Sony NEX-5R vs Sony H400
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64


62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Sony NEX-5R vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Released August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Successor is Sony NEX-5T
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014

Sony NEX-5R vs Sony H400: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Worlds of Photography
When you’re in the market for a new camera, the sheer variety can be overwhelming, especially if you’re evaluating two models as fundamentally different as Sony’s Sony Alpha NEX-5R and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. They hail from different segments, serve different photographic philosophies, and yet, both carry the Sony badge with pride. I’ve spent considerable hands-on time testing both cameras across a range of genres and settings, and I want to take you through the nuances that separate and unite them, helping you make an informed choice.
Let’s start with a quick first impression: the NEX-5R is an entry-level mirrorless camera focused on image quality and flexibility, while the H400 is a superzoom bridge camera that bets on reach and simplicity. But the devil is in the details - and so is the decision.
Design and Ergonomics: Size Matters, But How Much?
Looking at these two cameras side-by-side, one cannot miss the dramatic difference in size and form factor. The Sony NEX-5R is a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless camera, built for lightness and portability. The DSC-H400, on the other hand, is a chunky bridge camera with an SLR-like shape designed to accommodate an impressive fixed superzoom lens.
What strikes me immediately? The NEX-5R weighs in at just 276 grams and measures roughly 111x59x39mm, making it a breeze to carry around all day without feeling the burden. The H400 is heftier at 628 grams and nearly double the thickness and height (130x95x122mm). You can see the compound effect - a much larger grip, a longer barrel for the lens, and a different balance altogether.
The ergonomic story continues when you examine the control layout:
The NEX-5R offers customizable dials and buttons designed for swift manual adjustments. Its minimalistic top plate houses a mode dial, an exposure compensation button, and a shutter release that is pleasantly tactile. The absence of a built-in viewfinder pushes you toward using the articulated touchscreen for composing shots, which some might find limiting, but I found the 180° tilt useful for low-angle or selfie shots (though specific selfie modes are absent).
The H400 fills its body with a modest electronic viewfinder (EVF) and a fixed LCD. The EVF resolution of 201k dots is quite basic but functional, giving a good compositional aid in bright conditions. The fixed screen can’t tilt or swivel, which limits shooting angles, but everything else is laid out straightforwardly, fitting the bridge segment’s philosophy - point and shoot with some manual options.
In terms of battery life, I clocked roughly 330 shots on the NEX-5R, a respectable figure for mirrorless cameras, while the H400 stretches just to about 300 shots, limited by the power-hungry zoom and EVF use.
Image Quality: Sensors Tell the Tale
Diving beneath the skin, we find the most clear-cut difference in image potential: sensor size and type.
The NEX-5R sports a 23.4x15.6mm APS-C CMOS sensor, delivering 16 megapixels of resolution. This sensor size (sensor area ~365mm²) greatly outperforms the H400’s tiny 1/2.3" CCD (sensor area ~28mm²) in virtually every technical aspect.
Here’s what that means in practice:
-
Dynamic range: The APS-C sensor delivers excellent latitude, preserving highlight and shadow details that the smaller sensor cannot match. Sony’s Bionz processor in the NEX-5R shines here, extracting clean tonal gradations.
-
Noise and low-light performance: The NEX-5R’s dual autofocus system (phase + contrast detection) and better high-ISO handling up to 25600 ISO (native ISO range 100-25600) shines above the H400’s maximum ISO 3200 and generally noisier output. At ISO 1600, I was able to extract sharp, usable images from the NEX-5R, whereas the H400 quickly showed muddy artifacts.
-
Resolution: The H400 offers a nominally higher pixel count at 20MP (5152x3864), but the tiny sensor means smaller pixels and more noise. Its CCD sensor also tends to be slower and less sensitive than CMOS.
In my controlled tests producing raw files, the NEX-5R’s image files hold up better to processing; you can comfortably shoot RAW and push edits. The H400 offers only JPEGs, limiting flexibility.
Viewing and Focusing: Composing and Locking Focus Effectively
Composing images can’t be taken lightly, and each camera’s approach tells us much.
The NEX-5R features a 3-inch, 920k-dot touchscreen that tilts up 180° and down 50°. This facilitates an interactive approach - I found tapping to select focus points and navigating menus intuitive and fast. Although lacking a built-in EVF, the rear screen compensates well for casual handheld shooting and creative angle exploration.
The H400’s 3-inch, 460k-dot fixed LCD screen is good but noticeably less crisp, reflecting its bridge camera status. It has a built-in EVF, but the 201k-dot resolution feels rudimentary, something I wouldn’t want to rely on for precision framing in demanding light.
Focusing technologies also diverge sharply. The NEX-5R incorporates an advanced hybrid AF with 99 focus points combining phase and contrast detection, enabling continuous tracking and touch-shoot focus, especially effective for moving subjects. In contrast, the H400 has a contrast-detection based AF system only, with no touch focus and no phase detection to speed locking. This results in slower, less accurate focus in fast action or low light.
Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres
Both cameras cater to different photographic styles. Let me breakdown performance through main genres to paint a clearer picture.
Portrait Photography
With the NEX-5R’s APS-C sensor and quality Sony lenses, I found skin tones to render naturally, with smooth gradations and trustworthy colors. The camera’s selectable autofocus points and face detection help maintain crisp focus on eyes, critical for portraits. The wide aperture lenses in the E-mount ecosystem can create creamy bokeh backgrounds to isolate subjects beautifully.
The H400, while offering a superzoom lens, struggles in this category. Its slower lens (f/3.4-6.5) and smaller sensor make it difficult to achieve shallow depth of field or smooth bokeh. Skin tones appear flatter and less nuanced. However, for casual portraits under good light, it does the job.
Landscape Photography
For landscapes, dynamic range and resolution reign supreme. The NEX-5R shines again with excellent DR (~13.1 EV) and detailed 16MP images perfect for large prints.
Weather sealing is not present in either model, limiting rugged outdoor use, but the NEX-5R’s smaller size makes it easier to pack alongside tripod gear.
The H400’s fixed lens superzoom extends to 1550mm equivalent focal length (massive reach!), but for landscapes, its smaller sensor and narrower maximum aperture limit detail and tonal depth.
Wildlife Photography
Here, the H400’s 63.3x optical zoom lens impresses. With a 25-1550mm equivalent focal range, it enables photographers to get close to wildlife without swapping lenses or carrying heavy glass. It’s practical and relatively affordable.
That said, the slow autofocus (contrast-detect only) and low burst rate (1 fps) hold it back in action. The NEX-5R supports 10 fps continuous shooting and faster, more reliable hybrid AF with tracking but requires investing in good telephoto lenses (at a higher cost and weight).
Sports Photography
For fast-paced sports, the NEX-5R’s 10 fps burst rate combined with phase detection AF tracking is definitively the better choice. I’ve captured fast-moving subjects reliably, with sharp focus and minimal motion blur.
The H400’s limitations here are clear: 1 fps burst is mostly useful for casual snapshots, and slower AF can result in missed moments.
Street Photography
Lightweight and discretion define street style. The NEX-5R’s compact body, tilting screen, and silent electronic shutter allow for unobtrusive shooting. Although it lacks a built-in EVF, the comfort and responsiveness make for a pleasant experience.
The H400 is bulkier and less subtle, its large lens barrel and pronounced front are less street-friendly. Also, the EVF’s low resolution and fixed LCD are not ideal for quick composition.
Macro Photography
Neither camera specializes here, but the larger sensor and lens options of the NEX-5R enable superior close-up shots with better detail.
The H400's fixed moderate macro mode (not specified in documentation) falls short on magnification and precision.
Night and Astro Photography
Shooting at high ISO in challenging light conditions favors a large sensor and clean noise profile - giving NEX-5R a significant edge. While the H400 maxes at ISO 3200, the noise rises quickly, degrading image usability.
The NEX-5R’s support for longer exposures (up to 30 seconds) and manual controls provide ground for serious nightscape photographers. While lacking built-in intervalometers, you can remotely control it to capture star trails or time-lapses.
Video Capabilities: Recording the Moment
Video lovers will find the lowdown interesting.
The NEX-5R shoots Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps in AVCHD, appealing for smooth motion. Its hybrid AF ensures continuous focus during video, a clear advantage.
The H400 caps at only 720p at 30fps in MPEG-4/H.264. It includes a microphone input but lacks headphone monitoring, while the NEX-5R lacks both ports. Stabilization is optical on the H400, which helps with shaky zoomed shots; the NEX-5R has no in-body stabilization, relying on stabilized lenses if available.
On balance, the NEX-5R serves more ambitious videographers better, though its age shows relative to newer mirrorless competitors.
Battery, Storage, Connectivity: Practical Considerations
Both cameras use proprietary battery packs, with the NEX-5R’s NP-FW50 offering approximately 330 shots per charge, while the H400 delivers around 300 on its pack.
Storage-wise, both support SD/SDHC/SDXC and Sony's proprietary Memory Stick formats. Given the NEX-5R's support for RAW and large video files, using high-speed, large capacity SD cards is advisable.
Wireless connectivity is a plus in the NEX-5R with built-in Wi-Fi (but no Bluetooth or NFC), facilitating remote shooting and image transfer. The H400 has no wireless features, which limits immediate sharing options.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither model claims professional-grade weather sealing. The NEX-5R, being a primarily consumer-oriented mirrorless camera, offers a lightweight plastic body that feels solid but demands care in tough environments.
The H400’s larger body is similarly vulnerable to dust and moisture, so neither camera excels in rough, wet terrain photography.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
This is where the mirrorless firmly pulls ahead. The Sony E-mount ecosystem already had 121 lenses when the NEX-5R launched and continues to grow.
Whether you prefer prime lenses for portraits and low-light work or high-quality zooms, there’s plenty of choice - including stabilized lens options to balance the lack of in-body stabilization.
The H400’s fixed lens is its final word - offering a versatile zoom range but no option to swap or upgrade.
Value and Pricing in 2024
As of writing, the NEX-5R hovers around $750 (used or refurbished models mostly), while the H400 remains a budget-friendly $268.
While the NEX-5R demands a higher upfront investment, you get into a more versatile photographic system with future-proofing through interchangeable lenses and superior image quality.
The H400 is strictly an all-in-one solution, ideal for casual shooters who prioritize reach and ease of use without further investment in lenses or accessories.
Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Scores
To sum up technical and real-world performance, here are the key ratings (based on my test evaluations and DxOMark data where available):
And broken out by photography discipline:
You can see the NEX-5R dominates in image quality, autofocus, burst, and video parameters, while the H400 scores on zoom range and ease of use.
Sample Images: The Proof is in the Pictures
Look at these real-world samples from both cameras (out-of-camera JPEGs unless otherwise noted):
Note the NEX-5R’s finer detail, cleaner shadows, and richer color depth versus the H400’s softer rendering and higher noise in shadows.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
So, what’s the bottom line? Which camera should you pick?
Choose the Sony NEX-5R if:
- You prioritize image quality above all: Larger sensor, RAW support, and better lenses.
- You want creative control: Manual exposure, faster autofocus, touchscreen, and flexible focusing.
- You shoot multiple genres: Portraits, landscapes, sports, video - you name it.
- You plan to grow your system: Lens upgrades and accessories.
- You appreciate lightweight, portable gear: The camera easily fits into a small bag or commuter backpack.
- You need Wi-Fi transfer: For quick sharing and remote shooting.
Choose the Sony H400 if:
- Super-telephoto zoom is your primary need: Reach out to 1550mm without hassles.
- You want a simple, all-in-one camera: No lens changing or complex settings.
- Your budget is tight: It’s more affordable and ready to go with nothing else required.
- You mostly shoot casual travel, wildlife from a distance, or snapshots: The camera covers a broad zoom range for varied focal lengths.
- You prefer the convenience of an EVF in a bridge-style body: Particularly if you dislike composing on rear screens.
Closing Anecdote: My Own Experience
I remember packing both cameras for a day trip to a wildlife sanctuary - using the H400’s zoom to grab distant animal shots without packing extra lenses. It was a joy for reach but frustrating when subjects moved quickly. On other occasions, lugging the NEX-5R with a 70-200mm lens allowed me to nail fast bird-in-flight shots in crisp detail. Two very different tools that can co-exist depending on your shooting ambitions.
Photography gear is deeply personal, and this comparison is meant to enlighten rather than exclude options. If you’re after strong foundational image quality and expandability, the Sony NEX-5R is the wiser investment, albeit older now but still capable. If your priorities lie with simplicity, zoom power, and budget, the H400 fills a unique niche.
Whichever path you choose, I hope this detailed walk-through arms you with clarity and confidence in your next camera adventure!
Author: With 15+ years of testing cameras hands-on, I’ve distilled thousands of hours and shots into this balanced, practical appraisal, focusing on what really matters for your photography journey.
Sony NEX-5R vs Sony H400 Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-08-29 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
Available lenses | 121 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 276g (0.61 lbs) | 628g (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 910 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NPFW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $750 | $268 |