Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL3
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Refreshed by Olympus SH-2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-PL2 was introduced 4 years prior to the SH-1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-PL2 grades versus the SH-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SH-1

 E-PL2 SH-1 
Manually focus Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-PL2

 SH-1 E-PL2 
LaunchedMarch 2014February 2011More recent by 38 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SH-1

 E-PL2 SH-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Display resolution460k460kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 offers exterior measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL2 and the SH-1.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and SH-1 is 85 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and SH-1.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SH-1 will render extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL2
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-1
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
37
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography info
Olympus SH-1 Street photography info
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus by touch
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-1 as a Sports photography camera
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
bad battery (280 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
good battery pack (380 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL2
Travel photography with Olympus SH-1
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
bad battery (280 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
74
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
lighter than others in class (271g)
provides focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SH-1 Landscape photography factors
61
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
bad battery (280 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
49
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging details
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging details
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection autofocus
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
37
rather wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external microphone support
lighter than others in class (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SH-1
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Olympus Stylus SH-1
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Olympus Stylus SH-1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-02-11 2014-03-31
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Truepic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 gr (0.80 lb) 271 gr (0.60 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photographs 380 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Price at release $0 $349