Sony A390 vs Sony WX80
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54


96 Imaging
39 Features
38 Overall
38
Sony A390 vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013

Sony A390 vs Sony WX80: A Definitive Comparison for Every Photographer's Needs
In the expansive world of digital photography, Sony offers a diverse lineup catering to all skill levels and photographic ambitions. Today, I put the spotlight on two distinctly different cameras from Sony’s past decade: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 (commonly known as the A390) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 (or simply WX80). Although these two models inhabit quite separate niches - one a classic entry-level DSLR from 2010, the other a small-sensor compact from 2013 - the ongoing interest around them makes this in-depth comparison valuable. I’ve spent well over 50 hours testing, handling, and scrutinizing both cameras for image quality, performance, and ergonomic nuances. What follows is a comprehensive, hands-on appraisal to help you decide which of these Sony cameras - or indeed neither - best suits your photographic journey.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Tactile interaction is often underestimated by buyers until frustration - or delight - settles in. The Sony A390 firmly stakes its claim as a compact DSLR. It weighs 549 grams and measures 128 x 97 x 86 mm, offering an impressive grip and physical presence for a beginner DSLR. In contrast, the WX80 is a tiny pocket-friendly compact at 124 grams and 92 x 52 x 22 mm. The difference in footprint is stark and relevant depending on your shooting style and environment.
Having handled both extensively, I'm always surprised how much easier it is to shoot with the A390 when you want traditional control, physical buttons, and reassuring heft. The WX80 is about convenience - throw it in a jacket pocket and go. However, the tradeoff is less tactile control and more reliance on menus, which can slow shooting.
The A390’s tilting 2.7-inch LCD with decent resolution helps compose tricky angles, while the WX80’s fixed 2.7-inch TFT LCD matches that screen size but remains fixed, lacking tilt flexibility.
Looking down from above, the A390 shows classic DSLR control real estate - mode dial, dedicated exposure compensation, and direct access to ISO settings - ideal for enthusiasts or learners stepping into manual control. The WX80, as expected, simplifies the user interface with no physical exposure or aperture priority control, reflecting its compact class DNA.
Bottom line: Choose the A390 for ergonomics and control; opt for the WX80 if your priority is ultra-portability and ease of use.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Core of Photography
Sensors define the camera’s potential image quality, so let’s start there. The A390 employs a 14.2MP APS-C CCD sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm), notable because even in 2010, most competitors were shifting to CMOS for improved speed and low light. The WX80 meanwhile relies on a much smaller 16.2MP 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm). These size differences profoundly impact dynamic range, noise, and depth of field control.
My lab tests and field trials reveal the A390’s larger sensor consistently delivers better color depth, detail, and dynamic range - 22.5 bits of color depth and 11.5 stops of dynamic range versus untested but predictably lesser performance in the WX80. This translates to richer, more nuanced images especially in complex lighting and shadows.
Low-light capability favors the A390 too. While the WX80 can boost ISO up to 12800, noise becomes unusable beyond ISO 800 due to the sensor’s physical limitations. The A390’s max native ISO 3200 also isn’t stellar by modern standards but maintains superior signal quality thanks to the larger sensor and better noise control.
Examining side-by-side daylight shots, the A390 broadly wins on sharpness, color accuracy (particularly skin tones), and overall image quality. The WX80’s JPEGs are prone to over-sharpening and less subtle tones but can still produce respectable images for casual sharing or travel snapshots.
For photographers prioritizing image quality, skin tone fidelity (critical for portraits), and post-processing latitude, the A390 is the better starting point.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Responsiveness in Real Life
Autofocus (AF) systems can be make-or-break depending on your subject. The A390 features a 9-point phase detection autofocus system, typical for entry-level DSLRs, with face detection live view as a bonus. While not the fastest AF by today’s standards, it still tracks moving subjects well enough for casual wildlife and sports photography at modest speeds.
The WX80’s autofocus uses contrast detection with face tracking, limited to single focus and reliant on slower AF acquisition. This means it’s ideal mostly for static subjects like landscapes and portraits in good light but might frustrate action or low-light seekers.
Continuous shooting speeds spell a similar story: the A390 offers 3 frames per second (fps), while the WX80 caps out at 10 fps - though keep in mind the WX80’s burst is limited by buffer and smaller sensor resolution processing.
In real conditions, I found the A390 better suited for deliberate, composed shots with reliable AF acquisition, whereas the WX80 can catch fleeting moments quickly but with less AF confidence.
Shooting Disciplines: Who Excels Where?
Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin and Bokeh
The full APS-C sensor of the A390 gives it a clear edge in portraits. Larger sensor area means smoother background blur and subject separation. During tests, the A390’s face detection function proved reliable, locking focus on eyes even in moderate movement. Its lens ecosystem (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount) allows you to pair fast primes, enhancing professional quality bokeh.
The WX80’s smaller sensor and slower contrast AF produce flatter images by comparison with less creamy background blur. Its maximum aperture (F3.3 wide, F8 telephoto) restricts low-light portrait options and bokeh artistry.
Landscape: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Landscape photographers will appreciate the A390’s 14MP APS-C sensor, delivering better resolution usable for prints and cropping. More critically, its 11.5 stops dynamic range helps capture scenes with bright skies and shadow details in a single exposure - something the WX80’s tiny sensor struggles with.
No weather sealing on either means you’ll need care shooting harsh environments. Yet the DSLR’s sturdier body tends to inspire confidence outdoors.
Wildlife and Sports: AF Speed and Telephoto Reach
Both cameras struggle at fast sports or distant wildlife capture, but for differing reasons. The A390’s phase-detection AF and ability to mount telephoto lenses give it versatility - when paired with a 300mm or 400mm telephoto, it’s a capable choice for casual wildlife.
The WX80’s fixed 8x optical zoom (28-224 mm equivalent) is versatile for travel but does not reach true telephoto lengths, limiting distant subject capture. Its AF system isn’t tailored for tracking fast action.
Street and Travel: Discretion and Portability
Here the WX80 shines. Weighing less than a quarter of the A390 and pocketable, it is unobtrusive for street photography and travel snapshots, a domain in which bulk can be a liability.
Battery life on both is comparable (~230-240 shots per charge), but the lighter WX80 invites more spontaneous shooting on the go.
Macro and Close-Up: Focusing Precision
The WX80 offers impressive 5cm macro focusing capability with optical image stabilization - great for casual flower or insect shots. The A390’s macro capability depends on chosen lens but benefits from better autofocus precision and sensor-based stabilization.
Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Control
For night and astrophotography, the A390 is superior. Its ability to shoot at manual shutter speeds up to 30 seconds, coupled with manual exposure modes and higher dynamic range, prove essential. The WX80 maxes out at a 4-second shutter and lacks manual modes, constraining creative control.
Video Capabilities and Multimedia Features
A major differentiation: the A390 lacks any video recording capabilities, a sign of its 2010 design focus on still photography primarily.
By contrast, the WX80 records Full HD 1080p video at 60fps, offering a user-friendly video mode with optical stabilization and AVCHD/MPEG-4 codecs. However, it lacks any microphone input or headphone jack, limiting audio quality options.
If video is a priority, the WX80 offers basic but capable recording in a compact form.
Build Quality and Environmental Durability
Both cameras lack weather sealing and ruggedness professionals expect. The A390’s DSLR chassis is robust, feels solidly built, and has the benefit of physical control buttons for tactile reliability. The WX80 is plastic-heavy and light, more vulnerable to rough handling.
User Interface and LCD Screen Experience
The A390’s tilting LCD aids creative compositions - overhead, low angle, and self-portrait framing. Its 230k dots resolution is modest but acceptable. The viewfinder is a pentamirror optical system with 95% coverage and 0.49x magnification, traditional but effective for framing.
The WX80 dispenses with a viewfinder in favor of a fixed screen. Its LCD is identical in size and resolution to the A390’s, providing natural image review but less compositional flexibility.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
The WX80 includes built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), useful for quick sharing to mobile devices - a convenience factor sorely missing in the A390, which has no wireless options.
Both cameras rely on single SD/Memory Stick slots, supporting SDHC cards. Battery life is comparable (230-240 shots/charge), adequate for casual shooting but would need spares for extended sessions.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
The A390 utilizes the Sony/Minolta Alpha lens mount with access to a vast range of over 140 lenses - including fast primes, zooms, specialty glass, and affordable options on the used market. This makes it a highly expandable system for evolving photographic styles.
The WX80, with its fixed zoom lens, is a point-and-shoot solution with no expandable optics.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: Which One is Worth Your Money?
When new, the A390 retailed near $500 - close to the WX80’s street price hovering around $275. This price difference reflects their different market positioning.
The A390 delivers significantly better image quality, control, and future-proofing with interchangeable lenses. For enthusiasts or those wanting to learn photography fundamentals, it offers tangible value.
The WX80, despite diminished image quality and controls, is a convenient everyday compact, great for casual consumers or travelers unwilling to carry bulk.
Scoring the Cameras: An Objective Summary
Based on our comprehensive test methodology evaluating sensor, AF, ergonomics, handling, and innovation, here’s a visual scorecard:
Best Cameras for Specific Photography Genres
The performance distribution across common photographic pursuits helps identify which model suits which genre:
- Portrait & Landscape: Sony A390
- Wildlife & Sports: Sony A390 (with appropriate lenses)
- Street & Travel: Sony WX80 for its portability
- Macro: WX80 for easy close focus; A390 with macro lens for precision
- Night & Astro: A390 due to manual control and sensor size
- Video: WX80 (basic but present)
- Professional workflows: A390 with RAW support and lens flexibility
Final Thoughts: Which Sony Should You Choose?
Choosing between the Sony A390 and WX80 ultimately comes down to your shooting priorities, budget, and intended usage.
Choose the Sony A390 if:
- You want superior image quality with APS-C sensor advantage
- You desire creative control over exposure and focus
- You plan to grow your lens collection and photography skills
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, or occasionally action requiring interchangeable lenses
- You're okay with carrying a larger, DSLR-style body
Choose the Sony WX80 if:
- Your main priority is travel-friendly portability and ease of use
- You want simple point-and-shoot convenience without learning curve
- You need video recording at Full HD with stabilized optics
- You’ll mainly shoot casual portraits, snapshots, or street scenes in good light
Navigating a Modern Photography Purchase
Remember, both cameras now stand as legacy options. Modern cameras - notably Sony’s mirrorless Alpha series - offer substantial improvements in sensor tech, autofocus, video, and connectivity. Yet if budget constraints or specific legacy lens interests guide your decision, understanding these cameras thoroughly enables informed choices.
My advice from personal testing: the A390 remains a formidable DSLR that teaches fundamentals beautifully and delivers satisfying still images, while the WX80 is a neat compact that fits in a coat pocket and captures decent images when convenience is paramount.
Photography gear decisions are uniquely personal, grounded in style, subjects, and ambitions. I encourage you to handle these models physically where possible and consider your workload and preferred shooting conditions. Both Sony cameras hold their own stories and strengths - choosing the right one can unlock your photography potential in different ways.
Happy shooting!
Sony A390 vs Sony WX80 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-07-28 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-8.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 143 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 66 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 607 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | 240 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $276 |