Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350
Portability
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
94 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Sony WX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
- Superseded the Sony WX300
- Refreshed by Sony WX500
Photography Glossary Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Sony TX200V and Sony WX350, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Sony. The image resolution of the TX200V (18MP) and the WX350 (18MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TX200V was released 24 months before the WX350 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony WX350 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the TX200V matches up vs the WX350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony TX200V Gallery & Sony WX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony WX350
| TX200V | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Sony TX200V
| WX350 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Sony TX200V and Sony WX350
| TX200V | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Sony TX200V offers external measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony WX350 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Sony TX200V and Sony WX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TX200V versus the WX350.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TX200V and WX350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The picture below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TX200V and WX350.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged TX200V will be behind in sensor tech.
Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sony TX200V Portrait photography features
Sony WX350 Portrait photography features
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Sony TX200V
Street photography with Sony WX350
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
environment proof
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sony TX200V as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sony TX200V as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
includes focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sony TX200V as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sony TX200V Vlogging highlights
Sony WX350 Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sony TX200V vs Sony WX350 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-30 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | BIONZ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 2s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 129 gr (0.28 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 470 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-BN | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $270 |