Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS12, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL2 was unveiled 23 months later than the FS12 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PL2 grades vs the FS12 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic FS12
E-PL2 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 23 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-PL2
FS12 | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS12
E-PL2 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 features outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL2 versus the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f7c5/1f7c5367c6491b9bd89664f1a976127d83c9d54c" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and FS12 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/641d6/641d6faa724ef9a0d9bfdd1be8b7df50d0dc7166" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL2 and FS12.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL2 uses the bigger sensor which will make achieving bokeh simpler. The newer E-PL2 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dd35/5dd35161e785f3fe19d02ce81b38ad53e50881bd" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c369/8c369a1bc9c250a6013abff5064cc778bd6f7dbd" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 129 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $228 |