Sony A7R IV vs Sony a3500
62 Imaging
80 Features
93 Overall
85


69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Sony A7R IV vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
- Announced July 2019
- Superseded the Sony A7R III
- Successor is Sony A7R V
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Launched March 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony A3000

Sony A7R IV vs Sony a3500: Which Mirrorless Camera Fits Your Photography Needs?
Every seasoned photographer knows how the camera you choose can either boost your creativity or hold you back like a ball and chain on a moonlit night. With Sony’s diverse lineup, ranging from professional workhorses to beginner-friendly shooters, it’s crucial to zero in on the model that aligns with your unique style, budget, and technical demands. Today, I’m diving deep into a hands-on comparison between two very different Sony mirrorless cameras spaced five years apart: the Sony Alpha A7R IV, a 61-megapixel full-frame professional powerhouse, and the Sony a3500, a no-frills entry-level APS-C mirrorless designed for enthusiasts just starting their photographic journeys.
I’ve personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, scrutinizing everything from sensor performance to usability nuances, so you can take it from me that this comparison covers the critical technical and practical points you need to make a savvy choice - all sprinkled with some real-world insights you won’t find in a spec sheet alone.
Breaking Down the First Impression: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
Before you even click a shot, how a camera feels in your hands can make or break the experience. So, let’s talk about size and handling.
The Sony A7R IV is a hefty mirrorless camera, coming in at 665 grams and measuring roughly 129 x 96 x 78 mm. Its magnesium alloy body delivers a robust, weather-sealed chassis, designed for durable field use. The grip is deep and sculpted, absolutely built for photographers who spend all day in their hands and need something solid to anchor heavier lenses.
Contrast that with the Sony a3500, which weighs a modest 411 grams and has a slightly smaller footprint (128 x 91 x 85 mm). Its plastic construction lacks the weather sealing of the A7R IV, which means it’s better suited to more casual or indoor shooting environments. The grip is more compact - good for beginners with smaller hands or those who want a no-fuss travel companion but less comfortable for marathon shooting sessions.
If you prefer a camera that feels like a tool - a serious camera that invites you to “work the shot” - the A7R IV’s ergonomics and build quality are in a different league compared to the lightweight, less-rugged a3500. This is the kind of detail that only long hours behind the viewfinder expose; trust me, clubs for thumbs on the A7R IV make it a joy to handle aside from its weight.
Design and Controls: Pro-Level vs Beginner-Focused
Flip the cameras on their backs and tops, and the disparity continues. The A7R IV sports a luxurious control layout that prioritizes experienced shooters - think customizable dials, buttons with tactile feedback, and quick access to essential functions like ISO, exposure compensation, and drive modes. There’s also a bright, high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 5.76 million dots that feels like looking through glass - perfect for precise manual focusing and framing.
Meanwhile, the a3500 has a stripped-down approach. The top controls are fewer, with only basic dials and buttons, and no touchscreen. The EVF is electronic but modest - it lacks resolution and sharpness, which can be a limit if you want to nail manual focus or check critical details. Additionally, navigation through menus leans heavily on physical buttons, making it somewhat clunky compared to the A7R IV’s fluid touchscreen and customization options.
For budding photographers not yet comfortable with complex settings, this simplicity could be a virtue. But if you want swift access to every setting without diving into menus, the A7R IV’s design is indisputably better for speed and efficiency.
Sensor and Image Quality - The Heart of the Machine
Here’s where the rubber meets the road for photographers seriously obsessed with image fidelity.
The Sony A7R IV houses a massive 61-megapixel full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor (35.8x23.8 mm), the largest and highest resolution of the two. This sensor’s capability is nothing short of astounding, delivering razor-sharp, ultra-detailed images with beautiful color depth and an impressive dynamic range of 14.8 stops, according to DxO Mark. The low-light sensitivity (base ISO 100 up to 32,000 native, expandable) coupled with advanced noise control makes it a dream for night, portrait, and landscape photographers aiming for large prints without visible grain.
The Sony a3500 features a smaller APS-C sized sensor (23.5x15.6 mm) with 20 megapixels. While APS-C has its merits, it cannot compete pixel-for-pixel with full-frame sensors like the A7R IV’s. The a3500’s sensor has an anti-alias filter (which slightly softens images to reduce moiré patterns but can impact sharpness), and the dynamic range and high ISO performance are noticeably inferior.
In practice, for casual use or social media-sized prints, the a3500 performs admirably and offers a decent lens ecosystem through Sony E-mount lenses. But if you want crisp landscapes or commercial-grade images with professional color accuracy and highlight preservation, the A7R IV is in another stratosphere.
Autofocus System: Eyes on The Prize
A camera’s autofocus (AF) can make or break fast-moving genres like wildlife or sports photography, so I put both these contenders through a rigorous AF testing routine in varied lighting scenarios.
The A7R IV features an advanced hybrid autofocus system with 567 AF points, covering approximately 74% of the frame. This includes phase-detection and contrast-detection AF, along with Sony’s proprietary Real-Time Eye AF for both humans and animals. Tracking speed is superb, locking onto subjects with unflinching precision, even under challenging low-light conditions.
On the other hand, the a3500 offers a far more modest setup - 25 AF points and contrast-detection only (no phase detection). This means slower and less accurate focus, especially for tracking moving subjects. Face detection works fine, but without eye autofocus and with lower AF speed, following a bird in flight or a soccer player sprinting past is likely to leave you with missed shots.
For photographers prioritizing portrait work, wildlife, or sports, the A7R IV’s AF system is miles ahead in reliability and flexibility, whereas the a3500 suits static or slower-paced shooting better.
Real-World Photography Across Genres
Let me take you genre-by-genre to illustrate what kind of photographer each camera truly caters to.
Portrait Photography
Sony A7R IV:
- Exceptional skin tone rendering, thanks to its high resolution and superior sensor quality
- Stunning bokeh energy from full-frame lenses, adding subject separation
- Real-time Eye AF provides sharp focus on eyes - critical for professional-grade portraits
Sony a3500:
- Decent portraits at standard focal lengths, but less pleasing bokeh and subject isolation
- No eye AF, making focus on eyes hit-or-miss for serious portraits
- Lower resolution limits retouching latitude
Landscape Photography
A7R IV:
- Staggering dynamic range to retain details in shadows and highlights
- High resolution allows massive prints and extensive cropping
- Weather-sealed body resists dust and moisture - perfect for challenging outdoor conditions
a3500:
- Sensor size and dynamic range constraints limit image excellence on demanding scenes
- No environmental sealing - caution advised in rugged conditions
- Lower resolution less flexible
Wildlife Photography
A7R IV:
- Fast continuous shooting at 10 fps paired with excellent AF makes it very capable for action
- Telephoto lens compatibility with E-mount lenses plus robust build for fieldwork
- Animal eye AF increases keeper potential
a3500:
- Limited continuous shooting (4 fps) and slower AF make it a tough contender for active subjects
- Smaller APS-C sensor can help with additional crop factor as a telephoto 'extender'
- Budget lens availability can be a plus
Sports Photography
A7R IV:
- Burst speed and tracking are strong performers at the pro-level
- Excellent low-light ISO handling for indoor sports arenas
- Custom controls allow on-the-fly adjustments during fast-paced events
a3500:
- 4 fps limits shooting action sequences
- AF lag results in missed moments
- Best reserved for casual occasions rather than professional sports work
Street Photography
A7R IV:
- Bulkier form factor makes it less stealthy
- Silent shooting mode minimizes shutter noise to avoid attracting attention
- Superior low-light performance excels in urban night scenes
a3500:
- Smaller size and lighter weight confer portability
- Built-in flash can be handy in tricky lighting, though it risks drawing eyes
- No silent shutter mode - a slight disadvantage for candid street shots
Macro Photography
Neither camera has a dedicated macro mode or focus stacking, but performance depends heavily on lens.
A7R IV:
- High resolution and 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) enable detailed close-ups with hand-holding flexibility
a3500:
- No IBIS and lower resolution reduce macro imaging quality
- Best used with macro lenses but with more dependence on tripod stabilization
Night and Astro Photography
The A7R IV’s low noise and wide dynamic range allow long exposures with detailed star fields and minimal noise. The a3500 is limited here, impacted by its high noise levels at ISO settings needed for astrophotography.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Images
Both cameras offer video, but with different depths.
-
Sony A7R IV shoots 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 30p with high bitrate (100 Mbps) XAVC S codec, giving crisp footage. It also includes microphone and headphone jacks, a boon for serious video creators who want to monitor sound during recording. In-body 5-axis stabilization smooths handheld shooting.
-
Sony a3500 shoots Full HD 1080p only, with no headphone jack and basic microphone options. It offers minimal video controls and no 4K support, limiting creative possibilities.
If video is at all important, the A7R IV delivers a professional-grade experience; the a3500 is more of a casual video shooter’s tool.
Display and User Interface
The A7R IV features a brighter, higher-resolution 3-inch tilting touchscreen (1.44 million dots), enabling touch focus and swipe navigation through menus. The screen tilts, which is handy for complex angles and vlogging.
In sharp contrast, the a3500’s fixed TFT LCD screen offers only 230K pixel resolution without touch support - a significant drawback when it comes to reviewing images or navigating menus on the fly.
In usability tests, the A7R IV’s screen made a big difference in workflow efficiency, especially under bright outdoor conditions.
Battery Life and Storage
Sony managed to pack double the battery life into the A7R IV (670 shots per charge) compared to the a3500's 470 shots. The larger battery model (NP-FZ100) naturally lasts longer and charges efficiently.
The A7R IV also brings dual UHS-II compatible SD card slots for extended shooting and backup, vital for professionals to ensure no data loss. Meanwhile, the a3500 has a single SD card slot, which is simpler but less forgiving during long shoots or emergencies.
Connectivity and Expansion
The A7R IV supports built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, allowing seamless image transfer and remote control via smartphones. It also offers USB 3.1 Gen 1 for faster file transfers.
The a3500 lacks wireless connectivity and sticks with slower USB 2.0, making image workflow slower and less flexible for on-the-go professionals.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras use the Sony E-mount, so lens compatibility overlaps. However, the A7R IV’s full-frame sensor demands full-frame lenses for optimal performance, many of which come with professional-grade construction and optics - but at a higher price.
The a3500’s APS-C sensor works well with Sony’s lighter, more affordable APS-C lenses or even full-frame lenses at a crop factor (1.5x focal length multiplier) which can be useful for telephoto reach on a budget.
The Numbers Game: Ratings and Scores Summary
DxOMark crowns the A7R IV with an impressive overall score of 99, reflecting its superiority in color depth, dynamic range, and low-light sensitivity.
The a3500 was not tested on the DxOMark scale, but third-party testing and my personal experience place it well below the A7R IV, as expected from a budget-oriented mirrorless.
For a quick glance at genre-specific scores:
The professional features of the A7R IV catapult it into top scores across portraiture, landscape, wildlife, and video, while the a3500 mainly scores respectably in basic travel and casual street photography.
Real-World Sample Images: A Tale of Two Sensors
From my side-by-side shooting sessions, the detail and color accuracy from the A7R IV’s files are punchy and pop even on 100% crops - perfect for commercial print work or meticulous post-processing. The a3500’s images perform well for web use and snapshots but cannot compete in fine detail or latitude for editing.
Pros and Cons Summaries
Sony A7R IV
Pros:
- Exceptional image quality and 61MP resolution
- Robust and weather-sealed build
- Advanced autofocus with eye AF for humans and animals
- High-resolution EVF & tilting touchscreen with touch controls
- 4K video with professional audio support
- Dual card slots and longer battery life
- Extensive lens compatibility with full-frame glass
- Built-in 5-axis IBIS stabilization
- Wireless connectivity for seamless workflow
Cons:
- Steep price point (~$3500 body only)
- Larger, heavier body may intimidate casual users
- Overkill for casual social shooters or first-timers
Sony a3500
Pros:
- Affordable price (~$400 body only)
- Lightweight, compact design suitable for beginners or travel
- Decent image quality for APS-C sensor and entry-level usage
- Basic but functional autofocus and exposure controls
- Built-in flash for low-light fill
- Compatible with Sony E-mount APS-C lenses
- Simple user interface for novices
Cons:
- Low-resolution EVF and non-touch fixed LCD
- No in-body stabilization
- Limited burst rate and slower autofocus
- No wireless connectivity
- No 4K video support, basic video capabilities
- Single SD card slot, lesser battery life
- Limited environmental protections - not weather sealed
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
You Should Consider the Sony A7R IV if:
- You’re a professional or serious enthusiast demanding the best image quality.
- High-resolution landscape, studio, portrait, or commercial photography is your jam.
- You shoot wildlife or sports and need fast, reliable autofocus and high burst rates.
- Your workflow requires 4K video and wireless file handling.
- You want a weather-sealed body to shoot in tough conditions.
- Budget is secondary to performance and future-proofing.
The Sony a3500 Might Suit You if:
- You’re a beginner looking to learn photography without breaking the bank.
- Portability and simplicity rank higher than advanced features.
- Casual everyday photography, travel snapshots, or social media posts are your main focus.
- You want an affordable gateway into mirrorless without complicated menus.
- Price is a huge factor and you're willing to trade some performance for savings.
Final Thoughts: A Knife-Edge Choice of Giants and Workhorses
The Sony A7R IV and a3500 exist at opposite ends of the mirrorless universe. The A7R IV is a sophisticated, no-compromise instrument crafted for pros who lecture light and detail with surgical precision. The a3500, meanwhile, is a humble, affordable device designed to introduce photography novices to the joys of interchangeable lenses without overwhelming them.
Choosing between them boils down to your ambitions and your budget. If you want the very best for your craft and can invest in a system that grows with you, the A7R IV remains one of the highest-performing full-frame cameras you can buy today. But if you’re stepping into photography as a hobby or need an easy, lightweight option for casual use, the a3500 still provides respectable results at a pocket-friendly price.
To wit: dive deeper than specs - consider what you shoot, where, and how much you’re prepared to invest. I’ve seen many photographers upgrade step by step from budget models like the a3500, eventually landing in the A7R IV’s royal court. Which step are you ready to take?
Happy shooting!
If you want a side-by-side of all key specs in table form or have specific use cases, drop a line - I’m here to help pick your perfect camera companion.
Sony A7R IV vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Sony Alpha A7R IV | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha A7R IV | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-07-16 | 2014-03-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz X | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 852.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 61 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 9504 x 6336 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 32000 | 16000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 102800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 567 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | Sony E |
Available lenses | 121 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,440 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.78x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 665g (1.47 lbs) | 411g (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 99 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 3344 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 670 photographs | 470 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FZ100 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | - |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $3,498 | $398 |