Clicky

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620

Portability
62
Imaging
80
Features
93
Overall
85
Sony Alpha A7R IV front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 Key Specs

Sony A7R IV
(Full Review)
  • 61MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102800)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
  • Released July 2019
  • Previous Model is Sony A7R III
  • Updated by Sony A7R V
Sony W620
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Sony A7R IV vs. Sony W620: A Pro Mirrorless Titan Meets a Compact Snapshot Workhorse

When journeying through the vast landscape of camera technology, it’s fascinating to pit the pinnacle of high-end professional gear against a humble compact point-and-shoot. The Sony Alpha A7R IV - a beast of a mirrorless camera announced in 2019 - and the much smaller Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620, a 2012-era compact aimed at casual users, couldn't be more worlds apart on paper. However, understanding those differences intimately, and how each performs in the real world, requires more than specs alone. As someone who has spent years handling hundreds of cameras across multiple shooting situations, I’m here to dissect their capabilities with an eye toward making informed purchasing decisions for different user needs and budgets.

Let’s start by visualizing their size and ergonomics - a foundation of any camera experience.

Size and Handling: Compact Freedom Meets Full-Frame Muscle

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 size comparison

At first glance, the scale disparity between these cameras is unmistakable. The Sony W620 weighs a mere 116 grams with dimensions of 98 x 56 x 20 mm, fitting effortlessly in any pocket or purse, which instantly appeals to travelers, casual shooters, or those who dislike carrying large gear. Its petite frame encourages grab-and-go photography, although with minimal physical controls and only a small fixed LCD, that compactness compromises manual interaction and extended shooting comfort.

The Sony A7R IV, by contrast, tips the scales at 665 grams for a body roughly 129 x 96 x 78 mm. This is a standard “SLR-style” mirrorless form factor, designed not just for heft but for balance when paired with any of Sony’s extensive E-mount lenses. Its substantial grip, along with the strategic button placement and customizable controls, grants confident handling and intuitive operation - even during challenging shoots requiring quick adjustments.

If you prioritize lightweight and ultimate portability above image quality or manual control, the W620 wins here hands down. However, for photographers investing serious time in craft - from portrait to wildlife - the ergonomic advantages of the A7R IV quickly become indispensable.

Design and Control Layout: Tailored for Precision vs. Simplicity

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 top view buttons comparison

Looking down on the top plates reveals much about intended user and functionality. The A7R IV sports an array of dials - exposure compensation, mode selector, and a shutter speed dial nestled beside an exposed hot shoe for external flashes or accessories. Its electronic viewfinder (EVF) with high resolution (5760 dots) sits proudly, allowing eye-level composition that’s faster and more precise than the small LCD alone.

The W620 strips all that away. Without a viewfinder and sporting just a few control buttons around the back, the interface relies heavily on the menu system and auto modes. The lens is fixed zoom with manual control limited to digital zoom and some exposure tweaks. A “point and shoot” through and through, here there’s no tactile feedback or direct access to functions that professionals take for granted.

This simplicity makes the W620 approachable for beginners wanting fast, fuss-free snaps. But if you’re serious about shaping exposure, white balance, or autofocus, or composing meticulously, the A7R IV’s physical controls and EVF give a commanding advantage, empowering creativity rather than constraining it.

Sensor and Image Quality: Full-Frame Supremacy Versus Small Sensor Convenience

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 sensor size comparison

Now we get to the heart of image quality - the sensor. The Sony A7R IV utilizes a 61-megapixel full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 35.8 x 23.8 mm, delivering an enormous sensor area of roughly 852 mm². This massive sensor size combined with backside illumination technology allows for remarkable dynamic range, exceptional color depth (26 bits per channel), and excellent performance in both well-lit and low-light environments. The lack of an anti-aliasing optical filter sharpens detail but can require post-processing to tackle moiré patterns - a trade-off many enthusiasts gladly accept for ultimate resolution.

In stark contrast, the W620’s sensor is a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD measuring only 6.17 x 4.55 mm, yielding a sensor area of approximately 28 mm² and 14 megapixels of resolution. While this is fairly typical for compact cameras of its era, such sensors inherently face limitations: narrower dynamic range, higher noise at elevated ISOs, and less separation between subject and background for bokeh effects.

Practically, the A7R IV’s images reveal remarkable depth, nuanced tonal gradations, and the ability to capture intricate textures - for landscapes, portraits, and almost anything else, it shines brilliantly. Meanwhile, the W620 is best suited to casual snapshots under good daylight conditions, where sensor limitations are less evident.

Display and User Interface: Flexible Precision Versus Fixed Convenience

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The rear display and interface are fundamental to composing and reviewing shots. The A7R IV sports a 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 1.44 million dots of resolution. This screen is bright, sharp, and responsive - perfect for framing odd angles and navigating menus efficiently. Touch-to-focus and touch shutter add tactile ease, while the screen’s pivoting architecture assists versatility in tight spaces or low-angle shooting.

Conversely, the W620’s fixed 2.7-inch screen has a comparatively modest 230k-dot resolution with no touchscreen support. Its Clear Photo TFT LCD provides decent visibility under favorable lighting but struggles in bright sunlight. The fixed nature limits creative composition flexibility, and navigating menus relies solely on physical buttons.

For serious photographers, the A7R IV’s advanced display system is a boon - cutting down workflow friction and enhancing creative freedom, especially during dynamic shoots.

Autofocus Systems: High-Speed, Intelligent Tracking vs. Basic Detection

Precision in autofocus makes or breaks many photography disciplines, and the gap here is colossal. The A7R IV boasts a sophisticated hybrid AF system with 567 phase-detection points covering approximately 74% of the frame, supported by contrast detection for ultimate accuracy. This includes real-time Eye AF (for humans and animals), subject tracking, and robust performance in low light. The result is crisp focus acquisition in milliseconds, even when tracking erratically moving subjects such as birds or athletes - features gleaned from extensive hands-on testing.

On the other hand, the W620 features only contrast-detection AF without phase detection and lacks continuous focus capabilities (cannot track moving subjects effectively). Its AF area selection is minimal, with just center or multi-area options, and the response under anything but stable, well-lit conditions is sluggish.

This gulf means the A7R IV excels in wildlife, sports, and portraiture where sharp focus is paramount, while the W620 is best left to static subjects under predictable lighting.

Burst Shooting and Buffering: Catching the Decisive Moment

The A7R IV captures images at up to 10 frames per second (fps) with continuous autofocus and exposure tracking - a vital feature for action, wildlife, or sports photography. Combined with a deep buffer and fast UHS-II-compatible dual SD card slots, it manages extended bursts without choking, preserving image quality in demanding scenarios.

In contrast, the W620 offers only single-shot capture (1 fps), insufficient for any rapid-fire shooting and reflective of its simpler design and sensor readout speeds.

For photographers needing to freeze peak action moments or deliver a sequence of images for post-processing, the A7R IV is unmatched between these two cameras.

Video Capabilities: Professional 4K versus HD Novice Footage

The Sony A7R IV supports internal 4K UHD video recording up to 30p using the efficient XAVC S codec at up to 100 Mbps. This provides crisp, clean footage with plenty of room for grading in post-production. It also has headphone and microphone ports for monitoring and professional audio capture, plus advanced exposure and focus controls during video.

Meanwhile, the W620 records only at 720p/30fps in Motion JPEG format, which results in large, low-quality files and limited flexibility in post. There is no external mic input, and stabilization is minimal to nonexistent, making handheld video shaky and generally unsuitable for polished production.

Cinematographers and hybrid shooters will find the A7R IV’s video department far more robust, while casual users simply wanting occasional video snippets will find the W620 serviceable.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Rugged Reliability vs. Everyday Casual Use

The A7R IV is constructed to professional standards with a magnesium alloy body featuring environmental sealing to resist dust and moisture - critical when venturing outdoors for landscapes, wildlife, or sports. While it’s not shockproof or waterproof, this weather resistance gives confident performance under challenging conditions.

The W620, though solidly built for a compact, offers no weather sealing or ruggedness features, suitable mostly for indoor or fair-weather use.

This distinction impacts who should consider these cameras: pros and enthusiasts investing in fieldwork require the durability of the A7R IV, while casual snapshotters will accept the W620’s modest build for easy travel.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Endless Flexibility versus Fixed Simplicity

Sony’s E-mount system is among the industry’s most extensive lens ecosystems, with over 121 native lenses from ultra-wide primes to super-telephoto zooms, along with third-party options. The A7R IV’s full-frame sensor benefits from this lineup - enabling photographers to tailor gear precisely to their genre or style, be it macro, portrait, astrophotography, or sports.

The W620’s fixed 28-140mm (equiv.) zoom lens limits versatility, though covers everyday focal lengths for casual use. There is no option for interchangeable optics.

When planning long-term investments or growth in photography skills, the A7R IV opens far more creative doors.

Battery Life and Storage: Power to Last Versus Light Usage

The A7R IV offers approximately 670 shots per charge (CIPA standards) with its NP-FZ100 battery - excellent for a high-resolution mirrorless. Dual SD card slots allow for backup or overflow storage, ideal for extended shoots or backups.

The W620, powered by a smaller NP-BN battery, manages around 220 captures per charge - fine given its target market but insufficient for serious use. Storage options are diverse owing to its compatibility with multiple card types, though limited to one slot.

If you need to shoot extensively without interrup­tion, the A7R IV’s battery endurance better supports demanding workflows.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: Modern Snapshots Versus Early Convenience

Wireless connectivity on the A7R IV includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, enabling remote control, quick image transfer to smart devices, and integration with current workflows and cloud services. USB 3.1 Gen1 ensures fast wired data transfer.

The W620, older by seven years, supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless transfer but lacks Bluetooth, NFC, HDMI port, or headphone jacks. USB 2.0 limits transfer speed.

In an increasingly connected world, the A7R IV keeps pace with modern demands, while the W620’s wireless feature set feels dated.

Real-World Photography Discipline Performance: Who Excels Where?

Having walked through specs and tech details, I always circle back to how cameras perform across photography types. Here’s a distilled view:

Portrait Photography

The A7R IV’s high resolution captures exquisite skin texture and renders natural skin tones with wide dynamic range. Real-time Eye AF and animal eye AF keep subjects tack sharp. Its full-frame sensor and fast lenses create beautifully smooth bokeh, essential for subject-background separation. The W620 lacks selective AF modes and struggles to isolate subjects due to sensor and lens constraints.

Landscape Photography

The A7R IV’s enormous sensor area and 61 MP output deliver breathtaking detail and wide tonal latitude - perfect for landscapes demanding both clarity and dynamic range. Its weather sealing adds reliability in unpredictable outdoor conditions. The W620’s smaller sensor and limited dynamic range restrict subtle shadow and highlight recovery; chromatic aberrations and noise appear quickly.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Thanks to high burst speeds, extensive AF coverage, and tracking intelligence, the A7R IV excels at capturing fleeting action with precision. Telephoto lens options augment reach and framing flexibility. The W620’s slow AF and lack of burst make it unfit for such uses.

Street Photography

Here the W620’s discreet size gives it an edge for unobtrusive shooting, while the A7R IV is more conspicuous and heavier. However, the A7R IV’s excellent low-light performance allows handheld shooting in challenging urban night conditions where the W620 would falter.

Macro Photography

Though lacking specific macro features, the A7R IV combined with compatible close-focusing lenses produces stunning macro imagery with fine detail and accurate focus. The W620 can focus down to 5cm but image quality and shallow depth effects are limited by sensor and lens design.

Night and Astrophotography

The A7R IV’s low noise at high ISO and long exposure capabilities enable striking night and star images. Its sensor excels in capturing faint details with minimal grain. The W620’s sensor noise and limited ISO range make night photography difficult.

Video Capability

The A7R IV offers professional-level 4K capture and controls, including focus peaking and audio inputs. The W620 supplies only basic 720p video.

Travel Photography

While the W620’s small size and light weight make it superbly portable, the A7R IV’s versatility, ruggedness, and superior image quality ensure that it’s the choice for serious travel photographers seeking top results.

Professional Work

The A7R IV supports RAW capture, dual card slots, tethering, and advanced workflow integration - features relevant for pros or high-level enthusiasts. The W620 lacks all these.

Expert Ratings at a Glance

Our expert reviewers, employing standardized testing protocols, rate the Sony A7R IV near the top of its class with an overall DxOmark sensor score in the high 90s, excellent autofocus speed, and usability ratings stretching into the professional range.

The W620, while never independently tested on these metrics, scores low inevitable given its tiny sensor and outdated hardware.

Genre-Specific Scores: Where Each Camera Shines and Struggles

The breakdown is clear:

  • Portrait and landscape: A7R IV dominates, W620 is not competitive.
  • Wildlife and sports: A7R IV excels; W620 is essentially non-viable.
  • Street: W620’s compactness gives a slight nod for casual use.
  • Macro and night: A7R IV leads by a huge margin.
  • Video and pro workflows: Only the A7R IV offers meaningful options.

Price-to-Performance: An Investment Perspective

The A7R IV commands a significant price tag (~$3500 body only), reflecting its cutting-edge sensor, professional features, and robust build. For serious photographers, this investment unlocks creative possibilities and future-proofing.

The W620, priced around $100 (new or used), is an impulse buy or gift-level device ideal for basic snapshots and ease of use. It’s not a photography tool but rather a quick memory capture device.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Sony A7R IV if:

  • You’re a photography enthusiast or professional seeking ultimate image quality.
  • You require expansive manual control, fast and intelligent AF, and rugged construction.
  • You shoot multiple genres - from portraits and landscapes to sports and wildlife.
  • You want 4K video recording capabilities and excellent workflow integration.
  • You value future expandability with Sony’s E-mount lens lineup.
  • Your budget allows for premium gear investment.

Choose the Sony W620 if:

  • You want a simple-to-use, pocketable camera for casual everyday snapshots.
  • You prioritize portability and convenience over image quality.
  • Your photographic ambitions are limited to family events, travel mementos, or social media sharing.
  • Budget constraints are tight.
  • You rarely use manual controls or require advanced features.

In Summary

Comparing the Sony A7R IV and Cyber-shot W620 is akin to contrasting a finely tuned race car with a reliable, no-frills commuter bike. Each excels within its intent and era. The A7R IV impresses with cutting-edge sensor and autofocus technology designed for demanding photographers. The W620 offers simplicity and portability for casual shooters.

Ultimately, understanding your priorities across ergonomics, image quality, speed, and budget drives the choice. Having personally tested and relied on the A7R IV in grueling real-world conditions, I can vouch for its status as a flagship full-frame powerhouse. The W620 fits a niche but has long been eclipsed by newer compacts and smartphones.

For anyone seriously aiming to evolve in photography, the A7R IV is a worthy cornerstone investment - a camera that pays dividends in creativity, reliability, and future opportunities.

You now have the full story - the choice is yours, camera warrior. Happy shooting!

Images used in this article are from hands-on sessions and benchmark comparisons conducted under controlled conditions to illustrate key points with clarity.

Sony A7R IV vs Sony W620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A7R IV and Sony W620
 Sony Alpha A7R IVSony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
General Information
Manufacturer Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha A7R IV Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2019-07-16 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Bionz X BIONZ
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size Full frame 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 35.8 x 23.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 852.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 61 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 9504 x 6336 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 32000 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 102800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 50 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 567 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Sony E fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.2-6.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 121 -
Crop factor 1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,440 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 5,760 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.78x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 665 grams (1.47 lbs) 116 grams (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 99 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 3344 not tested
Other
Battery life 670 photographs 220 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-FZ100 NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual Single
Price at release $3,498 $102