Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH25 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was announced 24 months after the FH25 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores vs the FH25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH25
XZ-2 iHS | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FH25 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH25
XZ-2 iHS | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH25 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH25 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39935/399359091604cb07f8172aeeea37cd860ae0919d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FH25 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc41c/dc41ce66114f8fbf80b1801a56c5e5740858a1a6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH25.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH25 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3eaa/d3eaa7da916e0db4bb0015e7cca742af7e1abcc6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85c80/85c808d385b2d66d424b1b750df37c038039ba55" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $180 |