs
• Strong weather sealing in a compact body

Cons:

• Price nearly double RX10’s
• Slower burst shooting
• Limited battery life
• No touchscreen or 4K video

Sony RX10

Pros:

• Superb all-in-one 24-200mm f/2.8 zoom lens
• 10 fps burst (non-continuous AF)
• Good image stabilization with optical lens IS
• Better battery life and slightly superior LCD
• Weather sealing for rugged use
• Lower cost for full features

Cons:

• Smaller 1” sensor with less dynamic range and more noise
• Less accurate autofocus, no phase detect
• No 4K video or high bitrate profiles
• Fixed lens limits versatility

Bottom Line for Enthusiasts and Professionals

If your priority is extraordinary image quality, manual control, and growth through lenses, the Sony A7 II remains a formidable camera and excellent value in 2024. Its full-frame capabilities, robust autofocus, and solid build make it the better pick for portraits, landscapes, studio work, and challenging low-light environments.

For those who want one rugged, splash-resistant camera with an outstanding zoom to cover everything from wide vistas to distant wildlife without fuss, and video is important along with budget, the Sony RX10 offers unmatched simplicity and versatility - just don’t expect pro-grade still image quality or rapid autofocus.

Photography gear is deeply personal, but I hope my insights from years of in-field testing help you choose wisely. Whether you clutch the A7 II with its evolving lens family or grab the RX10 for wild adventure, both cameras have proven themselves loyal servants in the Sony lineup.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera be just right for your creative vision!

End of article