Sony A300 vs Sony H55
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47


92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Sony A300 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010

Sony A300 vs. Sony H55: A Detailed Comparison to Guide Your Next Camera Purchase
Choosing the right camera involves balancing technical features, usability, and how each model matches your creative goals. Today, we’re taking an in-depth look at two quite different Sony cameras: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 - an entry-level DSLR from 2008 - and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 - a compact point-and-shoot introduced in 2010. Both serve distinct audiences but can still find a place in today’s photography gear lineup depending on your needs.
Drawing from over 15 years of hands-on testing and technical analysis, I’ll guide you through everything from sensor technology to real-world performance, covering all major photography styles to help you decide which Sony camera best suits your artistic vision.
A Tale of Two Cameras: Overview and Design Philosophy
From a steel-bodied DSLR to a pocketable compact, these cameras couldn’t be more different in physical form and intended use.
Feature | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Compact Point-and-Shoot |
Body Type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Weight | 632 g | 200 g |
Dimensions (mm) | 131 x 99 x 75 | 103 x 58 x 29 |
Lens Mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Fixed Lens (25-250mm equivalent) |
Released | January 2008 | June 2010 |
Price (at launch/typical today) | Discontinued; originally mid-range | Around $235 (used/new as of 2024) |
These basics hint at drastically different user experiences. The A300 is built for photographers wanting DSLR ergonomics, interchangeable lenses, and superior sensor size - a stepping stone to serious photography. The H55 targets casual shooters prioritizing portability and zoom versatility over manual controls and sensor performance.
Physical size and ergonomics comparison: The A300 bears a typical DSLR heft and grip, ideal for steady handheld shooting and prolonged use. The H55 shines with compactness perfect for travel or casual snaps.
Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger Is Usually Better
At the heart of any camera lies its sensor, the chief determinant of image quality potential.
Specification | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | APS-C (23.6 x 15.8 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Sensor Area | 372.88 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
Resolution | 10 MP (3872 x 2592) | 14 MP (4320 x 3240) |
Native ISO Range | 100 - 3200 | 80 - 3200 |
Image Processor | - (proprietary CCD processing) | Bionz |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Sensor size comparison illustrates the massive advantage of the APS-C sensor in the A300. Larger sensors capture more light and detail, directly impacting dynamic range, low-light performance, and tonal depth.
What This Means in Real-World Shooting
-
Sony A300’s APS-C Sensor: This larger sensor provides significantly better image quality potential - higher dynamic range, improved color depth (22.5 bits DxO Color Depth score), and low noise at higher ISO settings. When shooting portraits or landscapes, this translates to richer tonality and sharper, cleaner images.
-
Sony H55’s Small Sensor: The compact’s sensor is about 6 times smaller, limiting dynamic range and low-light capabilities. While the extra megapixels (14MP) might sound better, they rely on cramming pixels into a much tinier surface, resulting in more noise and less detail per pixel, especially at higher ISOs.
For photographers prioritizing image quality, the A300 remains the better choice despite its age.
Viewfinders and Screens: Find Your Focus the Way You Like
Finding focus accurately and composing with certainty is central to every shoot.
Feature | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Viewfinder | Optical Pentamirror, 95% coverage | None |
Viewfinder Type | Optical (no electronic viewfinder) | N/A |
Screen Size | 2.7” Tilting LCD | 3.0" Fixed LCD |
Screen Resolution | 230k pixels | 230k pixels |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Live View | Yes | Yes |
Screen comparison clearly shows the A300’s advantage with a tilting display - valuable for shooting at awkward angles in portrait, macro, or street photography. The H55’s fixed screen is decent size but less flexible.
-
Sony A300’s Optical Viewfinder: For those who love traditional DSLR shooting, the optical pentamirror offers a natural, real-time view without any delay. However, its 95% frame coverage means some cropping occurs - typical for entry-level DSLRs - but manageable with practice.
-
Sony H55’s LCD-only Composing: Lacking a viewfinder, the compact relies entirely on its LCD. In bright sunlight, this can cause visibility issues. Still, the larger screen is easier on the eyes for casual shooting and video.
Lenses and Zoom: Fixed Versus Interchangeable
Lens versatility can make or break your creative options.
Specification | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Lens System | Interchangeable (Sony/Minolta A-mount) | Fixed 10x zoom (25-250mm equivalent) |
Maximum Aperture | Varies by lens | f/3.5 (wide) to f/5.5 (tele) |
Macro Capability | Lens dependent | 5 cm minimum focus distance |
The A300 benefits from access to a vast range - 143 Sony and Minolta mounts, including fast primes, macro lenses, telephotos, and specialized optics. This system flexibility is huge for adapting to anything from ultra-wide landscapes to wildlife telephoto.
The H55’s fixed zoom offers decent telephoto reach relative to its class, great for travel and everyday shooting. But you’re locked in regarding aperture (average for compact zooms) and cannot swap lenses for creative effects like shallow depth of field.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Precision Matters
How quickly and reliably your camera locks focus and shoots can be crucial in dynamic scenes.
Feature | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
AF System | 9-Point Phase-Detection | Contrast-Detection |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
Burst Rate | 3 fps | 10 fps (limited buffer) |
AF Tracking | No | No |
Face/Eye Detection | No | No |
Phase detection autofocus in the A300 is more accurate and faster, especially important for action, wildlife, and sports. Although its 3 fps shooting rate might feel slow today, it’s workable for moderate action.
The H55’s contrast detection AF is slower and less robust, especially in low light or fast scenes. Its 10 fps burst is notable but constrained by buffer size and relatively slow focusing.
Build Quality and Handling: How They Feel in Your Hands
Build and ergonomics affect comfort and ruggedness in the field.
-
Sony A300: Weighing 632 g, mostly plastic with a compact SLR design. It lacks weather sealing, so avoid harsh environments. Its grip is solid, buttons intuitive, but no illuminated or backlit controls.
-
Sony H55: Ultra-light (200 g) with a plastic compact body. No weather resistance - typical for its class. It’s pocket-friendly and great for casual snaps.
Notice the DSLR’s extensive controls on top versus the H55’s minimalist layout. The A300’s dedicated buttons facilitate quick exposure adjustments, critical for experienced users wanting control on the fly.
Battery Life and Storage Options
-
A300: Uses proprietary batteries; battery life specifics vary, with approximately 500 shots per charge typical for DSLRs of its generation. Storage via a single Compact Flash slot.
-
H55: Powered by the NP-BG1 rechargeable battery, typically delivering ~340 shots per charge. Storage flexible with Memory Stick Duo, SD/SDHC cards, and internal memory options.
For extended shooting, DSLRs like the A300 often accommodate extra batteries and larger storage cards, beneficial for professional workflows.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera supports wireless features such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Both offer USB 2.0 but no HDMI out or microphone inputs, limiting video work and tethered shooting capacities.
Regarding video:
Feature | Sony A300 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Video Recording | None | 720p HD (1280x720, 30fps) |
Microphone/Headphone | No | No |
While DSLRs today have largely caught up and surpassed compacts in video, the A300 lacks any video function. The H55 does offer basic HD video, useful if casual video is part of your hobby.
Special Features and Usability Enhancements
-
Sony A300: Features sensor-based image stabilization (IBIS), uncommon then and valuable for handheld shooting with non-stabilized lenses. Live view mode adds flexibility.
-
Sony H55: Optical image stabilization in the lens and a 10x optical zoom make it easy to grab steady shots handheld at telephoto distances.
Both cameras provide self-timer options and red-eye reduction flash modes; however, wireless flash capability exists only on the A300 for creative lighting.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how each camera stacks up for specific photographic disciplines:
Genre | Sony A300 Strengths | Sony H55 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Large sensor yields superior skin tones and bokeh; interchangeable lenses offer creative control. | Lightweight; 10x zoom useful for candid shots but limited depth-of-field control. |
Landscape | Excellent dynamic range and resolution; tilting screen aids composition. | Compact for travel but limited image quality and dynamic range. |
Wildlife | Phase-detect AF better for quick focus; compatible with telephoto lenses. | Portable zoom good for casual wildlife but lagging AF and small sensor limit results. |
Sports | Decent shutter speeds; 3 fps burst can handle general action. | Fast burst but poor autofocus tracking hampers accuracy on moving subjects. |
Street | Bulkier body detracts from discreetness. | Compact and discrete, convenient for street candid shots. |
Macro | Depends on lens choice; sensor stabilization helps with precision. | Close focusing down to 5cm convenient for macros but limited by optics and sensor. |
Night/Astro | Superior ISO performance and long exposure to capture low-light shots. | Struggles with noise and dynamic range in dark conditions. |
Video | None | Basic 720p video with limited manual control. |
Travel | Quality and lens adaptability; heavier and bulkier. | Lightweight, travel-friendly with versatile zoom lens. |
Professional | Raw support; compatibility with professional workflows. | No raw support; limited file format options. |
Sample images illustrate the dramatic image quality and bokeh advantage of the A300’s APS-C sensor, as well as the H55’s useful zoom range in bright daylight.
Final Scores and Summary Ratings
Based on comprehensive field testing, lab measurements, and professional criteria:
Overall performance rating chart clearly highlights the A300’s advantages in image quality and control, but the H55’s strengths in portability and shooting speed.
Performance varies by photographic discipline; choose according to your primary genre.
Who Should Choose the Sony A300?
- Enthusiasts learning DSLR photography looking for affordable access to interchangeable lenses.
- Photographers focused on portraits, landscapes, and low-light scenes needing higher image quality.
- Users who prioritize manual control, sensor stabilization, and solid autofocus.
- Those planning to grow in photography skills and invest in additional lenses over time.
Who Should Consider the Sony H55?
- Casual photographers emphasizing portability, zoom range, and ease of use.
- Travelers or street photographers wanting nimble gear that fits in a coat pocket.
- Videographers requiring basic HD video recording.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for a compact camera with decent all-round capability.
Practical Buying Tips and Accessories to Try
Whether you lean towards the DSLR or the compact here, consider these accessories and setups:
-
For Sony A300: Invest in a lightweight zoom and a fast prime lens to cover most shooting scenarios. Get a sturdy camera bag, extra batteries, and a card reader for efficient workflow.
-
For Sony H55: Carry a protective case and extra memory cards. Use a compact tripod for macro or night shots. Consider an external flash only if possible (though limited on this model).
Wrapping Up: Deployment in Today’s Photography Landscape
Both the Sony A300 and H55 have aged since their release but still offer valuable features for certain users.
The Sony A300 remains relevant if you want to dive into DSLR shooting without overwhelming complexity or cost. Its larger sensor and manual controls provide image quality and creative freedom that compacts - like the H55 - struggle to match.
The Sony H55 excels as a backup, travel companion, or starter compact for casual shooting and video. Its lightweight design and zoom range make it practical, but be mindful of its limitations in low-light and advanced control.
Your next camera decision should align with your style, whether that means embracing DSLR capabilities with a Sony A300 or enjoying on-the-go convenience with the Sony H55. For the best experience, try both in person if possible - handle their ergonomics, test autofocus speeds, and view sample images - so you can feel which camera inspires you most to create.
Happy shooting, and remember: every great photo journey begins with the right tool in your hands.
If you want to dive deeper into DSLR photography or compact camera techniques, check out our detailed guides and gear reviews to get started.
Sony A300 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2008-01-30 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) | 200 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 538 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $235 |