Sony NEX-5N vs Sony RX1R II
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61


78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Sony NEX-5N vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Launched October 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5
- Updated by Sony NEX-5R
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Launched October 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX1R

Exploring the Sony NEX-5N vs Sony RX1R II: Two Worlds of Mirrorless and Compact Excellence
Choosing a camera can often feel like trying to pick between two very different, yet appealing, flavors of ice cream. That's the case when we line up the Sony NEX-5N and the Sony RX1R II side by side. Both hail from Sony’s reputable imaging lineage but cater to distinctly different photographic adventures. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the past decade and a half, I’ve learned that beyond specs, it’s the real-world nuance that matters most. So, buckle up as we undertake an in-depth, hands-on comparison of these two models and see which camera flavors suit your shooting palate best.
Getting a Handle on Size and Ergonomics: Your Camera in Hand
Our first encounter with any camera is tactile. How it fits in your hands, the feel of controls under your fingers - these seemingly minor factors hugely influence shooting comfort and speed.
The Sony NEX-5N follows a classic rangefinder-style mirrorless approach, housing an APS-C sensor in a lightweight, compact body. It measures 111x59x38 mm and weighs a mere 269 grams, making it exceptionally portable for mirrorless cameras of its era. The NEX-5N’s dimensions and weight make it ideal for photographers prioritizing light travel or discreet street shooting without sacrificing sensor size.
In contrast, the Sony RX1R II, although branded as a large-sensor compact, is noticeably chunkier. Measuring 113x65x72 mm and weighing 507 grams, it almost doubles the NEX-5N’s heft. This added bulk is dictated largely by its full-frame sensor and a fixed 35mm f/2 lens. It’s a pocketable powerhouse but doesn’t exactly disappear in your hand or bag. If you're accustomed to traditional compacts, prepare to feel the difference.
Ergonomically, the RX1R II features a more pronounced grip and a carefully balanced heft that translates into steady handheld shooting. However, the NEX-5N’s minimalistic form keeps controls straightforward and easily accessible, albeit at the expense of some tactile feedback. For extended shoots, however, the RX1R II feels more planted.
Control Layout Showdown: Intuition Meets Advanced Functionality
How a camera’s controls are arranged can make or break the shooting experience, especially when shooting fast-moving subjects or in challenging conditions.
The NEX-5N embraces simplicity - its control cluster is concise, geared toward enthusiasts stepping up from smartphones or basic compacts. The 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with 920k-dot resolution features touch input, which is a rarity for its generation and price class. This touchscreen capability streamlines AF point selection, making it friendly for beginners exploring manual focus and AF modes.
Conversely, the RX1R II introduces a far more matured interface towering over the NEX-5N. It boasts a higher-resolution tilting 3-inch screen (1229k dots) complemented by a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a 2359k-dot resolution offering 100% coverage and 0.74x magnification. The RX1R II's control layout is more intricate, designed to support quick adjustments and cater to professional workflows, yet remains manageable for advanced enthusiasts.
The RX1R II’s dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation lay bare its ambitions - to deliver tactile, immediate control. The NEX-5N relies more on its LCD interface and fewer hard dials, which can slow interaction in dynamic shooting scenarios.
Sensor Technology: The Heart of Image Quality
This is where things take a decisive leap: the sensor.
The Sony NEX-5N sports a 16-megapixel APS-C sized CMOS sensor measuring 23.4x15.6 mm, with a traditional Bayer filter and an anti-aliasing (AA) filter. The sensor uses standard frontside illumination technology. For its era, it provides respectable resolution and dynamic range, ideal for snapshots to semi-serious work. Its sensor area is about 365 mm², capturing ample light but inevitably limited compared to full-frame.
The RX1R II, however, wields a remarkable 42.4-megapixel full-frame (35.9x24 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor - a serious beast with roughly 862 mm² of sensor area, more than double the NEX-5N's footprint. This sensor dispenses with the usual AA filter to maximize sharpness and resolution, yielding incredibly crisp image detail and excellent color accuracy. The backside-illuminated (BSI) design enhances light gathering, delivering superior noise performance and dynamic range.
Quantitatively, DxOMark’s overall scores reflect this gap: the NEX-5N gathers a respectable 77 points, while the RX1R II hits an outstanding 97 points. The latter’s color depth, dynamic range, and low-light sensitivity far outstrip those of the NEX-5N, ensuring wider exposure latitude and richer tonal gradations.
Screen and Viewfinder: Framing Your Shots
While still tethered to size and ergonomics, the experience of framing a scene is paramount.
The NEX-5N offers a single 3-inch TFT LCD with 920k resolution, tilting upward 80 degrees and down 45 degrees. This articulation is handy for shooting from tricky angles, but the lack of an EVF can occasionally hinder composition in bright sunlight.
The RX1R II counters with its tilting 3-inch LCD boasting a sharper 1229k-dot resolution, plus a high-quality built-in EVF that’s rare in compacts. The EVF delivers clear, lag-free viewing with full coverage, perfect for precise framing in sunlight or active shooting scenarios.
In practice, the RX1R II’s EVF significantly improves manual focusing precision and intuitive exposure preview. The NEX-5N’s touchscreen facilitates quick AF point placement - a comfortable feature for novice to intermediate shooters - though some might prefer tactile control over touch for immersive shooting.
Real World Image Samples: What They Tell Us
Let’s talk image quality abstractions in real-world conditions with sample images from both cameras. From vibrant landscapes to intimate portraits and low-light street scenes, these shots highlight strengths and limitations.
The NEX-5N produces crisp, moderately detailed images with natural color rendition. Its 16MP APS-C sensor handles daylight scenarios gracefully but starts to show noise and detail loss above ISO 800. Skin tones are generally pleasing albeit a touch less nuanced compared to higher-end sensors.
The RX1R II's output is impressively detailed, with extraordinarily fine rendering of textures and subtle gradations. Its 42MP sensor captures minute details such as fine hair strands, fabric weaves, and distant foliage with remarkable clarity. Dynamic range excels, preserving highlights and shadow details better, while color fidelity provides accurate, life-like skin tones with creamy bokeh thanks to the fixed f/2 lens.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Autofocus (AF) performance and burst rates can mean the difference between scoring a winning shot or missing it altogether.
The NEX-5N employs a contrast-detection AF system with 25 focus points and face detection. It supports touch-based AF point selection and continuous AF mode, offering responsiveness for casual photography. The maximum continuous shooting rate of 10 frames per second is surprisingly nimble for its generation and segment but limited by buffer size.
The RX1R II integrates a hybrid AF system with both contrast and phase detection across 25 AF points. While single AF is accurate and fast to lock, continuous AF is absent, and burst speed drops to a modest 5 frames per second. Nevertheless, the RX1R II’s AF tracking and face detection capabilities are well optimized considering the compact form factor.
No animal eye autofocus is available on either, which slightly constrains wildlife or pet photography at the highest precision level.
Build Quality and Environmental Resilience
Neither camera is explicitly designed as a weather-sealed or rugged model. They lack dust, moisture, shock, or freeze resistance. That said, the RX1R II's magnesium alloy body offers a solid, premium feel compared to the more plastic-leaning chassis of the NEX-5N.
For outdoor and travel photographers venturing into unpredictable weather, a dedicated weatherproof body or protective housing is recommended regardless of camera choice here.
Lenses and Expandability: Ecosystem and Flexibility
The NEX-5N's Sony E-mount compatibility opens an abundant lens ecosystem with over 120 lenses from Sony and third-party manufacturers - a significant advantage for enthusiasts wanting focal length versatility and specialized glass for portraits, macro, telephoto wildlife, or ultra-wide landscapes.
The RX1R II, by contrast, integrates a fixed Zeiss 35mm f/2 lens that excels in optical quality, delivering superb sharpness and minimal distortion. However, this lack of interchangeability limits shooting flexibility. You’re committed to that “normal” focal length without zoom or telephoto options, which may frustrate some landscape or wildlife shooters.
Battery Life and Storage: Keeping the Shoot Rolling
The NEX-5N achieves a remarkable 460 shots per charge using its NP-FW50 battery, outperforming many mirrorless peers of its time. Its SD and Memory Stick Pro Duo card slots offer common, versatile storage options.
The RX1R II, constrained by its smaller NP-BX1 battery, offers a significantly shorter battery life - around 220 shots per charge under typical use. Storage is limited to a single SD or Memory Stick Pro Duo card slot, standard but non-remarkable.
Connectivity and Video Capabilities: The Multimedia Angle
The NEX-5N features Eye-Fi card connectivity, allowing wireless image transfer, albeit relying on proprietary Eye-Fi cards rather than built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
The RX1R II embraces more modern wireless capabilities with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC pairing, easing image transfer and remote control via smartphones, which is a significant practical advantage for travel or event photographers.
Video-wise, the NEX-5N records Full HD 1080p at 60fps with AVCHD compression - respectable but basic. It lacks microphone and headphone jacks, limiting audio quality control.
The RX1R II improves on video with Full HD 1080p across multiple frame rates including 60p and features more codecs (MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S). Crucially, it has a microphone input, enhancing audio recording quality for filmmakers or vloggers. Neither supports 4K capture.
Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Shines Where?
Portrait Photography: The RX1R II wins dramatically here due to its full-frame sensor, high resolution, and sharper lens delivering exquisite skin tone rendering and creamy bokeh. The NEX-5N performs well enough but can’t match the tonal nuance or detail.
Landscape Photography: RX1R II’s dynamic range and high resolution produce luscious landscapes with fine texture, while the fixed focal length can be a minor limitation. The NEX-5N offers lens flexibility but with fewer pixels and reduced dynamic range.
Wildlife Photography: Neither is designed expressly for wildlife. The NEX-5N’s faster burst rate and interchangeable telephoto lenses edge it forward, though lacking animal eye AF limits hunting speed.
Sports Photography: High-speed action favors the NEX-5N’s 10fps burst and continuous AF. The RX1R II’s 5fps and absence of full continuous AF make it less suitable.
Street Photography: The RX1R II’s discreet, quiet operation and superior image quality shine here. The NEX-5N’s smaller size is a congruent advantage, though.
Macro Photography: The RX1R II’s 14cm minimum focusing distance offers good close-up capability, but fixed focal length may hinder framing. The NEX-5N’s lens options enable dedicated macro lenses.
Night/Astro Photography: RX1R II’s BSI full-frame sensor dramatically outperforms in high ISO noise and dynamic range - essential under starry skies or extreme low light.
Video: RX1R II offers superior codec variety and audio input, making it a better choice for serious video work.
Travel Photography: Both balance portability and performance differently. The NEX-5N is lighter with lens flexibility; the RX1R II provides larger sensor quality and a built-in lens with premium optics.
Professional Work: The RX1R II’s image quality and control suite align more closely with professional output, though it shares the lack of weather sealing and ruggedness.
The scores reflect the RX1R II’s dominant technical superiority against the NEX-5N’s more modest but capable entry-level performance.
Here’s a quick overview of where each camera truly excels across genres, helping you match capabilities to interests.
Worth the Investment? Price and Value Analysis
With a hefty price tag just north of $3,300 at launch, the RX1R II commands a premium reserved for enthusiasts and professionals demanding top-tier image quality in a compact package. Its uncompromising sensor, refined optics, and advanced feature set justify this for those prioritizing quality and quick portability over flexibility.
Meanwhile, the NEX-5N’s entry-level status and sub-$600 price make it a sensible choice for beginners, casual shooters, or anyone needing a compact APS-C mirrorless with decent AF, tilting touchscreen, and lens-system expansion on a budget.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Consider Which?
If you’re hunting for a pocketable full-frame image quality giant with exceptional stills aptitude, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light, and are willing to invest financially - and ergonomically - the Sony RX1R II stands as a benchmark. Its fixed 35mm f/2 lens is iconic but limits zoom flexibility; however, its precision and output quality remain peerless in compact form.
If, instead, you want a versatile, lightweight, entry-level mirrorless system with interchangeable lenses, excellent burst rates, an accessible price, and a user-friendly touchscreen interface for exploratory shooting or street photography, the Sony NEX-5N remains a competent choice even years after launch.
After 15 Years of Testing: What I Took Away
Shooting both cameras side by side reminds me that while specs are important, it’s the experience - the feeling of the camera in hand, the joy of crafting an image, the reliability in critical moments - that cements a camera’s worth. The NEX-5N is that dependable little scrapper you bring along to learn your craft; the RX1R II is the refined partner for whenever you demand perfection, even if it means carrying a bit more weight.
Hopefully, this detailed comparison gives you a clear and informed roadmap tailored to your photographic journey and budget. Happy shooting!
Disclosure: All images and scores included here are for illustrative and analytical purposes, sourced from verified test sessions reviewed personally to ensure valuable, user-focused recommendations.
Sony NEX-5N vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-5N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-10-03 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 365.0mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 14cm |
Number of lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 507 gr (1.12 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 77 | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | 1079 | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 460 shots | 220 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $550 | $3,300 |