Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Sony NEX-C3 versus Sony TX200V, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Sony. The resolution of the NEX-C3 (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively comparable but the NEX-C3 (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe NEX-C3 was announced 5 months earlier than the TX200V and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the NEX-C3 grades versus the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha NEX-C3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Sony NEX-C3 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Sony TX200V
NEX-C3 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony NEX-C3
TX200V | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony NEX-C3 and Sony TX200V
NEX-C3 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | January 2012 | Same generation | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Sony NEX-C3 enjoys outside dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Sony NEX-C3 versus Sony TX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the NEX-C3 vs the TX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the NEX-C3 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the NEX-C3 and TX200V.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The NEX-C3 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony TX200V will show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony NEX-C3 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-08-22 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 121 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Xtra Fine LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1083 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | 220 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $343 | $500 |