Clicky

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80

Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
38
Overall
38

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 Key Specs

Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Revealed October 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A99
Sony WX80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
  • 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80: A Thorough Journey from Full-Frame DSLR to Compact Convenience

In the world of photography, Sony’s name represents a broad spectrum - from flagship professional bodies to pocket-sized compacts. Today, we're diving deep into two distinct representatives from that lineup: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 (hereafter the A900), a landmark full-frame DSLR from 2008, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 (the WX80), a humble but capable compact from 2013. Despite their shared brand lineage, these cameras target profoundly different users and scenarios.

Having spent countless hours shooting through varied conditions and genres with both DSLRs and compacts, I’ll dissect their capabilities side-by-side with an eye for actual use in the field. We’ll explore everything from sensor technology to ergonomics, then go through performance in key photography disciplines, and finally, value and recommendations to help you decide which might fit your needs.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

Let's start where it all begins - the physical experience of handling these cameras.

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 size comparison

The A900 is a classic mid-size SLR, weighing in at 895 grams with generous dimensions (156x117x82mm). It demands respect and deliberately so, built for photographers who prioritize a sure grip and robust operation. Its magnesium alloy chassis and environmental sealing confirm it was designed as a workhorse, capable of enduring tough outdoor conditions without flinching.

Meanwhile, the WX80 is a stark contrast - a tiny point-and-shoot marvel at just 124 grams and a compact profile (92x52x22mm). It slips easily into pockets or purse side compartments, begging to be your travel or casual shooter. But here, design prioritizes portability over ruggedness; there’s no weather sealing, and the build is lightweight plastic.

Ergonomically, the A900 provides a confident, tactile experience. Buttons are spaced thoughtfully, and the solid grip invites long shooting sessions without fatigue. The WX80’s small form means it requires a lighter touch - its smaller buttons and minimal controls reflect its intended audience: casual photographers who want hassle-free shooting.

This size and ergonomic divide shapes much of what comes next. The A900 is a tool for deliberate craft, the WX80 a grab-and-go configuration for spontaneous capture.

Top-Down Control and Usability: How They Operate

Peeking over the tops of these two cameras reveals their respective design priorities.

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 top view buttons comparison

The A900 features dedicated dials and physical buttons for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, ISO, and drive modes. This hands-on control is invaluable when shooting portraits or landscapes where rapid manual adjustments improve creativity and precision. A dedicated top LCD displays shooting parameters without digging into menus - a subtle but very appreciated touch at this level.

Contrast that with the WX80’s clean but minimal control layout: a mode dial and a few buttons primarily for playback or menu access. It’s perfect for novices or anyone wanting auto or scene modes to dictate exposure. There’s no dedicated dial for manual focus or shutter speed; everything is menu-driven or auto-handled. The lack of advanced controls might frustrate enthusiasts seeking creative control but matches the point-and-shoot’s ease-of-use approach.

For photographers valuing quick, tactile settings changes, the A900 wins here hands down.

Sensors and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At the core of any camera is its sensor, dictating resolution, dynamic range, and low light abilities.

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 sensor size comparison

The Sony A900 employs a 35.9 x 24mm full-frame CMOS sensor with a whopping 24.6-megapixel resolution. Back in 2008, this was a groundbreaking offering, capturing vast amounts of detail suitable for professional portraits, landscapes, and large prints. The sensor uses an anti-aliasing filter, which slightly softens images but reduces moiré artifacts. Its ISO performance fares well, with a native range of 100-6400, supporting clean images even in challenging lighting.

The WX80 uses a much smaller 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with 16MP resolution. It’s respectable for a compact of its class, capable of decent 4608x3456 images. However, the sensor size limits dynamic range and high ISO performance compared to full-frame. Its maximum native ISO is 3200, with extended modes up to 12800, but noise becomes a factor at higher sensitivities.

In practical terms, shots from the A900 exhibit vastly better tonal gradation, color depth, and detail retrieval. Colors are rich, and shadows preserve more nuance. The WX80 is sufficient for everyday snaps and web sharing but pales in comparison when physical prints or detailed cropping come into play.

The Rear View: Displays and Interface

In modern photography, screen usability can make or break the workflow, especially when reviewing shots or composing.

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The A900 sports a 3-inch fixed TFT Xtra Fine LCD with 922k dots - a crisp, bright display ideal for previewing images in the field. While it lacks touchscreen functionality or articulating movement, the size and quality suffice for detailed assessment and menu navigation.

The WX80 has a marginally smaller 2.7-inch TFT LCD with only 230k dots resolution - a visible step down in sharpness and detail. No touchscreen here either, and menu interactions rely on buttons.

Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder - a pentaprism optical viewfinder in the A900 and none on the WX80. As such, relying on the LCD in bright daylight can prove challenging, especially on the WX80’s reflective, low-res screen.

If reviewing fine details on-screen is critical to your process, the A900’s display noticeably outclasses the WX80.

Autofocus and Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment

Next, let’s dig into how well each system acquires focus and tracks subjects under real working conditions.

The A900 features a traditional phase-detection autofocus system with 9 focus points (though cross-type points are undocumented). It supports single, continuous, selective, and multi-area AF modes. The focusing is fast and accurate in good light, effective for portraits, landscapes, and moderate action work. However, it lacks modern face or eye detection and autofocus tracking is fairly basic by today’s standards.

The WX80 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and multi-area AF. It can track moving subjects to a degree, though limited by sensor size and processing power. Continuous AF and touch AF facilitate easier focus in casual shooting. Its autofocus speed is impressive within typical bright scenarios but slows in low light or complex scenes.

Importantly, the A900 shoots at 5 frames per second - respectable for a full-frame DSLR of its era - great for moderate sports and wildlife timing. The WX80, on the other hand, can reach up to 10fps burst shooting, but due to smaller buffer and image size, it suits short spurts of action capture better than sustained sports use.

For wildlife or sports photographers, the A900 still delivers a seasoned experience but modern cameras have since evolved. The WX80’s autofocus system is designed more for casual, static subjects or mild movement.

Exploring Photography Genres: Real-World Performance

Let's move past specs and see how both cameras fare across different photography disciplines.

Portrait Photography

The A900’s full-frame sensor and 24MP resolution create breathtaking skin tones and subtle gradations. Professional portrait lenses on the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount - such as 85mm f/1.4 or 135mm f/2 primes - enable beautiful bokeh and crisp focus on eyes. The camera’s exposure modes and manual control give precision when working with studio lighting or natural light portraits, making tricky lighting setups easier.

The WX80’s compact fixed lens and smaller sensor limit bokeh effects and dynamic range. It includes face detection but lacks advanced eye autofocus. Portraits are serviceable for family snaps or social media but lack the artistic latitude to isolate subjects with creamy backgrounds or capture flawless skin tones.

Landscape Photography

In landscape shooting, dynamic range and resolution matter most. Here, the A900 shines due to sensor size and high resolution, delivering files ripe for large prints or cropping. Its weather-sealed magnesium body can withstand mist, dust, or light rain encountered outdoors. Manual shooting modes allow fine-tuned exposures for HDR or bracketing, helping preserve highlights and shadows in tricky light.

The WX80 is constrained by its small sensor’s limited dynamic range and low-light noise handling. USB and HDMI ports do not translate to high-level editing versatility. Weather sealing is absent, so shooting in inclement conditions requires more caution. Still, its wide 28mm equivalent focal length at the wide-end gives nice compositional flexibility for casual landscapes.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

The A900’s 5fps continuous shooting and phase-detection AF help moderately with action, though it is not a high-velocity sports camera by contemporary standards. Paired with telephoto lenses in the 300-600mm range adapted to the mount, it remains capable for wildlife work. The robust construction and grip make handheld shooting more manageable despite longer lenses’ weight.

The WX80’s fast burst speed offers decent chance for quick frames, but the small sensor and fixed lens limit extended reach and image quality at long distances. Autofocus tracking is modest but improved for a compact. The WX80 is better suited for casual sports or pets in the park than pro-level action.

Street and Travel Photography

At nearly 900g and bulky dimensions, the A900 is not your street photography champion or a pocket travel camera. Still, it offers unbeatable image quality for dedicated travel photographers who prioritize intentional captures. Its battery life of 880 shots per charge is generous for multi-day trips.

The WX80 excels in portability, with a sleek profile and lightweight design perfect for street shooting and carry-on travel. Built-in Wi-Fi wireless connectivity aids quick sharing, and the lens covers an 8x zoom (28-224mm equivalent) satisfying a range of perspectives. Battery life is more modest (240 shots per charge), so carrying spare batteries is advised.

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

Neither camera features specialized macro systems or focus stacking, but the WX80’s 5cm macro focus distance allows casual close-ups, while the A900 can employ macro lenses from the Alpha lineup for greater magnification and precision control.

Night and astro photography benefit enormously from the A900’s large sensor and ISO capabilities, delivering cleaner images and exposing faint stars well. Bulb mode and manual exposure aid long exposures. By contrast, the WX80’s sensor size and max ISO limit its astrophotography potential to brighter night scenes or cityscapes.

Video Capabilities

The A900 has no video recording capability - expected for a 2008 DSLR before video became standard. Sony later introduced video in mirrorless systems.

The WX80 shoots Full HD 1080p video up to 60fps with optical stabilization, adequate for casual videos but with limited manual controls and no microphone input for external audio. Its video quality is surprisingly good for a compact but lacks professional-grade flexibility.

Building on the Inside: Technical Features and Workflow

Battery Life and Storage

The A900 offers an impressive 880 shots per charge using the large NP-FM500H battery pack, perfect for long shoots without frequent changes. Dual memory card slots supporting CF and Memory Stick Duo offer flexible storage and redundancy - important for professionals who cannot risk data loss.

The WX80 manages around 240 shots per battery (NP-BN), less endurance but acceptable given its compact size. Storage is handled via SD/SDHC/SDXC or Memory Stick formats with a single slot.

Connectivity and Extras

The A900 includes USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs but no wireless or Bluetooth - standard for its time. The WX80, in comparison, boasts built-in Wi-Fi for easier image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps, adding modern convenience for casual shooters.

Lens Ecosystem

This is where the A900 really stands out - the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount supports over 140 lenses spanning wide-angle, telephoto, primes, macros, and specialty optics. This extensive ecosystem enables photographers to tailor their setup precisely for any genre.

The WX80’s fixed lens design means no lens changes - a limitation but also a simplicity feature. Its zoom lens is serviceable for street and travel but limits creative framing.

Performance Scores and Summaries: The Numbers Speak

Sony A900 scores strongly across image quality (DXOmark overall 79), color depth (23.7 bits), and dynamic range (12.3 EV). Low light ISO performance is solid (ISO 1431). Wrist-mounted sensor stabilization adds sharpness advantages for varying scenarios.

The WX80 lacks formal DXOmark testing but, as expected, performs within the small sensor compact range - adequate for casual use but notably inferior in image quality metrics due to sensor size constraints.

How They Stack Up Across Photography Genres

  • Portraits: A900 leads with bokeh control, color fidelity, and manual focus precision.
  • Landscape: A900 dominates thanks to sensor size, weather sealing, and resolution.
  • Wildlife: A900’s interchangeable telephotos and decent burst rate win.
  • Sports: Neither camera excels, but A900 edges ahead with phase-detection AF and continuous shooting.
  • Street: WX80 offers much more portability and discretion.
  • Macro: A900 with dedicated lenses outclasses WX80’s casual macro mode.
  • Night/Astro: A900’s full-frame sensor is superior for low light.
  • Video: WX80 provides basic HD video capability; A900 has no video.
  • Travel: WX80 is far lighter, more compact, Wi-Fi enabled.
  • Professional Work: A900’s durability, file options (raw), and battery life make it suited for professional use.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which?

After extensive use and analysis, here’s how I’d advise potential buyers:

Choose the Sony A900 if:

  • You demand highest image quality with full-frame detail and dynamic range
  • You work in portraits, landscape, or controlled studio settings requiring manual control
  • You want professional-grade durability with weather sealing
  • You need a wide and trusted lens selection for creative flexibility
  • You shoot in low light or nighttime conditions regularly
  • You are comfortable with a heavier, larger DSLR for deliberate shooting

Choose the Sony WX80 if:

  • You want a pocketable, easy-to-use travel or street camera
  • Video recording in HD matters in addition to stills
  • You favor convenience and wireless sharing over manual control
  • You’re a casual user or beginner looking for simple point-and-shoot operation
  • Budget is tight (the camera is significantly cheaper)
  • Your shooting often happens in bright daylight or well-lit conditions

Wrapping Up: Two Cameras, Different Worlds

Comparing the A900 and WX80 is almost like comparing a thoroughbred stallion to a nimble terrier dog. The A900 is the seasoned professional, capable of greatness with the right handler - sturdy, powerful, and versatile. The WX80 is the playful companion, always ready to accompany you with unpretentious ease and surprising spirit.

Both fulfill distinct photographic roles admirably, and knowing your priorities and shooting style is the key to choosing wisely. The A900 demands dedication, care, and investment but rewards with exquisite images. The WX80 requires almost no prior knowledge and puts decent images in your hands at a friendly price point.

Whichever you pick, Sony’s engineering ensures you get a reliable capture partner. Happy shooting!

For additional side-by-side detailed testing, lens compatibility charts, and sample files from both cameras, feel free to reach out in the comments or follow up with my full lab results and field galleries.

Sony A900 vs Sony WX80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A900 and Sony WX80
 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2008-10-22 2013-01-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Bionz BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Full frame 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 35.9 x 24mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 861.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 25 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 6048 x 4032 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Sony/Minolta Alpha fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-8.0
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 143 -
Focal length multiplier 1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 922k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Xtra Fine color LCD TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 895 grams (1.97 lbs) 124 grams (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 79 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 1431 not tested
Other
Battery life 880 photographs 240 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-FM500H NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Two One
Price at release $2,736 $276