Clicky

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
55
Overall
53
Sony Alpha NEX-3 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V front
Portability
89
Imaging
44
Features
57
Overall
49

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V Key Specs

Sony NEX-3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • New Model is Sony NEX-C3
Sony HX50V
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5 - 6.3) lens
  • 272g - 108 x 64 x 38mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Succeeded the Sony HX30V
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right camera is a nuanced decision, especially when two models come from the same manufacturer but serve very different needs. The Sony NEX-3 and Sony HX50V represent distinct approaches: the former an entry-level mirrorless system with interchangeable lenses and APS-C sensor, the latter a compact superzoom with a fixed small sensor. Both have their merits, and I have tested thousands of cameras including these over the years to help you understand exactly what to expect, beyond specs on paper.

In this detailed comparison running through photographic genres, technical performance, usability, and value, you’ll see where each camera shines and where compromises matter. Whether you’re an enthusiast seeking well-rounded image quality or a traveler chasing versatility in a pocket-friendly package, this guide will help you pick your next tool wisely.

Physical Design and Handling: Size, Controls, and Ergonomics

How comfortable a camera feels can influence how much you shoot, so let’s first look at size and ergonomics.

The Sony NEX-3 embodies a classic rangefinder-style mirrorless design typical of early Sony NEX cameras. Its body measures 117 x 62 x 33 mm and weighs 297g with battery, lending a compact but substantial grip. The layout favors quick access to aperture/shutter priority and manual modes, essential for creative control. This is evident from the well-thought-out control placement and the tilting 3.0-inch TFT LCD screen.

The HX50V is smaller and lighter, at 108 x 64 x 38 mm and 272g, designed as a pocket-friendly superzoom. The controls are simpler, no doubt to maintain compactness and ease of use for casual and travel photographers. It has a fixed lens, so no lens changes required, and includes an electronic viewfinder option (though not built-in). The screen is a fixed 3-inch XtraFine LCD.

Here’s a quick visual to understand the physical differences:

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V size comparison

From my hands-on sessions, the NEX-3 offers more grip confidence and feels like a traditional camera, better suited for sustained shooting. The HX50V, while pleasantly compact, feels a bit tight for grip if you have larger hands, but wins for ultra-portability.

Top Panel and Control Layout

Control layout can accelerate your workflow or become a hindrance. The NEX-3 features dedicated dials for exposure, and a top plate free of clutter - a positive for those who prefer tactile adjustments. The HX50V’s top view reveals a more compact power and zoom button arrangement, plus an integrated electronic viewfinder pop-up button.

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V top view buttons comparison

The NEX-3’s approach empowers photographers who want manual override, while the HX50V is more streamlined for point-and-shoot convenience with the potential for some manual tweaks.

Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters in Imaging Performance

The heart of any camera’s image-making capability is its sensor. Here is where the two diverge significantly.

Feature Sony NEX-3 Sony HX50V
Sensor Type APS-C CMOS 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size (mm) 23.4 x 15.6 (365 mm² area) 6.17 x 4.55 (28 mm² area)
Resolution 14 MP 20 MP
Max ISO 12800 3200 (native), boost to 12800
RAW Support Yes No
AA Filter Yes Yes

The critical sensor size difference - APS-C vs. 1/2.3-inch compact sensor - translates into image quality and creative control. The NEX-3’s large sensor area allows for superior noise handling, dynamic range, and depth of field control. On the other hand, the HX50V’s sensor, while higher resolution nominally, physically captures less light, which impacts image quality especially in low light and highly detailed landscape scenarios.

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V sensor size comparison

From my lab and field tests using standardized charts and real scenes, the NEX-3 scores a decent 68 on DxOMark, emphasizing its higher usable ISO and color depth advantages. The HX50V’s smaller sensor puts it at a disadvantage for pixel-level detail and high ISO cleanliness. However, its larger zoom lens and image stabilization can compensate somewhat in versatility.

LCD and Viewfinder Experience

Both cameras sport a 3-inch LCD, but with different designs. The NEX-3 uses a tilting TFT Xtra Fine LCD at 920k dots, allowing creative framing from high or low angles - a valuable feature for portrait and street photographers. The HX50V’s LCD is fixed but similarly high-resolution.

Neither camera includes a built-in electronic viewfinder, but the HX50V optionally supports an external EVF.

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V Screen and Viewfinder comparison

In bright outdoor environments, the NEX-3’s tilting screen improves compositional flexibility, especially for macro or landscape shots done at awkward angles. The HX50V’s fixed screen can be limiting here, but the built-in GPS and Wi-Fi connectivity aid instant sharing.

Autofocus Systems and Real-World Focusing Performance

The autofocus system underpins your shooting success across genres.

Feature Sony NEX-3 Sony HX50V
AF System Type Contrast-detection AF Contrast-detection AF
Focus Points 25 (face detection capable) Unknown AF points, face and tracking
AF Modes Single, Continuous Single AF, Tracking
AF Tracking No Yes
Manual Focus Yes Yes
AF Performance Moderate in good light Good tracking, fast single AF

The NEX-3’s contrast-detection AF is adequate for casual shooting and portraits, but it lacks sophisticated continuous tracking or phase-detection points seen in modern cameras. It does support face detection, helping with portraits.

The HX50V, despite its small sensor, adds AF tracking capabilities and faster continuous shooting at 10 fps (vs. 7 fps on the NEX-3), making it more competent for casual wildlife or sports photography at short distances. However, due to smaller sensor and diffraction limits, image quality will not match the NEX-3’s for detailed wildlife or sports.

Photography Genres: Strengths and Weaknesses Explored

Let’s now explore these cameras through the lens of specific genres and real-world use cases.

Portrait Photography

Portraits depend on skin tone accuracy, pleasing bokeh, and precise eye detection.

  • Sony NEX-3: Thanks to its APS-C sensor, the camera achieves excellent skin tone rendition and beautiful background separation with fast Sony E-mount lenses. Face detection autofocus eases capturing portraits with accurate focus on eyes. However, no eye-detection AF limits active tracking of moving subjects’ eyes.
  • Sony HX50V: Limited by small sensor size and slower lens max aperture (f/3.5-6.3), it’s harder to create selective background blur. Face detection works but shallow depth of field is elusive. Portraits tend to have more noise and less sharpness at longer zooms.

Who should pick which? For serious portraits, the NEX-3 with its interchangeable lenses and better sensor depth is preferable. Casual snapshots and travel portraits can be handled by the HX50V adequately.

Landscape Photography

Landscape work relies heavily on resolution, dynamic range, and weather robustness.

  • NEX-3: Large APS-C sensor delivers 14MP with extended dynamic range (~12 stops), excellent for capturing shadow and highlight detail. Lack of weather sealing is a downside for harsh fieldwork. Tilting screen aids framing unusual compositions.
  • HX50V: Smaller sensor limits dynamic range and resolution. However, the long telephoto zoom allows capturing distant landscapes unreachable with standard lenses, a plus for travel. No weather sealing.

Landscape photographers desiring fine details and post-processing flexibility will favor the NEX-3. HX50V suits travelers wanting wide-to-telephoto coverage in a pocket.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Key requirements: fast continuous shooting, rapid and accurate focus tracking, telephoto reach.

  • NEX-3: 7 fps burst is solid for entry-level but limited AF tracking reduces success with fast-moving subjects. Requires pairing with telephoto E-mount lenses.
  • HX50V: 10 fps capture rate backs up its quick shooting style. 30x zoom (24-720mm equiv) means no need for big, heavy lenses. Optical image stabilization is a big plus here for handheld telephoto. However, image quality at full zoom is compromised by sensor size and diffraction.

For casual sports or wildlife, the HX50V provides a grab-and-go zoom solution. The NEX-3 is better for those who prefer faster lenses and higher image fidelity but at the cost of lens bulk.

Street Photography

Street shooters want low weight, discretion, and low light performance.

  • NEX-3: Rangefinder style is ideal, with subtle shutter sound and tiltable screen for candid angles. APS-C sensor excels in low light.
  • HX50V: Small body and versatile zoom are handy. Built-in GPS can geo-tag shots on the fly.

If subtlety and quality are priorities, NEX-3 is preferred; for all-in-one zoom versatility and mobility, HX50V.

Macro Photography

Macro demands close focusing, high resolution, and precise manual focus.

  • NEX-3: Depends on lens choice. With compatible Sony E-mount macro lenses and tilting screen, it shines.
  • HX50V: Close focus as near as 5 cm at wide angle with built-in lens. Good for spontaneous macro shots but limited if you want extreme detail.

Night and Astrophotography

Low noise at high ISO and long exposures matter.

  • NEX-3: APS-C sensor with native ISO up to 12800 and solid noise control shines here.
  • HX50V: Smaller sensor struggles with noise above ISO 800; limited long exposure features.

Video Capabilities

Video has become a core feature.

  • NEX-3: Lacks 4K; captures 720p HD at 30fps. No mic/headphone ports limit professional video use.
  • HX50V: Offers 1080p Full HD at 60fps and AVCHD format, better video specs for casual videographers but no audio inputs.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither camera offers weather resistance or rugged protections such as dustproofing or shockproofing, typical for budget-level models.

The NEX-3’s magnesium alloy frame offers decent durability, whereas the HX50V’s compact plastic body prioritizes light weight.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Sony NEX-3’s strength is its use of the Sony E mount lenses, with over 120+ lens options spanning primes and zooms for most genres - from fast portrait primes to macro and super telephoto zooms.

The HX50V has a fixed lens - a practical 24-720mm equivalent zoom with F3.5-6.3 aperture. While limited in optical quality and aperture, it’s very versatile for everyday use without carrying extra gear.

Connectivity, Battery Life, and Storage

  • NEX-3: Eye-Fi wireless card support (now somewhat outdated), USB 2.0, HDMI output. Battery life rated at 330 shots.
  • HX50V: Built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, USB 2.0 and HDMI. Superior battery life at 400 shots.

The HX50V’s built-in GPS is a bonus for travel photographers wanting shot location data.

Price and Value Analysis

As of the latest data:

  • Sony NEX-3: Often found secondhand or discounted, with body price close to zero new since discontinued.
  • Sony HX50V: Priced new around $440, reflecting its more recent release and built-in superzoom versatility.

For those on a strict budget prioritizing image quality and creative optics, used NEX-3 plus good lenses may offer better photographic results. HX50V sells convenience and versatility at a modest price.

Summary of Technical Scores and Genre Performance

To visualize the overall performance, here is a comparison of ratings from objective metrics and genre scores compiled from my testing:

Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Use Case / User Type Recommended Camera Why
Beginner Portrait & Landscape Sony NEX-3 Larger sensor, better image quality, lenses
Travel Photographer Sony HX50V Pocketable, versatile zoom, GPS
Wildlife & Sports Casual Sony HX50V Faster burst, telephoto reach, image stabilization
Street Photography Enthusiast Sony NEX-3 Discreet design, tilting screen, manual control
Macro Photographer Sony NEX-3 + macro lens Superior focusing precision, sensor size
Budget-Conscious Image Quality Sony NEX-3 (used) Better sensor and RAW support
Video Casual Shooter Sony HX50V Full HD 60fps, AVCHD recording

Final Thoughts from a Veteran Camera Tester

I have personally tested both cameras in multiple scenarios. The Sony NEX-3 remains a solid introduction to mirrorless photography with APS-C benefits if you can handle the need for extra lenses and a learning curve. The Sony HX50V excels as a grab-and-go compact superzoom, trading sensor size for reach and convenience.

Neither is perfect - NEX-3’s aging AF and video features may frustrate some; HX50V’s small sensor limits image quality and RAW capture. But choosing either depends primarily on your priorities: image quality and creative lens control (NEX-3) vs portability and versatility with zoom (HX50V).

By weighing these practical differences against your personal shooting style and needs, you’ll be far better equipped to buy the best camera for you rather than chasing specs alone.

Short Quick Reference

Sony NEX-3

  • Pros: Large APS-C sensor, interchangeable lenses, RAW format, tilting screen
  • Cons: No built-in viewfinder, limited video, no image stabilization
  • Best for: Enthusiasts focused on image quality and manual photography

Sony HX50V

  • Pros: 30x optical zoom, image stabilization, full HD video @ 60fps, GPS
  • Cons: Small sensor, no RAW, fixed lens
  • Best for: Travelers, casual shooters wanting one-lens convenience

I hope this detailed comparison demystifies these two distinct Sony cameras for you. Should you want personalized advice for your photography goals, feel free to reach out. Happy shooting!

Sony NEX-3 vs Sony HX50V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony NEX-3 and Sony HX50V
 Sony Alpha NEX-3Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
General Information
Manufacturer Sony Sony
Model type Sony Alpha NEX-3 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-06-07 2013-04-24
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Bionz -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.4 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 365.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4592 x 3056 5184 x 2920
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Max boosted ISO - 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Sony E fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5 - 6.3
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 121 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT Xtra Fine LCD XtraFine LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 7.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Advanced Flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 297 gr (0.65 pounds) 272 gr (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") 108 x 64 x 38mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 68 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 830 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 400 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NPFW50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $439