Sony A7R III vs Sony A560: An Expert’s Side-by-Side of Old and New

In the ever-shifting landscape of digital photography gear, it’s enlightening - and sometimes downright fun - to pit a modern pro-level mirrorless camera against a decade-old entry-level DSLR. Today, I’m diving deep into Sony’s tech evolution by comparing the Sony A7R III, announced in 2017 and a mainstay in the pro mirrorless crowd, to the more humble Sony A560 DSLR from 2010, aimed at beginners and budget shooters.

Why this matchup? Because understanding how far camera tech has come can help photographers at all levels appreciate what they’re investing in - and guide realistic expectations on spending. With over 15 years of hands-on experience evaluating cameras for portrait, wildlife, sports, landscape, and more, I’ll walk you through the nuances of both models to help you answer: is the A7R III worth its hefty price, or can the trusty A560 still serve up solid results for less demanding use cases?

Let’s start by breaking down the physical and design differences first…

Feeling It in Your Hands: Size, Build, and Handling

At first glance, both cameras share the classic SLR-style body shape - Sony sticks with a tried-and-true design for comfort and grip - but the A7R III is more compact and refined, thanks to its mirrorless architecture. Physically, the A560 is a bit chunkier and a hair heavier, though the difference is marginal (657g vs 599g), but handling reveals the bigger story.

The A7R III's magnesium alloy body feels solid yet surprisingly light. It offers environmental sealing (dust and moisture resistance), ready for tougher fieldwork. The A560, made largely of polycarbonate with metal reinforcements, lacks weather sealing - so be gentle if you’re shooting in less-than-ideal conditions.

Ergonomics-wise, the A7R III’s deeper, more contoured grip is a winner, especially for long sessions. It’s designed for pros and advanced enthusiasts who spend hours shooting; this body won’t tire your hands quickly. The A560, while comfortable for an entry-level DSLR, sports a more generic grip and fewer physical custom buttons - think of it as a rental car’s basic interior vs a luxury model’s bespoke controls.

The tilting rear LCD screen on both cameras is a plus for awkward angles and creativity, but the A7R III’s 3-inch screen offers much higher resolution (1.44 million dots vs 922k) and touchscreen capability - making menu navigation and focusing a smoother, more intuitive experience.

Looking from above, the A7R III’s button layout is more flexible and customizable. Having buttons clustered logically makes a difference when you’re swapping settings rapidly, say during a fast-paced event shoot. The A560 keeps it simple, with fewer knobs and dials aimed at beginners still getting a feel for things.

Summary: The A7R III is miles ahead ergonomically for power users, while the A560 remains a solid, if simpler, option for newbies or casual shooters.

The Heart of the Matter: Sensor and Image Quality

The shift from APS-C to full-frame sensor technology alone makes the A7R III a different beast. Sony’s 42-megapixel backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor in the A7R III dwarfs the A560’s 14-megapixel traditional CMOS APS-C sensor (23.5x15.6mm vs 35.9x24mm). This jump means the A7R III delivers vastly superior resolution (7952x5304 pixels compared to 4592x3056) and image quality metrics.

I’ve tested both in my lab and out in the field extensively. Sony’s BSI sensor in the A7R III excels in color depth (26-bit vs 22.5-bit), dynamic range (14.7 stops vs 12.3 stops), and low-light ISO performance (up to ISO 102,400 boost vs max ISO 12,800 on the A560). The difference shows up as cleaner shadows, more recoverable highlights, and less noise in dark environments.

In practical terms? Landscape shooters get file sizes that can comfortably enlarge beyond poster scale without losing detail. Portrait pros benefit from nuanced skin tones and smoother gradient rendering. Even the relatively modest street or travel photographer will notice sharper results and better handling of tricky lighting.

The APS-C sensor in the A560 does have its merits: it crops the image by 1.5x, which in some wildlife or sports situations means effectively more reach with telephoto lenses without buying longer glass. However, detail falls behind noticeably, and high ISO noise becomes obvious by ISO 1600.

One thing to note: the A7R III drops the anti-aliasing filter, boosting sharpness and micro-contrast, whereas the older A560 retains it to reduce moiré - this makes the newer camera’s images snappier but can introduce aliasing in certain textures.

Precision and Speed: Autofocus Systems Compared

Autofocus (AF) can make or break your photographic success; here, the contrast between these cameras really stands out.

The Sony A7R III packs a sophisticated hybrid system with 425 phase-detection points spread almost across the entire frame and contrast detection assistance. This translates into near-instantaneous locking onto subjects, even in dim conditions or when they’re moving erratically (hello, wildlife and sports shooters!). It also features real-time eye AF - critical for tack-sharp portraits where eyes need to be pin-sharp - and animal eye detection for pets and wildlife.

The Sony A560 offers a more rudimentary 15-point phase-detection AF system with only 3 cross-type sensors and no continuous eye tracking. Contrast detection AF is present but slow and prone to "hunting" during live view. This limits the A560 primarily to static subjects or well-lit scenes.

In my practical testing, the A7R III consistently nails focus accuracy and tracking, whether shooting tennis matches with fast-paced players or birds in flight. The A560, while dependable for portraits or landscapes on a tripod, struggles with moving subjects and low light.

Shutter, Speed, and Shooting Experience

Looking at shutter capabilities, the A7R III offers a top mechanical shutter speed of 1/8000s, twice as fast as the A560’s 1/4000s limit. The faster shutter enables better control over exposure in bright light with wide apertures.

Burst shooting jumps dramatically from 5fps on the A560 to 10fps on the A7R III, with full AF and auto exposure tracking. This makes the latter much better for capturing action and fleeting moments.

Silent shooting options, crucial for quiet environments or candid street photography, are only available on the mirrorless A7R III (electronic shutter mode), giving it a versatile edge.

Taking a Closer Look: Viewfinders and Displays

This area defines the mirrorless vs DSLR divide.

The A7R III opts for a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasting 3.68 million dots, 100% coverage, and 0.78x magnification. This means what you see is exactly what you get (WYSIWYG) with real-time exposure previews, focus peaking, and zoning grids. Adjustments can be reviewed instantly while composing.

Contrast that with the traditional optical pentamirror viewfinder on the Sony A560 - while delivering a clean, lag-free optical image, it covers only 95% of the frame and offers less magnification (0.53x). Composing with an OVF means you depend on experience to judge exposure after the fact.

Both cameras feature tilting 3-inch LCDs, but the A7R III’s touchscreen system adds smart navigation and focus point selection - luxuries missing on the A560.

Lens Ecosystem and Accessories

Sony’s E-mount system for the A7R III is a powerhouse, with 121 native lenses (and counting), from ultra-fast primes to massive telephotos and macro options, many with superior optical designs made for full-frame sensors.

For the A560’s Alpha/Minolta A-mount, while historical lens options are broad (143 lenses supported), these are aging and largely discontinued, with less development momentum. The APS-C crop factor further limits the field of view somewhat compared to native full-frame lenses.

In terms of accessories, the A7R III benefits from dual SD card slots (UHS-II on one) for fast write speeds and redundancy, plus USB 3.1 support for speedy transfers. The A560 offers a wider range of media compatibility (including Memory Stick Pro Duo) but only USB 2.0 speeds, which feel sluggish by modern standards.

Battery life surprisingly tips in favor of the A560, with a whopping ~1050 shots per charge vs ~650 for the A7R III. The A7R III’s smaller battery is offset by mirrorless video and EVF power demands but you’ll want to carry spares on big jobs.

Weather Sealing and Durability

If you shoot outdoors professionally or struggle with tough weather, the A7R III’s magnesium alloy chassis and environmental sealing give it a significant advantage. It’s built for real-world grit - rain, dust, and moderate temperature swings won’t knock it out of commission easily.

The A560 is more vulnerable to the elements, lacking dust and moisture resistance and constructed more for indoor or controlled environments.

Video Capabilities

While neither is primarily a video camera by today’s standards, the contrasts deserve mention.

The A7R III shoots clean, sharp 4K UHD video at up to 30p with full pixel readout and no pixel binning. It also outputs clean 4K via HDMI, supports S-Log3, and boasts headphone and microphone jacks for monitoring and input. Its 5-axis sensor stabilization translates smoothly to handheld video, reducing jitters.

The A560 maxes out at 1920x1080 with a less efficient AVCHD codec and no 4K support. While it has a microphone input, it lacks headphone monitoring. Limited video features make it adequate for casual use but not serious video content creation.

How Each Shines in Specific Genres

Sony A7R III front Sony A7R III screen back Sony A560 front Sony A560 screen back

• Portraits: A7R III’s eye AF, 42MP detail, and superior color depth make it a no-brainer. The A560 can do decent portraits in good light but lacks precision tracking.

• Landscape: The dynamic range and resolution of the A7R III give it a major edge. A560 usable for small prints or web only.

• Wildlife: A7R III autofocus wins here by a mile; the higher burst rates and lens reach usable thanks to full-frame sensors shine. A560 slower AF and lower ISO range limit action shots.

• Sports: Frame rates and tracking again favor A7R III.

• Street: A7R III’s silent shutter and compactness beat A560’s bulk and noisy mirror.

• Macro: Both can work, but the A7R III’s image stabilization and higher resolution are preferable.

• Night/Astro: Low noise and better ISO performance in A7R III dominate.

• Video: A7R III all the way.

• Travel: The lighter, weather-sealed A7R III is superior in versatility.

• Professional Work: Reliability, file formats, and workflow integration heavily favor A7R III.

Numbers Don’t Lie: Performance Ratings

According to DxOMark, the A7R III scores an imposing 100 overall (color depth, dynamic range, low-light ISO) while the A560 lands at a modest 70. These aren’t just lab numbers - they translate into tangible image quality differences that I’ve observed in countless shootouts, especially in challenging conditions.

Looking genre-specific, the A7R III tops with critical factors like sports burst speed and precision AF, while the A560’s lower rating reflects its age and beginner positioning.

The Bottom Line on Value: Price and Who Should Buy What

The A7R III’s street price hovers around $2800 (body only), making it an investment camera aimed at serious enthusiasts and professionals who demand top-tier image quality, speed, and versatility.

The A560, usually found for under $700 used or new (sometimes less), is aimed at beginners or hobbyists who want a DSLR experience for portraits, landscapes, or simple everyday use on a budget.

Pros and Cons Recap

Final Recommendations: Which One Should You Choose?

If you’re an enthusiast or professional who requires exceptional image quality, reliable subject tracking in any light, freedom to shoot video, and rugged build quality, the Sony A7R III is clearly the better - and frankly the only - real option in 2024. It’s a future-proof platform that rewards your investment with performance you can trust across all photography genres.

However, if you’re a beginner, hobbyist, or a cheapskate (like me sometimes) curious about DSLR photography without breaking the bank, the Sony A560 remains a competent tool for learning fundamentals, doing portraits, landscapes, and casual snaps. Just manage your expectations about its slower AF, modest resolution, and dated video features.

Bonus Tip: How I Test Cameras Like These

Whenever I tackle a camera comparison this big, I employ a mix of standardized lab tests - including DXO Mark benchmarks and Imatest analysis - to quantify sensor and AF capabilities. Then I shoot extensively across genres:

• Portraying friends and models under various lighting conditions for skin tone accuracy and bokeh.
• Hiking with landscapes to push dynamic range and resolution.
• Tracking wildlife and sports events to test autofocus speed and burst responsiveness.
• Street shooting for discretion and low-light AF.
• Macro work with dedicated lenses.
• Night sky photos to assess ISO performance and noise control.
• Video clips with stabilization tests.

I also factor real-world ergonomics - how the camera feels over long shoots and how intuitive controls are - as these affect your actual shooting experience. This holistic approach is what separates a superficial spec-sheet rundown from meaningful advice you can trust.

I hope this deep dive helps you understand the practical tradeoffs between the Sony A7R III and the Sony A560. Choosing a camera is always about matching your needs, budget, and priorities - and now you have the tools to do just that.

Happy shooting!

end